Toward a Dynamical Interpretation of Hierarchical Linguistic Structure

UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report (2009) Toward a dynamical interpretation of hierarchical linguistic structure Sam Tilsen 1. Introduction Hierarchy is one of the most important concepts in the scientific understanding of language. From early structuralist approaches of the mid-1800s, through the paradigm shift to generative grammar in the mid-1900s, and onward to the present, connected-object (“branching”) schemas have been used to represent hierarchical constituency relations between linguistic units. Syntactic trees are the most prominent instantiation of such schemas, but similar arboreal schemas have been applied extensively in nearly all domains of linguistic theory. Recently, an alternative conception of hierarchical structure has arisen, which is based upon interactions between waves, or coupled oscillatory systems. This paper presents a synthesis and extension of such approaches, with the aim of advancing a general wave theory of linguistic structure. This wave theory provides a coherent conceptualization of diverse linguistic phenomena, is cognitively plausible, and is a parsimonious theory. Many syntactic and phonological patterns in language can be understood to arise from general principles of wave interaction. Section 1.1 will consider how hierarchy has traditionally been conceptualized and represented in linguistics, and section 1.2 will describe some previous research which leads the way to a wave-based, dynamical systems perspective on linguistic structure. Section 2 will introduce some general principles regarding how hierarchical structure can be conceptualized with dynamical systems, beginning with systems of two waves, then treating systems of three waves, which can be generalized to more complex systems. This is followed in section 3 by several applications of the theory to phonological and syntactic patterns. These include an examination of how segments interact with syllables and how stress interacts with words, as well as a proposal for dynamical modeling of recursive syntactic patterns and syntactic dislocation phenomena. Section 4 concludes with a discussion of the cognitive plausibility of this approach, and delineates some issues to guide further development of the theory. 1.1 Hierarchical Structure In this paper we are interested in a structural notion of hierarchy, in which concepts of ranking, relation, and containment play important roles. In order to organize our

[1]  J. Kelso,et al.  Skilled actions: a task-dynamic approach. , 1987, Psychological review.

[2]  W. McD. Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie , 1902, Nature.

[3]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Dynamics of 1:2 Coordination: Sources of Symmetry Breaking. , 1999, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  H. Haken,et al.  A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[5]  Michael Gasser,et al.  A Dynamic Approach to Rhythm in Language: Toward a Temporal Phonology , 1995, ArXiv.

[6]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Task-dynamics of gestural timing: Phase windows and multifrequency rhythms , 2000 .

[7]  A. Winfree The geometry of biological time , 1991 .

[8]  Robert F. Port,et al.  Meter and speech , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[9]  John Kingston,et al.  Between the grammar and physics of speech , 1994 .

[10]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Action to Language via the Mirror Neuron System: The role of vocal tract gestural action units in understanding the evolution of phonology , 2006 .

[11]  Ronaldo de Oliveira Batista Western Linguistics: an historical introduction , 2003 .

[12]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  A task-dynamic toolkit for modeling the effects of prosodic structure on articulation , 2008, Speech Prosody 2008.

[13]  Nick Chater,et al.  Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  C. Browman,et al.  Some Notes on Syllable Structure in Articulatory Phonology , 1988, Phonetica.

[15]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks , 2004, Science.

[16]  L Saltzman Elliot,et al.  A Dynamical Approach to Gestural Patterning in Speech Production , 1989 .

[17]  G. Edelman Group selection and phasic reentrant signaling a theory of higher brain function , 1982 .

[18]  C. Browman,et al.  Competing constraints on intergestural coordination and self-organization of phonological structures , 2000 .

[19]  Gavan Lintern,et al.  Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior , 1997, Complex.

[20]  H. Haken Advanced Synergetics: Instability Hierarchies of Self-Organizing Systems and Devices , 1983 .

[21]  G. Edelman,et al.  Spike-timing dynamics of neuronal groups. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  A model for phase transitions in human hand movements during multifrequency tapping , 1996 .

[23]  Dani Byrd,et al.  DYNAMICAL SIMULATIONS OF A PHASE WINDOW MODEL OF RELATIVE TIMING , 2001 .

[24]  W. Klimesch EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis , 1999, Brain Research Reviews.

[25]  Richard H. Rand,et al.  1∶1 and 2∶1 phase entrainment in a system of two coupled limit cycle oscillators , 1984 .

[26]  A. Opstal Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior , 1995 .

[27]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Dynamic action units slip in speech production errors , 2007, Cognition.

[28]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and syntax , 1984 .

[29]  Robert F. Port,et al.  Rhythmic constraints on stress timing in English , 1998 .

[30]  A. Pérez-Villalba Rhythms of the Brain, G. Buzsáki. Oxford University Press, Madison Avenue, New York (2006), Price: GB £42.00, p. 448, ISBN: 0-19-530106-4 , 2008 .

[31]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization - A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences , 2001, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series.

[32]  Wilbert Heeringa,et al.  UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report 2005 , 2006 .

[33]  H. Haken Synergetics: an Introduction, Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions and Self-organization in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology , 1977 .

[34]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Simple model of spiking neurons , 2003, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[35]  Plínio Almeida Barbosa,et al.  Explaining Cross-Linguistic Rhythmic Variability via a Coupled-Oscillator Model of Rhythm Production , 2002 .

[36]  Tommi Nieminen,et al.  COUPLED OSCILLATOR MODEL OF SPEECH RHYTHM , 1999 .

[37]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Polychronization: Computation with Spikes , 2006, Neural Computation.

[38]  Elliot Saltzman,et al.  Task Dynamic Coordination of the Speech Articulators: A Preliminary Model , 1986 .