Modeling elastic wave propagation in kidney stones with application to shock wave lithotripsy.

A time-domain finite-difference solution to the equations of linear elasticity was used to model the propagation of lithotripsy waves in kidney stones. The model was used to determine the loading on the stone (principal stresses and strains and maximum shear stresses and strains) due to the impact of lithotripsy shock waves. The simulations show that the peak loading induced in kidney stones is generated by constructive interference from shear waves launched from the outer edge of the stone with other waves in the stone. Notably the shear wave induced loads were significantly larger than the loads generated by the classic Hopkinson or spall effect. For simulations where the diameter of the focal spot of the lithotripter was smaller than that of the stone the loading decreased by more than 50%. The constructive interference was also sensitive to shock rise time and it was found that the peak tensile stress reduced by 30% as rise time increased from 25 to 150 ns. These results demonstrate that shear waves likely play a critical role in stone comminution and that lithotripters with large focal widths and short rise times should be effective at generating high stresses inside kidney stones.

[1]  L A Crum,et al.  In vivo pressure measurements of lithotripsy shock waves in pigs. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  Qing Huo Liu,et al.  PERFECTLY MATCHED LAYERS FOR ELASTODYNAMICS: A NEW ABSORBING BOUNDARY CONDITION , 1996 .

[3]  B. Sturtevant,et al.  Fracture mechanics model of stone comminution in ESWL and implications for tissue damage. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  G. Bartsch,et al.  New onset hypertension after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: age related incidence and prediction by intrarenal resistive index. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[5]  S. Gracewski,et al.  Finite difference predictions of P-SV wave propagation inside submerged solids. I. Liquid-solid interface conditions. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  R. Cleveland,et al.  Effect of the diameter and the sound speed of a kidney stone on the acoustic field induced by shock waves , 2004 .

[7]  J. Lingeman,et al.  Renal Trauma and the Risk of Long-Term Complications in Shock Wave Lithotripsy , 1997, Nephron.

[8]  P. Zhong,et al.  Dynamic photoelastic study of the transient stress field in solids during shock wave lithotripsy. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  R. Cleveland,et al.  Effect of the diameter and the sound speed of a kidney stone on the acoustic field induced by shock waves , 2002 .

[10]  K. Yee.  Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell's equations in isotropic media , 1966 .

[11]  W Eisenmenger,et al.  The mechanisms of stone fragmentation in ESWL. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  Robert W. Graves,et al.  Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3D elastic media using staggered-grid finite differences , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[13]  B. Kennett,et al.  Seismic Wave Propagation in Stratified Media , 1983 .

[14]  Jean-Pierre Berenger,et al.  A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves , 1994 .

[15]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  Theory of Elasticity (3rd ed.) , 1970 .

[16]  R. Cleveland,et al.  High strain rate testing of kidney stones , 2004, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[17]  Qing Huo Liu,et al.  A three‐dimensional finite difference simulation of sonic logging , 1996 .

[18]  N. Cohen,et al.  Mechanical testing of urinary calculi , 2004, World Journal of Urology.

[19]  J. Virieux.  P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: Velocity‐stress finite‐difference method , 1986 .

[20]  E. Schmiedt,et al.  EXTRACORPOREALLY INDUCED DESTRUCTION OF KIDNEY STONES BY SHOCK WAVES , 1980, The Lancet.

[21]  J. Burns,et al.  Hardness Testing of Urinary Calculi , 1985 .

[22]  Michael R. Bailey,et al.  Ultracal-30 gypsum artificial stones for research on the mechanisms of stone breakage in shock wave lithotripsy , 2005, Urological Research.

[23]  P. Alken,et al.  The clinical introduction of a third generation lithotriptor: Modulith SL 20. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[24]  S. Gracewski,et al.  Finite difference predictions of P-SV wave propagation inside submerged solids. II. Effect of geometry. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  G. Preminger,et al.  Characterization of fracture toughness of renal calculi using a microindentation technique , 1993 .

[26]  David I. Lee,et al.  Current management of urolithiasis: progress or regress? , 2002, Journal of endourology.

[27]  J. M. Alexander,et al.  Advanced mechanics of materials , 1977 .

[28]  C. Church,et al.  A theoretical study of cavitation generated by an extracorporeal shock wave lithotripter. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  K. Pace,et al.  Low success rate of repeat shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones after failed initial treatment. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[30]  R. Cleveland,et al.  Effect of stone motion on in vitro comminution efficiency of Storz Modulith SLX. , 2004, Journal of endourology.