Timing of preparatory landing responses as a function of availability of optic flow information.

This study investigated temporal patterns of EMG activity during self-initiated falls with different optic flow information ('gaze directions'). Onsets of EMG during the flight phase were monitored from five experienced volunteers that completed 72 landings in three gaze directions (downward, mid-range and horizontal) and six heights of fall (10-130 cm). EMG recordings were obtained from the right gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, biceps femoris and rectus femoris muscles, and used to determine the latency of onset (L(o)) and the perceived time to contact (T(c)). Impacts at touchdown were also monitored using as estimates the major peak of the vertical ground reaction forces (F(max)) normalized to body mass, time to peak (T(max)), peak impulse (I(norm)) normalized to momentum, and rate of change of force (dF(max)/dt). Results showed that L(o) was longer as heights of fall increased, but remained within a narrow time-window at >50 cm landings. No significant differences in L(o) were observed when gaze direction was changed. The relationship between T(c) and flight time followed a linear trend regardless of gaze direction. Gaze direction did not significantly affect the landing impacts. In conclusion, availability of optic flow during landing does not play a major role in triggering the preparatory muscle actions in self-initiated falls. Once a structured landing plan has been acquired, the relevant muscles respond relative to the start of the fall.

[1]  Charles B. Walter,et al.  Temporal quantification of electromyography with reference to motor control research , 1984 .

[2]  M. Goodale,et al.  Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape , 2003, Nature.

[3]  S. Chatterjee,et al.  Regression Analysis by Example , 1979 .

[4]  Janet S Dufek,et al.  Classification and comparison of biomechanical response strategies for accommodating landing impact. , 2003, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[5]  Dario G. Liebermann,et al.  Chapter 14 Time to Contact as a Determiner of Action: Vision and Motor Control , 1992 .

[6]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[7]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Exploring A Law-Based, Ecological Approach to Skilled Action , 1988 .

[8]  Adamantios Arampatzis,et al.  The effect of falling height on muscle activity and foot motion during landings. , 2003, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[9]  B. Nigg,et al.  Biomechanics of the musculo-skeletal system , 1995 .

[10]  J H Challis,et al.  Visual and non‐visual control of landing movements in humans , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  Svetha Venkatesh,et al.  How honeybees make grazing landings on flat surfaces , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[12]  D. Goodman,et al.  Effects of visual guidance on the reduction of impacts during landings. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[13]  J. Tresilian.  Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Lee Dn,et al.  The optic flow field: the foundation of vision. , 1980 .

[15]  A. Colley,et al.  Cognition and action in skilled behaviour , 1988 .

[16]  P. Dyhre‐Poulsen,et al.  Programmed electromyographic activity and negative incremental muscle stiffness in monkeys jumping downward. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  R. J. Gregor,et al.  Responses of elbow extensors to landing forces during jump downs in cats , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  R Greenwood,et al.  Muscle responses during sudden falls in man. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  R Greenwood,et al.  Landing from an unexpected fall and a voluntary step. , 1976, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  David N. Lee,et al.  Plummeting gannets: a paradigm of ecological optics , 1981, Nature.

[21]  M. Laurent,et al.  Visual Cues and Processes Involved in Goal-Directed Locomotion , 1991 .

[22]  P. McLeod,et al.  Psychophysics: How fielders arrive in time to catch the ball , 2003, Nature.

[23]  Digby Elliott,et al.  Vision and motor control , 1992 .

[24]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Tutorials in Motor Behavior , 1980 .

[25]  E Brenner,et al.  Is Judging Time-to-Contact Based on ‘Tau’? , 1996, Perception.

[26]  J. Tresilian.  Perceptual Information for the Timing of Interceptive Action , 1990, Perception.

[27]  G. Davis,et al.  Visual Timing of Muscle Preactivation in Preparation for Landing , 1989 .

[28]  H. Wagner.  Flow-field variables trigger landing in flies , 1982, Nature.

[29]  V. Dietz,et al.  Pre-innervation and stretch responses of triceps bracchii in man falling with and without visual control , 1978, Brain Research.

[30]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[31]  Dario G Liebermann,et al.  A DIRECT APPROACH TO LANDING IN HUMANS: IMPLICATIONS OF THE TIME-TO-CONTACT VARIABLE AS A MODULATOR OF THE VOLUNTARY TIMING RESPONSE DURING FREE-FALLS. , 1988 .

[32]  G. Jones,et al.  Muscular control of landing from unexpected falls in man , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  D. Newman,et al.  Altered astronaut lower limb and mass center kinematics in downward jumping following space flight , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.