BACKGROUND
Selective fusion of double curves in patients with scoliosis is considered to spare fusion levels. In 2011, we studied the lumbosacral takeoff angle, defined as the angle between the center-sacral vertical line and a line through the centra of S1, L5, and L4. The lumbosacral takeoff angle was shown to moderately correlate with the lumbar Cobb angle, and a predictive equation was developed to predict the lumbar Cobb angle after selective fusions. The purposes of the present study were to validate that equation in a separate cohort and to assess differences in outcomes following selective and nonselective fusion.
METHODS
Patients with Lenke 1B, 1C, 3B, or 3C curve patterns undergoing fusion (both selective and nonselective) with pedicle screw constructs and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were included. Selective fusion was defined as a lowest level of fixation cephalad to or at the apex of the lumbar curve. To validate the previously derived equation, we used this data set and analysis of variance to check for differences between the actual and calculated postoperative lumbar Cobb angles. Pearson correlation, multiple linear regression, and t tests were used to explore relationships and differences between the selective and nonselective fusion groups.
RESULTS
The mean calculated postoperative lumbar Cobb angle (and standard deviation) (22.35° ± 3.82°) was not significantly different from the actual postoperative lumbar Cobb angle (21.08° ± 7.75°), with an average model error of -1.268° (95% confidence interval, -2.649° to 0.112°). The preoperative lumbar Cobb angle was larger in patients with deformities that were chosen for nonselective fusion (50.2° versus 38.9°; p < 0.001). Performing selective fusion resulted in a 3.5° correction of the lumbosacral takeoff angle (p < 0.001), whereas nonselective fusion resulted in a 9.3° correction (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The lumbosacral takeoff angle can be used to predict the residual lumbar Cobb angle and may be used by surgeons to aid in the decision between selective and nonselective fusion. The change in the lumbosacral takeoff angle following selective fusion is small. Improvement in the lumbosacral takeoff angle and coronal balance is greater in association with nonselective fusion.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
[1]
P. Newton,et al.
Defining the "Three-Dimensional Sagittal Plane" in Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
,
2015,
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[2]
R. Betz,et al.
Did the Lenke Classification Change Scoliosis Treatment?
,
2011,
Spine.
[3]
M. Abel,et al.
Selective Versus Nonselective Fusion for Idiopathic Scoliosis: Does Lumbosacral Takeoff Angle Change?
,
2011,
Spine.
[4]
B. S. Richards,et al.
Assessment of Trunk Balance in Thoracic Scoliosis
,
2005,
Spine.
[5]
L. Lenke,et al.
Selective Thoracic Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with C Modifier Lumbar Curves: 2- to 16-Year Radiographic and Clinical Results
,
2004,
Spine.
[6]
R. Betz,et al.
Factors Involved in the Decision to Perform a Selective Versus Nonselective Fusion of Lenke 1B and 1C (King-Moe II) Curves in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
,
2003,
Spine.
[7]
R. Betz,et al.
Spontaneous lumbar curve coronal correction after selective anterior or posterior thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
,
1999,
Spine.
[8]
L. Lenke,et al.
Preventing Decompensation in King Type II Curves Treated With Cotrel‐Dubousset Instrumentation. Strict Guidelines for Selective Thoracic Fusion
,
1992,
Spine.
[9]
D. Mason,et al.
Spinal Decompensation in Cotrel‐Dubousset Instrumentation
,
1991,
Spine.
[10]
R. Winter,et al.
The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.
,
1983,
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.