Population Based Cancer Screening Programmes as a Teachable Moment for Primary Prevention Interventions. A Review of the Literature

Background and aim: Unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, and smoking are key risk factors for the major non-communicable diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes. The screening procedure may represent an ideal setting for promoting healthy lifestyles as it represents a time when subjects are probably more inclined to consider a relationship between their own habits and their effects on health. The aim of this study is to review available evidence concerning interventions combining screening and primary prevention interventions, aimed at promoting the adoption of healthy lifestyles. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE and Cochrane library electronic databases for intervention studies of primary prevention interventions implemented in the context of established screening programmes, or of pilot screening projects, where the study design included a comparison group. Results: Comprehensive interventions are acceptable for asymptomatic subjects targeted for cancer screening, can result in improvements and may be cost–effective. A positive impact of these interventions in favoring the adoption of cancer protective dietary behaviors was observed in all studies. Conflicting results were instead reported with respect to physical activity, while no impact could be observed for interventions aimed to favor smoking cessation. Conclusions: The retrieved studies suggest that the screening setting may offer valuable opportunities to provide credible, potentially persuasive life style advice, reaching a wide audience. A multiple risk factor approach may maximize the benefit of behavioral change, as the same health related habits are associated not only with cancers targeted by screening interventions, but also with other cancers, coronary artery disease, and other chronic conditions, while unhealthy behaviors may be mutually reinforcing. In order to cover a maximum number of possibilities, health education programmes should include multiple strategies, integrating and combining models of individual, social, and environmental change.

[1]  J. Fries Frailty, heart disease, and stroke: the Compression of Morbidity paradigm. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[2]  M. Kreuter,et al.  Applications workbook to accompany health promotion planning : an educational and ecological approach , 1999 .

[3]  S. Swensen,et al.  Effectiveness of smoking cessation self-help materials in a lung cancer screening population. , 2004, Lung cancer.

[4]  A. Anderson,et al.  Understanding the potential and challenges of adenoma treatment as a prevention opportunity: Insights from the BeWEL formative study , 2012, Preventive medicine.

[5]  C. McBride,et al.  Evaluation of a minimal self-help smoking cessation intervention following cervical cancer screening. , 1999, Preventive medicine.

[6]  A. Coldman,et al.  Comparison of nonbreast cancer incidence, survival and mortality between breast screening program participants and nonparticipants , 2008, International journal of cancer.

[7]  M. Thun,et al.  Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. , 2004, IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans.

[8]  K. Pickett,et al.  Health promotion at NHS breast cancer screening clinics in the UK. , 2007, Health promotion international.

[9]  S. Woolford,et al.  Understanding the role of cancer worry in creating a "teachable moment" for multiple risk factor reduction. , 2008, Social science & medicine.

[10]  J. Wardle,et al.  Study protocol for BeWEL: The impact of a BodyWEight and physicaL activity intervention on adults at risk of developing colorectal adenomas , 2011, BMC public health.

[11]  E. Clipp,et al.  Project PREVENT: A Randomized Trial to Reduce Multiple Behavioral Risk Factors for Colon Cancer , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[12]  G. Carreras,et al.  The Pap smear screening as an occasion for smoking cessation and physical activity counselling: baseline characteristics of women involved in the SPRINT randomized controlled trial , 2011, BMC public health.

[13]  S. Flocke,et al.  Teachable moments for health behavior change: a concept analysis. , 2009, Patient education and counseling.

[14]  L. Holmberg,et al.  A 9-Year Follow-up Study of Participants and Nonparticipants in Sigmoidoscopy Screening: Importance of Self-Selection , 2008, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[15]  K. Emmons,et al.  Understanding the potential of teachable moments: the case of smoking cessation. , 2003, Health education research.

[16]  J. Wardle,et al.  Predictors of attendance in the United Kingdom flexible sigmoidoscopy screening trial , 2000, Journal of medical screening.

[17]  L. Cox,et al.  Lung cancer screening as a teachable moment for smoking cessation. , 2007, Lung cancer.

[18]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  The effectiveness of a computer-tailored smoking cessation intervention for participants in lung cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial. , 2012, Lung cancer.

[19]  W. Rakowski,et al.  Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. , 1994, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[20]  J. Wardle,et al.  The impact of individually-tailored lifestyle advice in the colorectal cancer screening context: a randomised pilot study in North-West London. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[21]  L. Seeff,et al.  Colorectal cancer-screening tests and associated health behaviors. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.

[22]  J. Wardle,et al.  Increasing fruit and vegetable intake among adults attending colorectal cancer screening: the efficacy of a brief tailored intervention. , 2002, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[23]  J. Wardle,et al.  The effects of colorectal cancer screening on health attitudes and practices. , 2003, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[24]  G. Hoff,et al.  Impact of colorectal cancer screening on future lifestyle choices: a three-year randomized controlled trial. , 2007, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[25]  廣畑 富雄,et al.  Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective , 2007 .

[26]  H. D. Koning,et al.  Does participation to screening unintentionally influence lifestyle behaviour and thus lifestyle-related morbidity? , 2010 .

[27]  H. Hansen,et al.  Lung cancer. , 1990, Cancer chemotherapy and biological response modifiers.

[28]  D. Golden-Kreutz,et al.  Psychologic intervention improves survival for breast cancer patients , 2008, Cancer.

[29]  Colleen M McBride,et al.  Prevalence and predictors of multiple behavioral risk factors for colon cancer. , 2005, Preventive medicine.

[30]  Lawrence W. Green,et al.  Health Program Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach , 2004 .

[31]  R. Steele,et al.  Bowel health to better health: a minimal contact lifestyle intervention for people at increased risk of colorectal cancer , 2009, British Journal of Nutrition.