Construing the Essence: The Effects of Construal Level on Genetic Attributions for Individual and Social Group Differences

The present research links a nonsocial, contextual influence (construal level) to the tendency to endorse genetic attributions for individual and social group differences. Studies 1 to 3 show that people thinking in an abstract (vs. concrete) mind-set score higher on a measure of genetic attributions for individual and racial group differences. Study 4 showed that abstract (vs. concrete) construal also increased genetic attributions for novel groups. Study 5 explored the potential downstream consequences of construal on intergroup attitudes, and found that abstract (vs. concrete) construal led people to endorse genetic attributions in general and this was associated with increased anti-Black prejudice.

[1]  Rachna,et al.  Sapiens: A brief history of humankind , 2017 .

[2]  Jin X. Goh,et al.  Mini Meta-Analysis of Your Own Studies: Some Arguments on Why and a Primer on How , 2016 .

[3]  Andrei Cimpian,et al.  The inherence heuristic: An intuitive means of making sense of the world, and a potential precursor to psychological essentialism , 2014, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  George E. Newman,et al.  The effects of system-justifying motives on endorsement of essentialist explanations for gender differences. , 2013, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Jaime L. Napier,et al.  Of two minds: The interactive effect of construal level and identity on political polarization , 2013 .

[6]  Nick Haslam,et al.  Biogenetic explanations and stigma: a meta-analytic review of associations among laypeople. , 2013, Social science & medicine.

[7]  Marlone D. Henderson,et al.  There Are Many Ways to See the Forest for the Trees , 2013, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[8]  Jesse L. Preston,et al.  Polarized Attitudes Toward the Ground Zero Mosque are Reduced by High-Level Construal , 2013 .

[9]  Y. Trope,et al.  What happens why? Psychological distance and focusing on causes versus consequences of events. , 2013, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Jaime L. Napier,et al.  Moral Mind-Sets , 2013 .

[11]  Jamie B Luguri,et al.  Reconstruing Intolerance , 2012, Psychological science.

[12]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  Temporal Distance and Discrimination , 2012, Psychological science.

[13]  S. Heine,et al.  Genetic essentialism: on the deceptive determinism of DNA. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  J. Keller,et al.  Essentialism goes social: belief in social determinism as a component of psychological essentialism. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  A. Roets,et al.  The role of need for closure in essentialist entitativity beliefs and prejudice: an epistemic needs approach to racial categorization. , 2011, The British journal of social psychology.

[16]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Creating distinct implicit and explicit attitudes with an illusory correlation paradigm , 2010 .

[17]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal-level theory of psychological distance. , 2010, Psychological review.

[18]  Marlone D. Henderson.  Psychological Distance and Group Judgments: The Effect of Physical Distance on Beliefs about Common Goals , 2009, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[19]  Bruce G. Link,et al.  The Politics of the Gene: Social Status and Beliefs about Genetics for Individual Outcomes , 2009, Social psychology quarterly.

[20]  T. Postmes,et al.  Theorizing gender in the face of social change: is there anything essential about essentialism? , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  T. Postmes,et al.  When Differences Become Essential: Minority Essentialism in Response to Majority Treatment , 2009, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[22]  Ying-yi Hong,et al.  Lay theory of race affects and moderates Asian Americans' responses toward American culture. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Frank C Keil,et al.  Where is the essence? Developmental shifts in children's beliefs about internal features. , 2008, Child development.

[24]  Melissa J. Williams,et al.  Biological conceptions of race and the motivation to cross racial boundaries. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  N. Haslam,et al.  Human Natures: Psychological Essentialism in Thinking about Differences between People , 2008 .

[26]  P. Hegarty,et al.  Attributional Beliefs About the Controllability of Stigmatized Traits: Antecedents or Justifications of Prejudice? , 2008 .

[27]  John T. Jost,et al.  Stereotypes in Our Culture , 2008 .

[28]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Psychological Essentialism of Human Categories , 2007 .

[29]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[30]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Construal levels and self-control. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Predicting the near and distant future. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[32]  N. Haslam,et al.  Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement , 2006 .

[33]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Essentializing Differences Between Women and Men , 2006, Psychological science.

[34]  M. Zanna,et al.  Establishing a causal chain: why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  S. Heine,et al.  Psychological universals: what are they and how can we know? , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  J. Keller.  In genes we trust: the biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Y. Trope,et al.  The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others' self-regulatory efforts ☆ , 2004 .

[38]  S. Kardia,et al.  Exploring the Public Understanding of Basic Genetic Concepts , 2004, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[39]  M. LaFrance,et al.  The Correlates and Consequences of Newspaper Reports of Research on Sex Differences , 2004, Psychological science.

[40]  John A. Lynch,et al.  The Role of “Genetics” in Popular Understandings of Race in the United States , 2004, Public understanding of science.

[41]  B. D. Orey.  White Racial Attitudes and Support for the Mississippi State Flag , 2004 .

[42]  S. Gelman,et al.  The Essential Child : Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought , 2003 .

[43]  N. Haslam,et al.  Are essentialist beliefs associated with prejudice? , 2002, The British journal of social psychology.

[44]  V. Yzerbyt,et al.  The Interplay of Subjective Essentialism and Entitativity in the Formation of Stereotypes , 2001 .

[45]  N. Haslam,et al.  Essentialist beliefs about social categories. , 2000, The British journal of social psychology.

[46]  Saul Dubow,et al.  Scientific racism in modern South Africa , 1996 .

[47]  C. Martin,et al.  Folk Theories about Sex and Race Differences , 1995 .

[48]  J. Brigham,et al.  College Students’ Racial Attitudes , 1993 .

[49]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. , 1989 .

[50]  Joshua Knobe,et al.  Beliefs About the True Self Explain Asymmetries Based on Moral Judgment , 2015, Cogn. Sci..

[51]  Sean M. McCrea,et al.  Construal level mind-sets moderate self- and social stereotyping. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  Richard F. Martell,et al.  Male-female differences: A computer simulation. , 1996 .

[53]  Anne Maass,et al.  Linguistic Intergroup Bias: Stereotype Perpetuation Through Language , 1999 .

[54]  S. Fiske,et al.  What's so special about sex? Gender stereotyping and discrimination. , 1993 .

[55]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  When small effects are impressive , 1992 .

[56]  H. Birx,et al.  The Mismeasure of Man , 1981 .