Analyzing the Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale in Vehicle Crashes by Using a Logistic Normal Model

This paper presents a model centered on the estimation of the maximum abbreviated injury scale–based injury predicting models by using a logistic normal model with random effects. The study identified energy equivalent speed, collision type, crash year, location, driver's age, and gender for the analysis of the gravity in vehicle crashes. The study showed that the collision type variable was modeled better by random effects than by fixed effects and that energy equivalent speed, crash year, location, driver's age, and gender were contributing factors with fixed effects to the injury severity. Therefore, the authors took advantage of the mixed logit model's ability to account for unobserved effects that are difficult to quantify and may affect the model estimation. Crashes from the database of detailed studies of personal accidents occurring from 1991 to 2010 in France were used. The estimation of the parameters (fixed and random effects) was performed by several approximation methods. Energy equivalent speed was found to be, by far, the most significant variable. If drivers age 75 and older were considered as a reference, drivers in the 25-to-34 age bracket were significant contributors and were followed by those in the 35-to-44 age bracket and then by those in the 55-to-65 age bracket. In addition, vehicles that crashed between 1995 and 1999 were more significant contributors than were those in the reference period, 1991 to 1994. For assessment of the performance of the model proposed, a binary logit model was compared with the mixed logit by means of cross validation. The obtained results revealed that the logistic normal mixed model is preferred because it detects more vehicle crashes with serious injuries than does the classic logistic regression model.

[1]  Daniel Commenges,et al.  Generalized Score Test of Homogeneity Based on Correlated Random Effects Models , 1997 .

[2]  D. Yagil Gender and age-related differences in attitudes toward traffic laws and traffic violations , 1998 .

[3]  J. Pinheiro,et al.  Efficient Laplacian and Adaptive Gaussian Quadrature Algorithms for Multilevel Generalized Linear Mixed Models , 2006 .

[4]  N. Longford A fast scoring algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation in unbalanced mixed models with nested random effects , 1987 .

[5]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives , 2010 .

[6]  Fred L Mannering,et al.  Highway accident severities and the mixed logit model: an exploratory empirical analysis. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  R. Haynes,et al.  Geographical variations in mortality and morbidity from road traffic accidents in England and Wales. , 2008, Health & place.

[8]  P. Blockey,et al.  Aberrant driving behaviour: errors and violations. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[9]  N. Breslow,et al.  Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models , 1993 .

[10]  N P Gregersen,et al.  Lifestyle and accidents among young drivers. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Mingan Yang,et al.  Bayesian variable selection for logistic mixed model with nonparametric random effects , 2012, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[12]  W. Brouwer,et al.  Driving competence in older persons. , 1994, Disability and rehabilitation.

[13]  Gudmundur F. Ulfarsson,et al.  A note on modeling pedestrian-injury severity in motor-vehicle crashes with the mixed logit model. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Fred L Mannering,et al.  An empirical assessment of fixed and random parameter logit models using crash- and non-crash-specific injury data. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  D. Rubin,et al.  Estimation in Covariance Components Models , 1981 .

[16]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  Improved Approximations for Multilevel Models with Binary Responses , 1996 .

[17]  F. Zeidler,et al.  Accident Research and Accident Reconstruction by the EES-Accident Reconstruction Method , 1985 .

[18]  Gudmundur F. Ulfarsson,et al.  Differences in male and female injury severities in sport-utility vehicle, minivan, pickup and passenger car accidents. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Kelvin K. W. Yau,et al.  Conditional Akaike information criterion for generalized linear mixed models , 2012, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[20]  Sujuan Gao Combining binomial data using the logistic normal model , 2004 .

[21]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Maximum Likelihood for Generalized Linear Models with Nested Random Effects via High-Order, Multivariate Laplace Approximation , 2000 .

[22]  F. Mannering,et al.  Driver aging and its effect on male and female single-vehicle accident injuries: some additional evidence. , 2006, Journal of safety research.

[23]  D. Bates,et al.  Newton-Raphson and EM Algorithms for Linear Mixed-Effects Models for Repeated-Measures Data , 1988 .

[24]  Mollie E. Brooks,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  Sveinung Eiksund,et al.  A geographical perspective on driving attitudes and behaviour among young adults in urban and rural Norway , 2009 .

[26]  A. S. Al-Ghamdi Using logistic regression to estimate the influence of accident factors on accident severity. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  D. McFadden,et al.  MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSE , 2000 .

[28]  Young-Jun Kweon,et al.  Driver injury severity: an application of ordered probit models. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Torbjørn Rundmo,et al.  Attitudes towards traffic safety, driving behaviour and accident involvement among the Norwegian public , 2004, Ergonomics.

[30]  J. Booth,et al.  Maximizing generalized linear mixed model likelihoods with an automated Monte Carlo EM algorithm , 1999 .

[31]  Nicholas T. Longford,et al.  Random Coefficient Models , 1994, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.