CRISPR/Cas9 targeting events cause complex deletions and insertions at 17 sites in the mouse genome

Although CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing has provided numerous opportunities to interrogate the functional significance of any given genomic site, there is a paucity of data on the extent of molecular scars inflicted on the mouse genome. Here we interrogate the molecular consequences of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletions at 17 sites in four loci of the mouse genome. We sequence targeted sites in 632 founder mice and analyse 54 established lines. While the median deletion size using single sgRNAs is 9 bp, we also obtain large deletions of up to 600 bp. Furthermore, we show unreported asymmetric deletions and large insertions of middle repetitive sequences. Simultaneous targeting of distant loci results in the removal of the intervening sequences. Reliable deletion of juxtaposed sites is only achieved through two-step targeting. Our findings also demonstrate that an extended analysis of F1 genotypes is required to obtain conclusive information on the exact molecular consequences of targeting events.

[1]  S. Honma,et al.  Disruption of MeCP2 attenuates circadian rhythm in CRISPR/Cas9‐based Rett syndrome model mouse , 2015, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[2]  Melissa M. Harrison,et al.  Genome Engineering of Drosophila with the CRISPR RNA-Guided Cas9 Nuclease , 2013, Genetics.

[3]  Jennifer Doudna,et al.  RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells , 2013, eLife.

[4]  Yoshitaka Fujihara,et al.  Feasibility for a large scale mouse mutagenesis by injecting CRISPR/Cas plasmid into zygotes , 2014, Development, growth & differentiation.

[5]  G. Matlashewski,et al.  CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Leishmania donovani , 2015, mBio.

[6]  Lluis Montoliu,et al.  Functional validation of mouse tyrosinase non-coding regulatory DNA elements by CRISPR–Cas9-mediated mutagenesis , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  Haig Keshishian,et al.  Making the right connections , 1993, Nature.

[8]  Ya Guo,et al.  Efficient inversions and duplications of mammalian regulatory DNA elements and gene clusters by CRISPR/Cas9 , 2015, Journal of molecular cell biology.

[9]  S. Takada,et al.  Microinjection-based generation of mutant mice with a double mutation and a 0.5 Mb deletion in their genome by the CRISPR/Cas9 system , 2016, The Journal of reproduction and development.

[10]  Eugenia G. Giannopoulou,et al.  NFIB is a governor of epithelial–melanocyte stem cell behaviour in a shared niche , 2013, Nature.

[11]  Mingyao Liu,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated somatic correction of a novel coagulator factor IX gene mutation ameliorates hemophilia in mouse , 2016, EMBO molecular medicine.

[12]  H. Kiyonari,et al.  A possible aid in targeted insertion of large DNA elements by CRISPR/Cas in mouse zygotes , 2016, Genesis.

[13]  R. Elkon,et al.  Functional genetic screens for enhancer elements in the human genome using CRISPR-Cas9 , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  Qin Ma,et al.  Deciphering relationship between microhomology and in-frame mutation occurrence in human CRISPR-based gene knockout , 2016, Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids.

[15]  L. Hennighausen,et al.  An autoregulatory enhancer controls mammary-specific STAT5 functions , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  Ankit Malhotra,et al.  Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Mice by Zygote Electroporation of Nuclease , 2015, Genetics.

[17]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  One-Step Generation of Mice Carrying Mutations in Multiple Genes by CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Genome Engineering , 2013, Cell.

[18]  L. Hennighausen,et al.  Lineage-Specific and Non-specific Cytokine-Sensing Genes Respond Differentially to the Master Regulator STAT5. , 2016, Cell reports.

[19]  Sangsu Bae,et al.  Microhomology-based choice of Cas9 nuclease target sites , 2014, Nature Methods.

[20]  Yong-Hua Sun,et al.  Efficient ligase 3-dependent microhomology-mediated end joining repair of DNA double-strand breaks in zebrafish embryos. , 2015, Mutation research.

[21]  A. E. Sippel,et al.  Nuclear factor I-B (Nfib) deficient mice have severe lung hypoplasia , 2002, Mechanisms of Development.

[22]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  One-Step Generation of Mice Carrying Reporter and Conditional Alleles by CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Genome Engineering , 2013, Cell.

[23]  Ruirui Jia,et al.  Large Genomic Fragment Deletions and Insertions in Mouse Using CRISPR/Cas9 , 2015, PloS one.

[24]  Y. Kikkawa,et al.  Heterozygous mutation of Ush1g/Sans in mice causes early-onset progressive hearing loss, which is recovered by reconstituting the strain-specific mutation in Cdh23. , 2016, Human molecular genetics.

[25]  A. Cheng,et al.  CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing of a Single Regulatory Element Nearly Abolishes Target Gene Expression in Mice—Brief Report , 2015, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[26]  Bing Ren,et al.  CRISPR Reveals a Distal Super-Enhancer Required for Sox2 Expression in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells , 2014, PloS one.

[27]  D. Gauguier,et al.  Homology-directed repair in rodent zygotes using Cas9 and TALEN engineered proteins , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[28]  D. Horn,et al.  Exome sequencing and CRISPR/Cas genome editing identify mutations of ZAK as a cause of limb defects in humans and mice , 2016, Genome research.

[29]  David R. Liu,et al.  CRISPR-Based Technologies for the Manipulation of Eukaryotic Genomes , 2017, Cell.

[30]  S. P. Kurup,et al.  CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Single-Gene and Gene Family Disruption in Trypanosoma cruzi , 2014, mBio.

[31]  Konstantin Severinov,et al.  Interference by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) RNA is governed by a seed sequence , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  S. Wolfe,et al.  Creating and evaluating accurate CRISPR-Cas9 scalpels for genomic surgery , 2015, Nature Methods.

[33]  S. Ha,et al.  Highly efficient gene knockout in mice and zebrafish with RNA-guided endonucleases , 2014, Genome research.

[34]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells , 1987, Cell.

[35]  P. Zamore,et al.  Rapid Screening for CRISPR-Directed Editing of the Drosophila Genome Using white Coconversion , 2016, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[36]  J. Duan,et al.  Ligase I and ligase III mediate the DNA double-strand break ligation in alternative end-joining , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  L. Hennighausen,et al.  Differential cytokine sensitivities of STAT5-dependent enhancers rely on Stat5 autoregulation , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[38]  Le Cong,et al.  Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems , 2013, Science.

[39]  Xin Zhou,et al.  Zinc finger nuclease: a new approach for excising HIV-1 proviral DNA from infected human T cells , 2014, Molecular Biology Reports.

[40]  Koji Sugiura,et al.  Efficient generation of large-scale genome-modified mice using gRNA and CAS9 endonuclease , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  J. Doudna,et al.  A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity , 2012, Science.

[42]  L. Notarangelo,et al.  Rapid generation of novel models of RAG1 deficiency by CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutagenesis in murine zygotes , 2016, Oncotarget.

[43]  L. Zon,et al.  Dynamic Control of Enhancer Repertoires Drives Lineage and Stage-Specific Transcription during Hematopoiesis. , 2016, Developmental cell.

[44]  L. Hennighausen,et al.  Coregulation of genetic programs by the transcription factors NFIB and STAT5. , 2014, Molecular endocrinology.

[45]  Rodolfo Ghirlando,et al.  CTCF: making the right connections , 2016, Genes & development.

[46]  L. Hennighausen,et al.  Hierarchy within the mammary STAT5-driven Wap super-enhancer , 2016, Nature Genetics.

[47]  A. Tomkinson,et al.  Chromosomal translocations in human cells are generated by canonical nonhomologous end-joining. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[48]  Eric S Lander,et al.  The Heroes of CRISPR , 2016, Cell.

[49]  P. Kwok,et al.  Endothelin signaling activates Mef2c expression in the neural crest through a MEF2C-dependent positive-feedback transcriptional pathway , 2015, Development.

[50]  A. Tajima,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene knockout in the mouse brain using in utero electroporation , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[51]  F. Frischknecht,et al.  Zinc finger nuclease-based double-strand breaks attenuate malaria parasites and reveal rare microhomology-mediated end joining , 2015, Genome Biology.

[52]  James E. DiCarlo,et al.  RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9 , 2013, Science.

[53]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Generation of gene-modified mice via Cas9/RNA-mediated gene targeting , 2013, Cell Research.

[54]  G. Presicce,et al.  Efficient generation of FVII gene knockout mice using CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease and truncated guided RNAs , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[55]  Y. Arai,et al.  Validation of microinjection methods for generating knockout mice by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[56]  Min Zhang,et al.  Somatic mosaicism and allele complexity induced by CRISPR/Cas9 RNA injections in mouse zygotes. , 2014, Developmental biology.

[57]  Hidde L Ploegh,et al.  Inhibition of non-homologous end joining increases the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated precise [TM: inserted] genome editing , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[58]  K. Nakano,et al.  Functional validation of tensin2 SH2-PTB domain by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing , 2016, The Journal of veterinary medical science.

[59]  M. McVey,et al.  MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director's cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings. , 2008, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[60]  Fengtang Yang,et al.  Chromosome engineering in zygotes with CRISPR/Cas9 , 2016, Genesis.

[61]  Jiankui Zhou,et al.  Dual sgRNAs facilitate CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated mouse genome targeting , 2014, The FEBS journal.

[62]  Liang Li,et al.  Large genomic fragment deletion and functional gene cassette knock-in via Cas9 protein mediated genome editing in one-cell rodent embryos , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[63]  M. Ikawa,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Rapid Generation of Multiple Mouse Lines Identified Ccdc63 as Essential for Spermiogenesis , 2015, International journal of molecular sciences.

[64]  Bin Li,et al.  A new class of temporarily phenotypic enhancers identified by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genetic screening , 2016, Genome research.