Decision support system for the long-term city metabolism planning problem

A Decision Support System (DSS) tool for the assessment of intervention strategies (Alternatives) in an Urban Water System (UWS) with an integral simulation model called “WaterMet²” is presented. The DSS permits the user to identify one or more optimal Alternatives over a fixed long-term planning horizon using performance metrics mapped to the TRUST sustainability criteria (Alegre et al., 2012). The DSS exposes lists of in-built intervention options and system performance metrics for the user to compose new Alternatives. The quantitative metrics are calculated by the WaterMet² model and further qualitative or user-defined metrics may be specified by the user or by external tools feeding into the DSS. A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) approach is employed within the DSS to compare the defined Alternatives and to rank them with respect to a pre-specified weighting scheme for different Scenarios. Two rich, interactive Graphical User Interfaces, one desktop and one web-based, are employed to assist with guiding the end user through the stages of defining the problem, evaluating and ranking Alternatives. This mechanism provides a useful tool for decision makers to compare different strategies for the planning of UWS with respect to multiple Scenarios. The efficacy of the DSS is demonstrated on a northern European case study inspired by a real-life urban water system for a mixture of quantitative and qualitative criteria. The results demonstrate how the DSS, integrated with an UWS modelling approach, can be used to assist planners in meeting their long-term, strategic level sustainability objectives.

[1]  R. G. Mein,et al.  Modelling the urban water cycle , 2001, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  Modelling metabolism based performance of an urban water system using WaterMet2 , 2015 .

[3]  Christos Makropoulos,et al.  Source to tap urban water cycle modelling , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[4]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process : planning, priority setting, resource allocation , 1980 .

[5]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  Urban water system metabolism assessment using WaterMet2 model , 2014 .

[6]  Helena Alegre,et al.  Framework for Sustainability Assessment of UWCS and development of a self-assessment tool , 2014 .

[7]  Rae Mackay,et al.  SWITCH city water balance: a scoping model for integrated urban water management , 2010 .

[8]  Helge Brattebø,et al.  Dynamic metabolism modelling of urban water services--demonstrating effectiveness as a decision-support tool for Oslo, Norway. , 2014, Water research.

[9]  S. Liu,et al.  Decision support for sustainable option selection in integrated urban water management , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[10]  G Kuczera,et al.  Integrated urban water cycle management: the UrbanCycle model. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  Integrated Decision Support Framework , 2012 .

[12]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  Advantages of integrated and sustainability based assessment for metabolism based strategic planning of urban water systems. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  F A Memon,et al.  Performance of a large building rainwater harvesting system. , 2012, Water research.

[14]  J. O'Sullivan,et al.  A decision support tool for sustainable planning of urban water systems: presenting the Dynamic Urban Water Simulation Model. , 2013, Water research.

[15]  Kourosh Behzadian,et al.  Oslo Case Study Report , 2013 .