What can open innovation be used for and how does it create value?

Abstract Societies face difficult challenges which require responses that go beyond the innovation capability of most public sector organisations. Open approaches to public sector innovation that exploits digital technologies have been proposed for some years to close this gap, but our knowledge of the use and outcome of using open innovation in this context is limited. This research takes stock of the study and use of these approaches by investigating the purposes for which public sector organisations use open innovation, and how it creates value. The research question is answered through a systematic literature review and an analysis of publicly available data about the open innovation projects referred to in that literature. The research identifies five different purposes of using open innovation. It also suggests that public sector organisations primarily use open innovation to pursue one specific purpose: innovation in society. When using open innovation for this purpose, public sector organisations attempt to create value by improving citizens' quality of life and the quality of neighbourhoods. They do this primarily by co-specialising IT and other resources in society (e.g. the transportation system) and by using the outcome of this co-specialisation process to change citizen behaviour, capabilities and experiences (e.g. encouraging citizens to use the transportation system more efficiently or making citizens feel more safe when using the transportation system). This research indicates that open innovation is generally not used to open up public sector organisations or to give citizens more influence in public sector or democratic processes. The research also indicates that open innovation, until now, has primarily been used to solve minor problems, and not large scale wicked problems in society. The research suggests a framework for value creation from open innovation initiatives that pursues innovation in society. This framework might help public sector organisations increase value creation and solve wicked problems using open innovation, and might help researchers to focus future open innovation research on essential knowledge gaps.

[1]  A. Majchrzak,et al.  Open Innovation Requires Integrated Competition-Community Ecosystems: Lessons Learned from Civic Open Innovation , 2014 .

[2]  B. Wirtz,et al.  E-participation: A Strategic Framework , 2018 .

[3]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Promoting open innovation in the public sector through social media monitoring , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  Tianyi Ma,et al.  CITY FEED , 2016, ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol..

[5]  Luis F. Luna-Reyes,et al.  Opening the black box: Developing strategies to use social media in government , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[6]  Jukka Ojasalo,et al.  Collaborative Innovation with External Actors : An Empirical Study on Open Innovation Platforms in Smart Cities , 2016 .

[7]  Diego López-de-Ipiña,et al.  Citizen-centric data services for smarter cities , 2017, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[8]  Sauro Vicini,et al.  The City of the Future Living Lab , 2012 .

[9]  Taewoo Nam,et al.  Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0 , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[10]  Suvi Konsti-Laakso,et al.  Stolen snow shovels and good ideas: The search for and generation of local knowledge in the social media community , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[11]  Angelo Corallo,et al.  Information and communication technologies and public participation: interactive maps and value added for citizens , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  Mila Gascó,et al.  Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[13]  Sonia Royo,et al.  “Crowdsourcing” as a tool for e-participation: two experiences regarding CO2 emissions at municipal level , 2015, Electronic Commerce Research.

[14]  Jennifer Minner,et al.  Capturing Volunteered Historical Information: Lessons from Development of a Local Government Crowdsourcing Tool , 2015 .

[15]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Managing e‐Government: value positions and relationships , 2015, Inf. Syst. J..

[16]  Jacob Torfing,et al.  Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector , 2011 .

[17]  Ben Bommert,et al.  Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector , 2010 .

[18]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[19]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  A framework for advanced social media exploitation in government for crowdsourcing , 2014 .

[20]  Mary Tate,et al.  Managing the "Fuzzy front end" of open digital service innovation in the public sector: A methodology , 2018, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[21]  Bram Klievink,et al.  Realizing joined-up government - Dynamic capabilities and stage models for transformation , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries , 2012 .

[23]  Dimitri Schuurman,et al.  Innovation in the Public Sector: Exploring the Characteristics and Potential of Living Labs and Innovation Labs , 2017 .

[24]  Asbjørn Følstad,et al.  Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review , 2008 .

[25]  Blake Ives,et al.  Review: IT-Dependent Strategic Initiatives and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature , 2005, MIS Q..

[26]  Christoph Ihl,et al.  Citizensourcing: Applying the Concept of Open Innovation to the Public Sector , 2010 .

[27]  Jason Smith,et al.  The Challenges of Challenge.Gov: Adopting Private Sector Business Innovations in the Federal Government , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[28]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Crowdsourcing civility: A natural experiment examining the effects of distributed moderation in online forums , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[29]  Daren C. Brabham Motivations for Participation in a Crowdsourcing Application to Improve Public Engagement in Transit Planning , 2012 .

[30]  Ines Mergel,et al.  Open innovation in the public sector: drivers and barriers for the adoption of Challenge.gov , 2018, Digital Government and Public Management.

[31]  Ana Escoval,et al.  The open nature of innovation in the hospital sector: The role of external collaboration networks , 2012 .

[32]  K. Desouza,et al.  Implementing Open Innovation in the Public Sector : the Case of Challenge.gov , 2013 .

[33]  E. Seltzer,et al.  Citizen Participation, Open Innovation, and Crowdsourcing , 2013 .

[34]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence , 2003, CSUR.

[35]  Vernon J. Richardson,et al.  Returns on Investments in Information Technology: A Research Synthesis , 2002, J. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Jeffrey R. Davis,et al.  Open Innovation at NASA: A New Business Model for Advancing Human Health and Performance Innovations , 2015 .

[37]  Paulo Henrique de Souza Bermejo,et al.  Open Innovation for Citizen Coproduction , 2015, EGOVIS.

[38]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  Challenges of creating and capturing value in open eco-innovation: Evidence from the maritime industry in Denmark , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[39]  Paul Michael Di Gangi,et al.  Open Innovation Through Online Communities , 2009, Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning.

[40]  Araz Taeihagh,et al.  The Fundamentals of Policy Crowdsourcing , 2015, ArXiv.

[41]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[42]  Keld Pedersen eGovernment in Local Government: Challenges and Capabilities , 2016 .

[43]  Barbora Haltofová USING CROWDSOURCING TO SUPPORT CIVIC ENGAGEMENT IN STRATEGIC URBAN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING: A CASE STUDY OF OSTRAVA, CZECH REPUBLIC , 2018, Journal of Competitiveness.

[44]  Daniel Perez González,et al.  Implementation of Social Media Concepts for e-Government: Case Study of a Social Media Tool for Value Co-Creation and Citizen Participation , 2016, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[45]  Anne L. J. Ter Wal,et al.  Coping with Open Innovation: Responding to the Challenges of External Engagement in R&D , 2014 .

[46]  Martin Lodge,et al.  Crowdsourcing and regulatory reviews: A new way of challenging red tape in British government? , 2015 .

[47]  Anneke Zuiderwijk,et al.  Open innovation in the public sector: A research agenda , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[48]  Diego López-de-Ipiña,et al.  Towards Citizen Co-created Public Service Apps , 2016, UCAmI.

[49]  Krassimira Paskaleva,et al.  Open innovation and the evaluation of internet-enabled public services in smart cities , 2018, Technovation.

[50]  Euripidis N. Loukis,et al.  Citizen-Sourcing for Public Policy Making: Theoretical Foundations, Methods and Evaluation , 2018 .

[51]  Guido Schryen,et al.  Revisiting IS business value research: what we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[52]  M. Moon Evolution of co-production in the information age: crowdsourcing as a model of web-based co-production in Korea , 2018 .

[53]  Julie A. Kientz,et al.  Personality and Persuasive Technology: An Exploratory Study on Health-Promoting Mobile Applications , 2010, PERSUASIVE.

[54]  Daren C. Brabham Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects , 2009 .

[55]  Phillip Brooker,et al.  The value of social media data: Integrating crowd capabilities in evidence-based policy , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[56]  Patrick Finnegan,et al.  Open innovation and public administration: transformational typologies and business model impacts , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes , 2004 .

[58]  Malcolm Long Beyond Traditional Boundaries: Government in the Information Age , 2002 .

[59]  Esteve Almirall,et al.  The role of public open innovation intermediaries in local government and the public sector , 2013, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[60]  Helen K. Liu Crowdsourcing Government: Lessons from Multiple Disciplines , 2017 .

[61]  U. Lichtenthaler,et al.  A Capability-Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity , 2009 .

[62]  Vasiliki Baka,et al.  Co-creating an open platform at the local governance level: How openness is enacted in Zambia , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[63]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  Moving from E-Government to T-Government: A Study of Process Reengineering Challenges in a UK Local Authority Context , 2008, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[64]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Towards an Integrated and Inclusive Platform for Open Innovation in the Public Sector , 2017, e-Democracy.

[65]  Dennis Linders,et al.  From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[66]  Bram Klievink,et al.  Barriers and impediments to transformational government: insights from literature and practice , 2011, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[67]  Nitesh Bharosa,et al.  The collaborative realization of public values and business goals: Governance and infrastructure of public-private information platforms , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[68]  Beat Estermann,et al.  Development paths towards open government - an empirical analysis among heritage institutions , 2018, Gov. Inf. Q..

[69]  Renate E. Meyer,et al.  When Bureaucracy Meets the Crowd: Studying “Open Government” in the Vienna City Administration , 2017 .

[70]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  A foundation for the study of behavior change support systems , 2012, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[71]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[72]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[73]  Xuejiao Zhao,et al.  What factors drive open innovation in China's public sector? A case study of official document exchange via microblogging (ODEM) in Haining , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[74]  Enhancing Early Innovation in an Urban Living Lab : Lessons from Espoo, Finland , 2016 .

[75]  V. Bekkers,et al.  Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda , 2015 .

[76]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Using Public Crowds for Open Strategy Formulation: Mitigating the Risks of Knowledge Gaps , 2017 .

[77]  V. Vimarlund,et al.  Healthcare in the age of open innovation – A literature review , 2016, Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia.

[78]  J. Pánek Participatory Mapping in Community Participation – Case Study of Jeseník, Czech Republic , 2018, Quaestiones Geographicae.

[79]  Keld Pedersen E-government transformations: challenges and strategies , 2018 .

[80]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Going Beyond Bureaucracy Through Gamification: Innovation Labs and Citizen Engagement in the Case of “Mapaton” in Mexico City , 2017 .

[81]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[82]  Glenn A. Bowen Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method , 2009 .

[83]  Alberto Ferraris,et al.  The cities of the future: Hybrid alliances for open innovation projects , 2018, Futures.

[84]  Ines Mergel Opening Government , 2015 .

[85]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Citizen involvement in public sector innovation: Government and citizen perspectives , 2015, Inf. Polity.

[86]  Carina Veeckman,et al.  The City as Living Laboratory: Empowering Citizens with the Citadel Toolkit , 2015 .

[87]  Lisa Schmidthuber,et al.  Unleashing Innovation beyond Organizational Boundaries: Exploring Citizensourcing Projects , 2018 .

[88]  David Konopnicki,et al.  Driving public sector innovation using big and open linked data (BOLD) , 2017, Information Systems Frontiers.

[89]  D. Bartlett Champions of local authority innovation revisited , 2017 .