Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students' laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratories

This study investigated the effects of the use of augmented reality (AR) technologies in science laboratories on university students' laboratory skills and attitudes towards laboratories. A quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test control group design was employed. The participants were 76 first-year university students, aged 18-20 years old. They were assigned to either an experimental or a control group. Qualitative and quantitative data collection tools were used. The experimental results obtained following the 5-week application revealed that the AR technology significantly enhanced the development of the university students' laboratory skills. AR technology both improved the students' laboratory skills and helped them to build positive attitudes towards physics laboratories. The statements of the students and the instructor regarding other effects of AR technology on science laboratories, both negative and positive, are also discussed. This study explored the effects of the use of AR in science laboratories.A quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test control group design was employed.AR technology enhanced the development of the university students' laboratory skills.AR technology helped them to build positive attitudes towards physics laboratories.

[1]  Nie-Jia Yau,et al.  Integrating geographical information and augmented reality techniques for mobile escape guidelines on nuclear accident sites. , 2012, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[2]  Rosemary L. Newkirk.  A Comparison of Learner Control and Machine Control Strategies for Computer‐Assisted Instruction , 1973 .

[3]  Jyh-Chong Liang,et al.  Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[4]  J. Fowler.  Use of Computer-Assisted Instruction in Introductory Management Science. , 1983 .

[5]  Chris Dede,et al.  Immersive Interfaces for Engagement and Learning , 2009, Science.

[6]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  An Augmented Reality-based Mobile Learning System to Improve Students' Learning Achievements and Motivations in Natural Science Inquiry Activities , 2014, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[7]  Chris Dede,et al.  EcoMOBILE: Integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Nimet Pirasa,et al.  A Study of Pre-service Teachers’ Tendency for Imprudent Behaviour and Physics Laboratory Attitudes , 2012 .

[9]  J. Ferrer-Torregrosa,et al.  ARBOOK: Development and Assessment of a Tool Based on Augmented Reality for Anatomy , 2015 .

[10]  Xi Zhang,et al.  Applying Cloud Computing Technologies to Upgrade the Resource Configuration of Laboratory Course: The Case of Quality Engineering Education Platform , 2014 .

[11]  Chris Dede,et al.  Affordances and Limitations of Immersive Participatory Augmented Reality Simulations for Teaching and Learning , 2009 .

[12]  Murat Akçayir,et al.  Implementing tablet PCs in schools: Students' attitudes and opinions , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  A. Viera,et al.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. , 2005, Family medicine.

[14]  James D. Slotta,et al.  Exploring Evolutionary Concepts with Immersive Simulations , 2013, CSCL.

[15]  Z. Zacharia,et al.  Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education , 2013, Science.

[16]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  The use of a computer simulation to promote conceptual change: A quasi-experimental study , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[17]  S. Simon,et al.  Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications , 2003 .

[18]  Jie Chao,et al.  The effects of augmented virtual science laboratories on middle school students' understanding of gas properties , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[19]  G. Olympiou,et al.  Blending Physical and Virtual Manipulatives: An Effort to Improve Students' Conceptual Understanding through Science Laboratory Experimentation , 2012 .

[20]  J. Hedberg.  The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning , 2007 .

[21]  Lara M. Triona,et al.  Hands on What? The Relative Effectiveness of Physical versus Virtual Materials in an Engineering Design Project by Middle School Children , 2007 .

[22]  Vineet R. Kamat,et al.  Augmented reality visualization: A review of civil infrastructure system applications , 2015, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[23]  Hirokazu Kato,et al.  Augmented Reality Learning Experiences: Survey of Prototype Design and Evaluation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[24]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Mad City Mystery: Developing Scientific Argumentation Skills with a Place-based Augmented Reality Game on Handheld Computers , 2007 .

[25]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Anywhere Interfaces Using Handheld Augmented Reality , 2012, Computer.

[26]  M. Brian Blake,et al.  Agent-customized training for human learning performance enhancement , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Environmental Detectives—the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations , 2008 .

[28]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[29]  Louis S. Nadelson,et al.  Integration of Video-Based Demonstrations to Prepare Students for the Organic Chemistry Laboratory , 2015 .

[30]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  Students' online interactive patterns in augmented reality-based inquiry activities , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Augmented Reality Simulations on Handheld Computers , 2007 .

[32]  Yongtian Wang,et al.  Teaching based on augmented reality for a technical creative design course , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Sofoklis Sotiriou,et al.  Visualizing the Invisible : Augmented Reality as an Innovative Science Education Scheme , 2008 .

[34]  Min-Chai Hsieh,et al.  Establishment and Usability Evaluation of an Interactive AR Learning System on Conservation of Fish , 2011 .

[35]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality , 2003, Comput. Graph..

[36]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[37]  Theodore F. Wiesner,et al.  Comparison of Student Learning in Physical and Simulated Unit Operations Experiments , 2004 .

[38]  Li Liu,et al.  The auxiliary role of information technology in teaching: enhancing programming course using alice , 2014 .

[39]  Rosemary Luckin,et al.  “Making it real”: exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science , 2006, Virtual Reality.

[40]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  Recent Advances in Augmented Reality , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[41]  Georgios Olympiou,et al.  Making the invisible visible: enhancing students’ conceptual understanding by introducing representations of abstract objects in a simulation , 2013 .

[42]  T. P. Caudell,et al.  Augmented reality: an application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes , 1992, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[43]  Paul A Howard-Jones,et al.  Applying the science of learning in the classroom , 2018 .

[44]  Oliver Müller,et al.  Augmented reality in informal learning environments: A field experiment in a mathematics exhibition , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[45]  Tina Jarvis,et al.  Factors influencing elementary school children's attitudes toward science before, during, and after a visit to the UK National Space Centre , 2005 .

[46]  Ann M. L. Cavallo,et al.  Students' Science Perceptions and Enrollment Decisions in Differing Learning Cycle Classrooms. , 2001 .

[47]  Patricia Ordóñez de Pablos,et al.  Culture effects on the knowledge sharing in multi-national virtual classes: A mixed method , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[48]  Min Wu,et al.  Augmented Reality in the Higher Education: Students’ Science Concept Learning and Academic Achievement in Astronomy , 2013 .

[49]  Min Jou,et al.  Ubiquitous tutoring in laboratories based on wireless sensor networks , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[50]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[51]  Selahattin Gönen,et al.  A Study on Student Teachers’ Misconceptions and Scientifically Acceptable Conceptions About Mass and Gravity , 2008 .

[52]  Davide Taibi,et al.  A framework to support educational decision making in mobile learning , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[53]  Hala H. Zayed,et al.  ARSC: Augmented Reality Student Card , 2010, 2010 International Computer Engineering Conference (ICENCO).

[54]  Hannah Thinyane,et al.  Are digital natives a world-wide phenomenon? An investigation into South African first year students' use and experience with technology , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[55]  Chih-Ming Chen,et al.  Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[56]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Affordances of Augmented Reality in Science Learning: Suggestions for Future Research , 2012, Journal of Science Education and Technology.

[57]  Manuel Castro,et al.  New technology trends in education: Seven years of forecasts and convergence , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[58]  G. Olympiou,et al.  Physical versus Virtual Manipulative Experimentation in Physics Learning. , 2011 .

[59]  Xu Wang,et al.  A case study of Augmented Reality simulation system application in a chemistry course , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[60]  Z. C. Zacharia,et al.  Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort to enhance students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[61]  Hsiu-Ling Chen,et al.  Learning differences and eye fixation patterns in virtual and physical science laboratories , 2015, Comput. Educ..