Neutralizing substitutes for leadership theory: leadership effects and common-source bias.

The purpose of this research was to examine alternative models of substitutes for leadership theory given the general lack of empirical support for the moderating effects postulated by the theory. On this basis, the research posited that the effects of substitutes also could be conceptualized as mediated relations. The research examined moderated and mediated relations for several sets of leader behaviors and substitutes that have been examined in the literature. The research design sampled 49 organizations, with 940 subordinates rating 156 leaders. Results, although generally not supportive of the moderator or mediator hypotheses, essentially demonstrated that leadership matters. The findings also suggest that prior significant effects in substitutes literature may be merely a statistical artifact, resulting from common-source bias.

[1]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Do Substitutes for Leadership Really Substitute for Leadership? An Empirical Examination of Kerr and Jermier's Situational Leadership Model , 1993 .

[2]  F. Yammarino,et al.  Leadership: The multiple-level approaches: Contemporary and alternative. , 1998 .

[3]  C. Schriesheim,et al.  Leader–member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. , 1999 .

[4]  Thomas J. Naughton,et al.  Individualized leadership: A new multiple-level approach , 1995 .

[5]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Substitutes for leadership and the management of professionals , 1993 .

[6]  Norman M. Abrahams,et al.  Pratfalls in moderator research. , 1972 .

[7]  L. James,et al.  Mediators, Moderators, and Tests for Mediation. , 1984 .

[8]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Leadership: The multiple-level approaches: Classical and new wave. , 1998 .

[9]  P. Dorfman,et al.  Leadership and Substitutes for Leadership Among Professional and Nonprofessional Workers , 1986, The Journal of applied behavioral science.

[10]  P. Dorfman,et al.  Substitutes for Leadership: Test of a Construct , 1981 .

[11]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1975 .

[12]  G. Graen,et al.  Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective , 1995 .

[13]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[14]  William H. Bommer,et al.  Meta-analysis of the relationships between Kerr and Jermier's substitutes for leadership and employee job attitudes, role perceptions, and performance. , 1996, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  An examination of substitutes for leadership within a levels-of-analysis framework , 1995 .

[16]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Effects of leader contingent and noncontingent reward and punishment behaviors on subordinate performance and satisfaction. , 1982, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[17]  Vandra L. Huber,et al.  Situational moderators of leader reward and punishment behaviors: fact or fiction? , 1984, Organizational behavior and human performance.

[18]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Measuring And Assessing Organizations , 1980 .

[19]  John M. Jermier,et al.  ''Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement'' - Contextual recollections and current observations , 1997 .

[20]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Kerr and Jermier's substitutes for leadership model: Background, empirical assessment, and suggestions for future research , 1997 .

[21]  William H. Bommer,et al.  Searching for a Needle in a Haystack: Trying to Identify the Illusive Moderators of Leadership Behaviors , 1995 .

[22]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement , 1978 .

[23]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Leadership: The multiple-level approaches , 1995 .

[24]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[25]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  F. Dansereau.  A dyadic approach to leadership: Creating and nurturing this approach under fire , 1995 .