Applying risk tolerance and socio-technical dynamics for more realistic energy transition pathways
暂无分享,去创建一个
Mitchell J. Small | Gabrielle Wong-Parodi | Ahmed Abdulla | Turner Cotterman | Stephen Wilson | A. Abdulla | M. Small | T. Cotterman | G. Wong‐Parodi | Stephen J. Wilson | Turner Cotterman
[1] Simon Buckle,et al. Mitigation of climate change , 2009, The Daunting Climate Change.
[2] Rebecca Ford,et al. Reaching a 1.5°C target: socio-technical challenges for a rapid transition to low-carbon electricity systems , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[3] S. Bolwig,et al. Climate-friendly but socially rejected energy-transition pathways: The integration of techno-economic and socio-technical approaches in the Nordic-Baltic region , 2020 .
[4] D. Sornette,et al. Towards Safer and More Sustainable Ways for Exploiting Nuclear Power , 2020, World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology.
[5] F. Creutzig,et al. The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change , 2017, Nature Energy.
[6] Paul Upham,et al. Towards a cross-paradigmatic framework of the social acceptance of energy systems , 2015 .
[7] John P. Weyant,et al. The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies , 2014, Climatic Change.
[8] D. Gattie,et al. The role of U.S. nuclear power in the 21st century , 2018, The Electricity Journal.
[9] Alexander L. Davis,et al. A decision science approach for integrating social science in climate and energy solutions , 2016 .
[10] Frans Berkhout,et al. Evaluating sustainability transitions pathways: Bridging analytical approaches to address governance challenges , 2015 .
[11] S. Ruutu,et al. Prospects of modelling societal transitions : position paper of an emerging community , 2015 .
[12] Karoline S. Rogge,et al. Aligning integrated assessment modelling with socio-technical transition insights: An application to low-carbon energy scenario analysis in Europe , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
[13] Jochen Markard,et al. Destined for decline? Examining nuclear energy from a technological innovation systems perspective , 2020 .
[14] Sonia Yeh,et al. Formalizing best practice for energy system optimization modelling , 2017 .
[15] Bjørn Lomborg. Impact of Current Climate Proposals , 2016 .
[16] M. G. Morgan,et al. US nuclear power: The vanishing low-carbon wedge , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[17] J. Edmonds,et al. Improved representation of investment decisions in assessments of CO 2 mitigation , 2015 .
[18] Didier Sornette,et al. Reassessing the safety of nuclear power , 2016 .
[19] Gert Jan Kramer,et al. No quick switch to low-carbon energy , 2009, Nature.
[20] D. S. Siqueira,et al. Current perspectives on nuclear energy as a global climate change mitigation option , 2018, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.
[21] David Reiner,et al. Learning through a portfolio of carbon capture and storage demonstration projects , 2016, Nature Energy.
[22] S. Wheeler,et al. Is social licence a response to government and market failures? Evidence from the literature , 2020 .
[23] G. Luderer,et al. Assessment of wind and solar power in global low-carbon energy scenarios: An introduction , 2017 .
[24] François Lévêque,et al. How Fukushima Dai-ichi core meltdown changed the probability of nuclear accidents , 2014 .
[25] Peta Ashworth,et al. Societal acceptance of wind farms: Analysis of four common themes across Australian case studies , 2013 .
[26] Jesse D. Jenkins,et al. A critical review of global decarbonization scenarios: what do they tell us about feasibility? , 2015 .
[27] Brian Ó Gallachóir,et al. Long‐term energy models: Principles, characteristics, focus, and limitations , 2013 .
[28] D. Budescu,et al. Behavioral Science Tools to Strengthen Energy & Environmental Policy , 2017, Behavioral Science & Policy.
[29] S. Hoedl. A Social License for Nuclear Technologies , 2020, Nuclear Non-Proliferation in International Law - Volume IV.
[30] S. Alameri,et al. Harmonizing nuclear and renewable energy: Case studies , 2019, International Journal of Energy Research.
[31] Neil Strachan,et al. A review of socio-technical energy transition (STET) models , 2015 .
[32] Michael Siegrist,et al. How a Nuclear Power Plant Accident Influences Acceptance of Nuclear Power: Results of a Longitudinal Study Before and After the Fukushima Disaster , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[33] M. Ramana. Nuclear power and the public , 2011 .
[34] N. Nakicenovic,et al. A roadmap for rapid decarbonization , 2017, Science.
[35] N. Bronfman,et al. Understanding social acceptance of electricity generation sources , 2012 .
[36] Wonjoon Kim,et al. Effect of the Fukushima nuclear disaster on global public acceptance of nuclear energy , 2013 .
[37] A. Weinberg. The maturity and future of nuclear energy , 1976 .
[38] Benjamin A. Lyons,et al. Proximity (Mis)perception: Public Awareness of Nuclear, Refinery, and Fracking Sites , 2019, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[39] F. J. Rijnsoever,et al. Public acceptance of energy technologies : The effects of labeling, time, and heterogeneity in a discrete choice experiment , 2015 .
[40] S. Sorrell,et al. Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization , 2017, Science.
[41] Armond Cohen,et al. China-U.S. cooperation to advance nuclear power , 2016, Science.
[42] Mark E. Borsuk,et al. Agent-based modeling of climate policy: An introduction to the ENGAGE multi-level model framework , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..
[43] M. Sahakian,et al. A review of linking models and socio-technical transitions theories for energy and climate solutions , 2020, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.
[44] Adam Hawkes,et al. Energy systems modeling for twenty-first century energy challenges , 2014 .
[45] John Eyles,et al. ‘Technical breaches’ and ‘eroding margins of safety’ – Rhetoric and reality of the nuclear industry in Canada , 2012 .
[46] Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al. Construction Cost Overruns and Electricity Infrastructure: An Unavoidable Risk? , 2014 .
[47] Jiyong Eom,et al. Diffusion of low-carbon technologies and the feasibility of long-term climate targets , 2015 .
[48] Mitchell J. Small,et al. Generating linked technology-socioeconomic scenarios for emerging energy transitions , 2019, Applied Energy.
[49] Keywan Riahi,et al. A new scenario framework for Climate Change Research: scenario matrix architecture , 2014, Climatic Change.
[50] Frans Berkhout,et al. Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions , 2016 .
[51] David M. Konisky,et al. Energy infrastructure, NIMBYism, and public opinion: a systematic literature review of three decades of empirical survey literature , 2020, Environmental Research Letters.
[52] Elmar Kriegler,et al. Getting from here to there – energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenarios , 2014, Climatic Change.
[53] Seoyong Kim,et al. Comparative Analysis of Public Attitudes toward Nuclear Power Energy across 27 European Countries by Applying the Multilevel Model , 2018 .
[54] Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .
[55] S. Kristiansen,et al. Environmental Debates over Nuclear Energy: Media, Communication, and the Public , 2019, Environmental Communication.
[56] John Surrey,et al. Opposition to nuclear power : A review of international experience , 1976 .
[57] Holly Jean Buck,et al. Rapid scale-up of negative emissions technologies: social barriers and social implications , 2016, Climatic Change.
[58] Carol L. Silva,et al. Tracking the nuclear ‘mood’ in the United States: Introducing a long term measure of public opinion about nuclear energy using aggregate survey data , 2019, Energy Policy.
[59] D. Victor,et al. Limits to deployment of nuclear power for decarbonization: Insights from public opinion , 2019, Energy Policy.
[60] P. Newell,et al. The politics of accelerating low-carbon transitions: Towards a new research agenda , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.
[61] Matthew C. Nisbet,et al. Climate change, cultural cognition, and media effects: Worldviews drive news selectivity, biased processing, and polarized attitudes , 2018, Public understanding of science.
[62] Yue Guo,et al. Government communication effectiveness on local acceptance of nuclear power: Evidence from China , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.
[63] J. DeCarolis,et al. US Energy-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Absence of Federal Climate Policy. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.
[64] Pushker A Kharecha,et al. Prevented mortality and greenhouse gas emissions from historical and projected nuclear power. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.
[65] L. Steg,et al. Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework , 2012 .
[66] Joseph F. DeCarolis,et al. Modeling for insight using Tools for Energy Model Optimization and Analysis (Temoa) , 2013 .
[67] Son Kim,et al. Nuclear energy response in the EMF27 study , 2014, Climatic Change.
[68] A. Grubler,et al. Future capacity growth of energy technologies: are scenarios consistent with historical evidence? , 2013, Climatic Change.
[69] M. Hill,et al. A wedge or a weight? Critically examining nuclear power’s viability as a low carbon energy source from an intergenerational perspective , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.
[70] Mark Z. Jacobson,et al. How much wind power potential does europe have? Examining european wind power potential with an enhanced socio-technical atlas , 2019, Energy Policy.