A study was conducted in western North Carolina, along the southeastern extent of the U.S. trout populations, to examine the effect of bioretention areas on runoff temperature. Four bioretention areas were monitored during the summers of 2006 and 2007. It was found that smaller bioretention areas, with respect to the size of their contributing watershed, were able to significantly reduce both maximum and median water temperatures between the inlet and outlet. The proportionately larger bioretention areas were only able to significantly reduce maximum water temperatures between the inlet and outlet; however, these systems showed evidence of substantial reductions in outflow quantity, effectively reducing the thermal impact. Despite temperature reductions, effluent temperatures still posed a potential threat to coldwater streams during the peak summer months. During the summer months, effluent temperatures were generally coolest at the greatest soil depths, supporting evidence of an optimum drain depth between 90 and 120 cm. The ability of bioretention areas to reduce storm-water temperature and flows supports their application to reduce the thermal impacts of urban storm-water runoff.
[1]
F. Wilcoxon.
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
,
1945
.
[2]
D. R. Nielsen,et al.
Soil temperature profiles during infiltration and redistribution of cool and warm irrigation water
,
1970
.
[3]
C. Coutant.
Compilation of Temperature Preference Data
,
1977
.
[4]
C. Hocutt.
Power plants : effects on fish and shellfish behavior
,
1980
.
[5]
Takashi Asaeda,et al.
Heat storage of pavement and its effect on the lower atmosphere
,
1996
.
[6]
Michael E. Dietz,et al.
A Field Evaluation of Rain Garden Flow and Pollutant Treatment
,
2005
.
[7]
A. R. Jarrett,et al.
Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina
,
2006
.
[8]
H. Stefan,et al.
Upper Bounds for Stream Temperatures in the Contiguous United States
,
2002
.