Early prediction of the long term evolution of multiple sclerosis: the Bayesian Risk Estimate for Multiple Sclerosis (BREMS) score

Aim: To propose a simple tool for early prediction of unfavourable long term evolution of multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: A Bayesian model allowed us to calculate, within the first year of disease and for each patient, the Bayesian Risk Estimate for MS (BREMS) score that represents the risk of reaching secondary progression (SP). Results: The median BREMS scores were higher in 158 patients who reached SP within 10 years compared with 1087 progression free patients (0.69 vs 0.30; p<0.0001). The BREMS value was related to SP risk in the whole cohort (p<0.0001) and in the subgroup of 535 patients who had never been treated with immune therapies, thus reasonably representing the natural history of the disease (p<0.000001). Conclusions: The BREMS score may be useful both to identify patients who are candidates for early or for more aggressive therapies and to improve the design and analysis of clinical therapeutic trials and of observational studies.

[1]  Carlo Berzuini,et al.  Predicting secondary progression in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: a Bayesian analysis , 2001, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[2]  J. Baskerville,et al.  The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 7. Progressive-relapsing and relapsing-progressive multiple sclerosis: a re-evaluation. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  J. Baskerville,et al.  The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 5. The clinical features and natural history of primary progressive multiple sclerosis. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  P. Adeleine,et al.  Early clinical predictors and progression of irreversible disability in multiple sclerosis: an amnesic process. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  B Bass,et al.  The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. I. Clinical course and disability. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  J. G. Phadke Clinical aspects of multiple sclerosis in north-east Scotland with particular reference to its course and prognosis. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  P. Flachenecker Disease-modifying drugs for the early treatment of multiple sclerosis , 2004, Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics.

[8]  G. Serio,et al.  Multivariate analysis of predictive factors of multiple sclerosis course with a validated method to assess clinical events. , 1995, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[9]  J. Kurtzke Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis , 1983, Neurology.

[10]  Gianfranco Siracusa,et al.  A prospective study on the natural history of multiple sclerosis: clues to the conduct and interpretation of clinical trials , 1999, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[11]  B. Weinshenker,et al.  Not every patient with multiple sclerosis should be treated at time of diagnosis. , 2006, Archives of neurology.

[12]  O. Andersen,et al.  Prognostic factors in a multiple sclerosis incidence cohort with twenty-five years of follow-up. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  B. Weinshenker Bayesian analysis: what does it add to studies of the natural history of MS? , 2001, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[14]  B Bass,et al.  The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 2. Predictive value of the early clinical course. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Cristiana Larizza,et al.  A Unified Approach for Modeling Longitudinal and Failure Time Data, With Application in Medical Monitoring , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[16]  D. Silberberg,et al.  New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols , 1983, Annals of neurology.

[17]  G. Ebers Prognostic factors for multiple sclerosis: the importance of natural history studies , 2005, Journal of Neurology.