Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing: Some Practical Reminders

The authors review issues related to the application of structural equation modeling (SEM) in marketing. The discussion begins by considering issues related to the process of applying SEM in empirical research, including model specification, identification, estimation, evaluation, and respecification, and reporting of results. In addition to these process issues, a number of other issues, such as formulation of multiple theoretical models, model error versus sampling error, and relating study objectives to the capabilities of SEM, are considered, and suggestions offered regarding ways that SEM applications might be improved.

[1]  N Cliff,et al.  Some Cautions Concerning The Application Of Causal Modeling Methods. , 1983, Multivariate behavioral research.

[2]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  Robert A. Peterson,et al.  Response construction in consumer behavior research , 2005 .

[4]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  G. Hancock,et al.  Evaluating Small Sample Approaches for Model Test Statistics in Structural Equation Modeling , 2004 .

[6]  William R. Darden,et al.  Causal Models in Marketing , 1980 .

[7]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[8]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  B. Muthén,et al.  A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non‐normal Likert variables: A note on the size of the model , 1992 .

[10]  Xin-Yuan Song,et al.  Evaluation of the Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood Approaches in Analyzing Structural Equation Models with Small Sample Sizes , 2004, Multivariate behavioral research.

[11]  S J Henly,et al.  Model selection in covariance structures analysis and the "problem" of sample size: a clarification. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  W. Rozeboom,et al.  Meehl on metatheory. , 2005, Journal of clinical psychology.

[13]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory: , 1982 .

[14]  R. Hauser Disaggregating a social-psychological model of educational attainment , 1972 .

[15]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[16]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[17]  H. Blalock The Presidential Address: Measurement and Conceptualization Problems: The Major Obstacle to Integrating Theory and Research , 1979 .

[18]  H. Schneeweiß Models with latent variables: LISREL versus PLS , 1991 .

[19]  Willem E. Saris,et al.  The Detection and Correction of Specification Errors in Structural Equation Models , 1987 .

[20]  A. Goldberger,et al.  Estimation of a Model with Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes of a Single Latent Variable , 1975 .

[21]  P. Meehl Appraising and Amending Theories: The Strategy of Lakatosian Defense and Two Principles that Warrant It , 1990 .

[22]  T. C. Chamberlin The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses , 1931, The Journal of Geology.

[23]  S. Maxwell,et al.  Implications of Recent Developments in Structural Equation Modeling for Counseling Psychology , 1999 .

[24]  A. Boomsma,et al.  Robustness Studies in Covariance Structure Modeling , 1998 .

[25]  T. C. Chamberlin The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses: With this method the dangers of parental affection for a favorite theory can be circumvented. , 1965, Science.

[26]  Daniel J. Bauer Estimating Multilevel Linear Models as Structural Equation Models , 2003 .

[27]  David W. Gerbing,et al.  An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment , 1988 .

[28]  A. Boomsma Reporting Analyses of Covariance Structures , 2000 .

[29]  Elazar J. Pedhazur,et al.  Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach , 1994 .

[30]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. , 2000, Psychological methods.

[31]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[32]  James H. Steiger,et al.  Driving Fast In Reverse The Relationship Between Software Development, Theory, and Education in Structural Equation Modeling , 2001 .

[33]  J. Platt Strong Inference , 2007 .

[34]  Mike W-L Cheung,et al.  Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: a two-stage approach. , 2005, Psychological methods.

[35]  G. Hancock,et al.  Performance of Bootstrapping Approaches to Model Test Statistics and Parameter Standard Error Estimation in Structural Equation Modeling , 2001 .

[36]  R. MacCallum,et al.  The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: some practical issues. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  Patrick J Curran,et al.  Have Multilevel Models Been Structural Equation Models All Along? , 2003, Multivariate behavioral research.

[38]  David Kaplan,et al.  On the modification and predictive validity of covariance structure models , 1991 .

[39]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[40]  H. Marsh,et al.  Structural equation models of latent interactions: evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. , 2004, Psychological methods.

[41]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Hypotheses in Marketing Science: Literature Review and Publication Audit , 2005 .

[42]  A. Shapiro,et al.  On the multivariate asymptotic distribution of sequential Chi-square statistics , 1985 .

[43]  Jonathan E. Butner,et al.  Multilevel modeling of two cyclical processes: extending differential structural equation modeling to nonlinear coupled systems. , 2005, Psychological methods.

[44]  D. Wegener,et al.  The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  "Issues in the application of covariance structure analysis": A further comment. , 1983 .

[46]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares , 1999 .

[47]  Michael C Neale,et al.  People are variables too: multilevel structural equations modeling. , 2005, Psychological methods.

[48]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[49]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[50]  J. H. Steiger Aspects of Person-Machine Communication in Structural Modeling of Correlations and Covariances. , 1988, Multivariate behavioral research.

[51]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[52]  James H. Steiger,et al.  Driving Fast in Reverse , 2001 .

[53]  Robert C. MacCallum,et al.  Representing sources of error in the common-factor model: Implications for theory and practice. , 1991 .

[54]  Xin-Yuan Song,et al.  Bayesian model comparison of nonlinear structural equation models with missing continuous and ordinal categorical data. , 2004, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[55]  H. Marsh,et al.  In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) Findings , 2004 .

[56]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: the problem of capitalization on chance. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[57]  M. Browne,et al.  Automated Fitting of Nonstandard Models. , 1992, Multivariate behavioral research.

[58]  S. West,et al.  The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. , 1996 .

[59]  Robert C MacCallum,et al.  2001 Presidential Address: Working with Imperfect Models , 2003, Multivariate behavioral research.

[60]  Claes Fornell,et al.  Issues in the Application of Covariance Structure Analysis: A Comment , 1983 .

[61]  S Natasha Beretvas,et al.  Meta-analytic methods of pooling correlation matrices for structural equation modeling under different patterns of missing data. , 2005, Psychological methods.

[62]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[63]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Multiple-group structural modelling with non-normal continuous variables. , 1989 .

[64]  K. Bollen,et al.  A tetrad test for causal indicators. , 2000, Psychological methods.

[65]  Robert C. MacCallum,et al.  SPECIFICATION SEARCHES IN COVARIANCE STRUCTURE MODELING , 1986 .

[66]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[67]  Rachna Shah,et al.  Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward ☆ , 2006 .

[68]  A. Satorra,et al.  Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. , 1994 .

[69]  Y Kano,et al.  Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted? , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[70]  Robert Cudeck,et al.  Analysis of correlation matrices using covariance structure models. , 1989 .

[71]  Tom Wansbeek,et al.  Identification, Equivalent Models, and Computer Algebra , 1994 .

[72]  D. Kaplan Evaluating and Modifying Covariance Structure Models: A Review and Recommendation. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[73]  A. Panter,et al.  Writing about structural equation models. , 1995 .

[74]  Stephen G. West,et al.  Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies , 1995 .

[75]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[76]  Shaun McQuitty,et al.  Statistical power and structural equation models in business research , 2004 .

[77]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[78]  P. Allison Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. , 2003, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[79]  R. Cudeck,et al.  Model selection in covariance structures analysis and the "problem" of sample size: a clarification. , 1991 .

[80]  Knowlton W. Johnson Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: Testing a Theory for Research Use , 1998 .

[81]  Hubert M. Blalock,et al.  Multiple causation, indirect measurement and generalizability in the social sciences , 1986, Synthese.

[82]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[83]  Herman Wold,et al.  Soft modelling: The Basic Design and Some Extensions , 1982 .

[84]  A. Tomarken,et al.  Structural equation modeling: strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. , 2005, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[85]  Ulf Böckenholt,et al.  Structural equation modeling of paired-comparison and ranking data. , 2005, Psychological methods.