Controlled loading of cryoprotectants (CPAs) to oocyte with linear and complex CPA profiles on a microfluidic platform.

Oocyte cryopreservation has become an essential tool in the treatment of infertility by preserving oocytes for women undergoing chemotherapy. However, despite recent advances, pregnancy rates from all cryopreserved oocytes remain low. The inevitable use of the cryoprotectants (CPAs) during preservation affects the viability of the preserved oocytes and pregnancy rates either through CPA toxicity or osmotic injury. Current protocols attempt to reduce CPA toxicity by minimizing CPA concentrations, or by minimizing the volume changes via the step-wise addition of CPAs to the cells. Although the step-wise addition decreases osmotic shock to oocytes, it unfortunately increases toxic injuries due to the long exposure times to CPAs. To address limitations of current protocols and to rationally design protocols that minimize the exposure to CPAs, we developed a microfluidic device for the quantitative measurements of oocyte volume during various CPA loading protocols. We spatially secured a single oocyte on the microfluidic device, created precisely controlled continuous CPA profiles (step-wise, linear and complex) for the addition of CPAs to the oocyte and measured the oocyte volumetric response to each profile. With both linear and complex profiles, we were able to load 1.5 M propanediol to oocytes in less than 15 min and with a volumetric change of less than 10%. Thus, we believe this single oocyte analysis technology will eventually help future advances in assisted reproductive technologies and fertility preservation.

[1]  E. Longmire,et al.  Cell motion and recovery in a two-stream microfluidic device , 2010, Microfluidics and nanofluidics.

[2]  G D Smith,et al.  Dynamic microfunnel culture enhances mouse embryo development and pregnancy rates. , 2010, Human reproduction.

[3]  T. Toth,et al.  Fertilization and development of mouse oocytes cryopreserved using a theoretically optimized protocol. , 1996, Human reproduction.

[4]  P. Mazur,et al.  Osmotic responses of preimplantation mouse and bovine embryos and their cryobiological implications , 1986, Cell Biophysics.

[5]  A. V. Van Steirteghem,et al.  Osmotic responses and tolerance limits to changes in external osmolalities, and oolemma permeability characteristics, of human in vitro matured MII oocytes. , 2007, Human reproduction.

[6]  P. Mazur,et al.  Glycerol permeabilities of fertilized and infertilized mouse ova. , 1980, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[7]  Mehmet Toner,et al.  Cell handling using microstructured membranes. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[8]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  Micro- and nanotechnologies for studying cellular function. , 2003, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[9]  J. Mcgrath,et al.  Plasma membrane water permeabilities of human oocytes: The temperature dependence of water movement in individual cells , 1992, Journal of cellular physiology.

[10]  J. Critser,et al.  The effect of osmotic stress on the metaphase II spindle of human oocytes, and the relevance to cryopreservation. , 2004, Human reproduction.

[11]  Christopher Chen PREGNANCY AFTER HUMAN OOCYTE CRYOPRESERVATION , 1986, The Lancet.

[12]  J. Karlsson,et al.  Permeability of the rhesus monkey oocyte membrane to water and common cryoprotectants , 2009, Molecular reproduction and development.

[13]  T. Wilson,et al.  Osmotic volume changes induced by a permeable solute. , 1967, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  Jonathan W. Song,et al.  Characterization and resolution of evaporation-mediated osmolality shifts that constrain microfluidic cell culture in poly(dimethylsiloxane) devices. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[15]  David J Beebe,et al.  Comparison of static and dynamic medium environments for culturing of pre-implantation mouse embryos. , 2002, Comparative medicine.

[16]  B. Fuller,et al.  Membrane permeability of human oocytes in the presence of the cryoprotectant propane-1,2-diol. , 2001, Fertility and sterility.

[17]  G M Fahy,et al.  Vitrification as an approach to cryopreservation. , 1984, Cryobiology.

[18]  D. Beebe,et al.  Physics and applications of microfluidics in biology. , 2002, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[19]  J. van Blerkom,et al.  Cytogenetic, cellular, and developmental consequences of cryopreservation of immature and mature mouse and human oocytes , 1994, Microscopy research and technique.

[20]  J. Mcgrath,et al.  Measurements of the membrane water permeability (Lp) and its temperature dependence (activation energy) in human fresh and failed-to-fertilize oocytes and mouse oocyte. , 1992, Cryobiology.

[21]  D. Gook,et al.  Human oocyte cryopreservation. , 2007, Human reproduction update.

[22]  S. Leibo Water permeability and its activation energy of fertilized and unfertilized mouse ova , 2005, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[23]  J. Mcgrath A microscope diffusion chamber for the determination of the equilibrium and non‐equilibrium osmotic response of individual cells , 1985, Journal of microscopy.

[24]  R. Williams,et al.  The relationship between cell injury and osmotic volume reduction: II. Red cell lysis correlates with cell volume rather than intracellular salt concentration. , 1980, Cryobiology.

[25]  Dino Di Carlo,et al.  Dynamic single-cell analysis for quantitative biology. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[26]  Temperature dependence of mature mouse oocyte membrane permeabilities in the presence of cryoprotectant. , 1997, Cryobiology.

[27]  J. Mcgrath,et al.  Osmotic response of oocytes using a microscope diffusion chamber: a preliminary study comparing murine and human ova. , 1988, Cryobiology.

[28]  S. Heimfeld,et al.  Development of a microfluidic device for determination of cell osmotic behavior and membrane transport properties. , 2006, Cryobiology.

[29]  R. Gosden,et al.  Osmotically inactive volume, hydraulic conductivity, and permeability to dimethyl sulphoxide of human mature oocytes. , 1999, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[30]  Utkan Demirci,et al.  Microfluidics for cryopreservation. , 2009, Lab on a chip.