N1pc reversal following repeated eccentric visual stimulation.

Early event-related potential (ERP) hemispheric asymmetries recorded at occipitoparietal sites are usually observed following the sudden onset of a lateral peripheral stimulus. This is usually reflected in an onset-locked larger N1 over the posterior contralateral hemisphere relative to the ipsilateral hemisphere, an early ERP asymmetry labeled N1pc. When the peripheral sudden onset is followed by a central stimulus, or by a bilaterally balanced visual array of stimuli, these events evoke a reversed N1pc, that is, a larger N1 over the hemisphere ipsilateral to the peripheral sudden onset. This N1pc reversal has been taken as evidence for a remapping of the visual space from an absolute, retinally based frame of reference to a relative, attentionally based frame of reference that codes the spatial positions of objects relative to the peripheral sudden onset, rather than relative to the fovea. Here, we pit the reference frame-remapping account against an alternative account based on reduced neural reactivity following the peripheral sudden onset. In three experiments, we varied the spatial location of an object relative to a preceding sudden onset, and tested the opposite predictions generated by the frame-remapping and the reduced neural reactivity accounts. Taken together, the results from the present experiments were consistent with the reduced neural reactivity account and inconsistent with the frame-remapping account.

[1]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Top-down Enhancement and Suppression of the Magnitude and Speed of Neural Activity , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Tracking the Location of Visuospatial Attention in a Contingent Capture Paradigm , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  View‐invariant object recognition ability develops after discrimination, not mere exposure, at several viewing angles , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[4]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[6]  Y. Rossetti,et al.  Dissociation between intentional and automatic remapping: Different levels of inter-hemispheric transfer , 2011, Vision Research.

[7]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses , 1994 .

[8]  E. Wascher,et al.  Tuning perceptual competition. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  M. Posner Chronometric explorations of mind , 1978 .

[10]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Attentional capture by visual singletons is mediated by top-down task set: new evidence from the N2pc component. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[11]  I. THE ATTENTION SYSTEM OF THE HUMAN BRAIN , 2002 .

[12]  E. Vogel,et al.  The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[13]  Roy Luria,et al.  Orienting attention to objects in visual short-term memory , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  M. Corballis,et al.  Mental rotation under head tilt: Factors influencing the location of the subjective reference frame , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Nicolas Robitaille,et al.  Effect of cue–target interval on the N2pc , 2006, Neuroreport.

[16]  Xiaolin Zhou,et al.  Temporary inhibitory tagging at previously attended locations: evidence from event-related potentials. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[17]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Temporal Brain Dynamics of Multiple Object Processing: The Flexibility of Individuation , 2011, PloS one.

[18]  Refractor Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[19]  Steven J Luck,et al.  Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Arne Ohlendorf,et al.  Contrast adaptation induced by defocus – A possible error signal for emmetropization? , 2009, Vision Research.

[21]  J. Lupiáñez,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Modulation of Spatial Stroop by Object-based Attention but Not by Space- Based Attention , 2022 .

[22]  Pierre Jolicœur,et al.  The N2pc component and stimulus duration , 2007, Neuroreport.

[23]  E. Wascher,et al.  Spatial Representations as an Emergent Feature of Perceptual Processing , 2010 .

[24]  Vincent Di Lollo,et al.  Electrophysiological Indices of Target and Distractor Processing in Visual Search , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  John McDonald,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of multitasking impairment of attentional deployment reflects target-specific processing, not distractor inhibition. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[26]  Jessica Sänger,et al.  Visuo-spatial processing and the N1 component of the ERP. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[27]  G. Mangun Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[28]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Involuntary Attentional Capture is Determined by Task Set: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  Nicolas Robitaille,et al.  Attentional control and capture in the attentional blink paradigm: Evidence from human electrophysiology , 2006 .

[30]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  A psychological refractory period in access to visual short-term memory and the deployment of visual-spatial attention: multitasking processing deficits revealed by event-related potentials. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[31]  S. Zeki A vision of the brain , 1993 .

[32]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Clayton Hickey,et al.  Inhibition of Return in the Covert Deployment of Attention: Evidence from Human Electrophysiology , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  Nicolas Robitaille,et al.  On the control of visual spatial attention: evidence from human electrophysiology , 2006, Psychological research.

[35]  Jeffrey R W Mounts,et al.  Competitive interaction degrades target selection: an ERP study. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[36]  S J Luck,et al.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Space and attention in parietal cortex. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[38]  Michael W. Spratling A single functional model accounts for the distinct properties of suppression in cortical area V1 , 2011, Vision Research.

[39]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  The spatial frame of reference in object naming and discrimination of left-right reflections , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[40]  R. Knight Distributed Cortical Network for Visual Attention , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Chun,et al.  Organization of visual short-term memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  Pierre Jolicœur,et al.  The "red-alert" effect in visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[43]  C. Constantinidis,et al.  Early involvement of prefrontal cortex in visual bottom up attention , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  Julie D. Golomb,et al.  The Native Coordinate System of Spatial Attention Is Retinotopic , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Environmentally defined frames of reference: their time course and sensitivity to spatial cues and attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  J. Jonides,et al.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[47]  M. Bar A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  Michael Bach,et al.  Paired-pulse behavior of visually evoked potentials recorded in human visual cortex using patterned paired-pulse stimulation , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[49]  Clayton Hickey,et al.  Target resolution in visual search involves the direct suppression of distractors: evidence from electrophysiology. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[50]  D. Levine,et al.  Left visual spatial neglect is both environment‐centered and body‐centered , 1987, Neurology.

[51]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Changing Human Visual Field Organization from Early Visual to Extra-Occipital Cortex , 2007, PloS one.

[52]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Electrophysiology of Visual Attention , 2008 .

[53]  S. Luck,et al.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[54]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[55]  A. Kohn Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[56]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  An Area within Human Ventral Cortex Sensitive to “Building” Stimuli Evidence and Implications , 1998, Neuron.

[57]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Ocular artifacts in recording EEGs and event-related potentials II: Source dipoles and source components , 2005, Brain Topography.

[58]  D. Melcher Selective attention and the active remapping of object features in trans-saccadic perception , 2009, Vision Research.

[59]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Cerebral Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr357 Higher Level Visual Cortex Represents Retinotopic, Not Spatiotopic, Object Location , 2011 .

[60]  G. Woodman,et al.  Dissociations Among Attention, Perception, and Awareness During Object-Substitution Masking , 2003, Psychological science.

[61]  R Dell'Acqua,et al.  Spatial attention freezes during the attention blink. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[62]  S Makeig,et al.  Functionally independent components of early event-related potentials in a visual spatial attention task. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[63]  Carl R Olson,et al.  Brain representation of object-centered space in monkeys and humans. , 2003, Annual review of neuroscience.

[64]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Symbolic distance affects two processing loci in the number comparison task , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[65]  David J. Prime,et al.  On the relationship between occipital cortex activity and inhibition of return. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[66]  Nick F. Ramsey,et al.  Interactions between ego- and allocentric neuronal representations of space , 2006, NeuroImage.

[67]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Parietal Lobe Lesions Disrupt Saccadic Remapping of Inhibitory Location Tagging , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[68]  C. Michaels,et al.  Stimulus-Response Compatibility for Absolute and Relative Spatial Correspondence in Reaching and in Button Pressing , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[69]  Alain Berthoz,et al.  Multiple reference frames used by the human brain for spatial perception and memory , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[70]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Coordinate systems in the long-term memory representation of three-dimensional shapes , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[71]  S. Luck,et al.  Bridging the Gap between Monkey Neurophysiology and Human Perception: An Ambiguity Resolution Theory of Visual Selective Attention , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.