Interactions in ICT4D Projects: A Sociotechnical Perspective

Stakeholder interactions play a vital role in achieving project outcomes. The role of stakeholders in Information and Communication technology for Development (ICT4D) is often overlooked or ineffective. This hinders ICT4D projects or in some scenarios may adversely affect the project. The current paper proposes to use Actor Network Theory (ANT) to unpack these interactions not only among stakeholders but extend it further to include technology, thereby creating a holistic understanding of the phenomenon. An ICT4D initiative in India was analyzed using ANT logic to explain stakeholder interactions and behaviors. The findings from this research enable better understanding of interactions and also explain the effect of these interactions on ICT4D project activities, other stakeholders and networks. It also enables a better insight into the behavior of stakeholders and contribution of interactions between them in attaining the mutual desired outcomes in ICT4D projects.

[1]  Uduak A. Okon,et al.  ICT for Rural Community Development: Implementing the Communicative Ecology Framework in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria , 2015, Information Technology for Development.

[2]  Caroline Pade-Khene,et al.  Complexity of Stakeholder Interaction in Applied Research , 2013 .

[3]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities , 1999, MIS Q..

[4]  B. Latour.  On actor-network theory : A few clarifications , 1996 .

[5]  M. Callon.  Actor-Network Theory—The Market Test , 1999 .

[6]  Cosmas Gitta,et al.  Getting Connected: Information and Communications Technology for Development. , 2001 .

[7]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Amany R. Elbanna,et al.  From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2001 .

[9]  Pernille Eskerod,et al.  Stakeholder Management Strategies and Practices during a Project Course , 2014 .

[10]  Jeffrey Braithwaite,et al.  Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review , 2013, BMC Health Services Research.

[11]  Toni Robertson,et al.  Identifying stakeholder perspectives in a large collaborative project: an ICT4D case study , 2011, OZCHI.

[12]  N. Smith,et al.  What's at Stake? Stakeholder Engagement Strategy as the Key to Sustainable Growth , 2011 .

[13]  Anandasivakumar Ekambaram,et al.  When Stakeholders Shape Successes or Bring Failures - A Case Study of an Algerian Megaproject , 2015, CENTERIS/ProjMAN/HCist.

[14]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[15]  Subhash Bhatnagar,et al.  Why A Global Exchange for Scaling Up Success Scaling Up Poverty Reduction : A Global Learning Process and Conference Shanghai , May 25 27 , 2004 Online Delivery of Land Titles to Rural Farmers in Karnataka , India , 2004 .

[16]  Sherah Kurnia,et al.  In Search for Holistic ICT4D Research: A Systematic Literature Review , 2018, HICSS.

[17]  Jörg Andriof,et al.  Unfolding Stakeholder Engagement , 2017 .

[18]  J. Hassard,et al.  Actor Network Theory and After , 1999 .

[19]  M. Callon,et al.  Mapping the dynamics of science and technology : sociology of science in the real world , 1988 .

[20]  Laura Maria Ferri,et al.  Stakeholder management: a systematic literature review , 2019, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society.

[21]  Yasmin Merali,et al.  The Broader Context for ICT4D Projects: A Morphogenetic Analysis , 2013, MIS Q..

[22]  Azerbaijan Farm Privatization,et al.  A case study from Reducing Poverty, Sustaining Growth—What Works, What Doesn't, and Why A Global Exchange for Scaling Up Success Scaling Up Poverty Reduction: A Global Learning Process and Conference , 2004 .

[23]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Aziz Sheikh,et al.  Actor-Network Theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare , 2010, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[25]  B. Latour.  Technology is Society Made Durable , 1990 .

[26]  Isabel Ortiz-Marcos,et al.  What Is Going on with Stakeholder Theory in Project Management Literature? A Symbiotic Relationship for Sustainability , 2018 .

[27]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Qualitative Research from Start to Finish , 2010 .

[28]  S. Revi Sterling,et al.  Considering failure: eight years of ITID research , 2012, ICTD.

[29]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Analyzing conflict and its management within ICT4D partnerships: an institutional logics perspective , 2018, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[30]  J. Kujala,et al.  Towards an improved understanding of project stakeholder landscapes , 2016 .

[31]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Blogging for ICT4D: reflecting and engaging with peers to build development discourse , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[32]  Léa Velho,et al.  Let's follow the actors! Does Actor-Network Theory have anything to contribute to science journalism? , 2010 .

[33]  Paul De Lange,et al.  Understanding the application of Actor-Network Theory in the process of accounting change , 2014 .

[34]  Pradip Thomas,et al.  Bhoomi, Gyan Ganga, e-governance and the right to information: ICTs and development in India , 2009, Telematics Informatics.

[35]  G. Bowker,et al.  Out of machine age?: complexity, sociotechnical systems and actor network theory , 2001 .

[36]  Claire J. Glendenning,et al.  The relevance of content in ICT initiatives in Indian agriculture , 2012 .

[37]  Eswaran Subrahmanian,et al.  Information and Communications Technology for Development (ICT4D) - A Design Challenge? , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development.

[38]  Ricardo Bezerra Cavalcante,et al.  THE ACTOR-NETWORK THEORY AS A THEORETICAL-METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK IN HEALTH AND NURSING RESEARCH , 2017 .

[39]  Ari Paloviita,et al.  Actor‐networking stakeholder theory for today's corporate communications , 2010 .

[40]  Janita F. J. Vos,et al.  An integrative framework for managing project issues across stakeholder groups , 2015 .

[41]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[42]  Shamim Bodhanya,et al.  Exploring stakeholder interactions through the lens of complexity theory: lessons from the sugar industry , 2015 .

[43]  G. Walsham.  Actor-network theory and IS research: current status and future prospects , 1997 .

[44]  B. Latour.  On Actor-Network Theory. A Few Clarifications, Plus More Than a Few Complications , 2017 .