Myodocopa (Crustacea: Ostracoda) as models for evolutionary studies of light and vision: multiple origins of bioluminescence and extreme sexual dimorphism

Evolutionists often use phylogeny to examine independent evolutionary events in search of generality. Therefore, groups of organisms rich in such independent character transitions are particularly valuable for the study of evolution. With respect to eyes, vision, and light-related characters, one such group is Ostracoda (Crustacea). Phylogenies of ostracods, derived from DNA sequence data and morphological characters, are presented. These inferred relationships largely agree with previous assessments of ostracod phylogeny, with the exception of paraphyletic Philomedidae. Based on methods of character reconstruction using these inferred relationships, different groups of ostracods probably evolved both bioluminescence and extreme sexual dimorphism (females lack eyes, males have large eyes) multiple times. Furthermore, myodocopid ostracods may have evolved compound eyes independently of other arthropods. For these and other reasons, it is proposed that the Ostracoda are an exceptionally important group for studying the evolution of vision- and light-related characters.

[1]  K. Söderhäll,et al.  The crayfish plasma clotting protein: a vitellogenin-related protein responsible for clot formation in crustacean blood. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  J. G. Morin,et al.  The cypridinid copulatory limb and a new genus Kornickeria (Ostracoda: Myodocopida) with four new species of bioluminescent ostracods from the Caribbean , 1993 .

[3]  M. Pagel.  The Maximum Likelihood Approach to Reconstructing Ancestral Character States of Discrete Characters on Phylogenies , 1999 .

[4]  N. Schizas,et al.  An efficient DNA extraction method for small metazoans. , 1997, Molecular marine biology and biotechnology.

[5]  D. Hillis,et al.  Ribosomal DNA: Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetic Inference , 1991, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[6]  David Posada,et al.  MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution , 1998, Bioinform..

[7]  D. Schluter,et al.  LIKELIHOOD OF ANCESTOR STATES IN ADAPTIVE RADIATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  S. Nagata,et al.  Cloning and expression of cDNA for the luciferase from the marine ostracod Vargula hilgendorfii. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  David L. Swofford,et al.  Reconstructing ancestral character states under Wagner parsimony , 1987 .

[10]  Nick Goldman,et al.  Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution , 1993, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[11]  P. Herring,et al.  Imidazolopyrazine bioluminescence in copepods and other marine organisms , 1990 .

[12]  A. Parker.  Discovery of functional iridescence and its coevolution with eyes in the phylogeny of Ostracoda (Crustacea) , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  L. S. Kornicker.  Antarctic Ostracoda (Myodocopina) , 1975 .

[14]  Terry W. Snell,et al.  Reconstructing ancestral character states: a critical reappraisal , 1998 .

[15]  J. Hailman.  Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History, Stephen Jay Gould. W. W. Norton, New York (1989), 347, Price $19.95 (U.S.A.), $27.95 (Canada) , 1991 .

[16]  M. Baker,et al.  Invertebrate vitellogenin is homologous to human von Willebrand factor. , 1988, The Biochemical journal.

[17]  I. G. Sohn,et al.  Phylogeny, ontogeny & morphology of living and fossil Thaumatocypridacea (Myodocopa: Ostracoda) , 1976 .

[18]  Rainer Fuchs,et al.  CLUSTAL V: improved software for multiple sequence alignment , 1992, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[19]  B. Rannala,et al.  Phylogenetic methods come of age: testing hypotheses in an evolutionary context. , 1997, Science.

[20]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  A Likelihood Ratio Test to Detect Conflicting Phylogenetic Signal , 1996 .

[21]  Michael P. Cummings,et al.  PAUP* [Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods)] , 2004 .

[22]  L. S. Kornicker.  Antarctic Ostracoda (Myodocopina) Parts 1 and 2 , 1975 .

[23]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  Phylogeny of salmonine fishes based on growth hormone introns: Atlantic (Salmo) and Pacific (Oncorhynchus) salmon are not sister taxa. , 1999, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[24]  Wayne P. Maddison,et al.  Macclade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution/Version 3 , 1992 .

[25]  G. Fryer.  Reflections on arthropod evolution , 1996 .

[26]  Louis S. Kornicker,et al.  Myodocopid Ostracoda of Pillar Point Harbor, Half Moon Bay, California , 1997 .

[27]  D. Schluter,et al.  RECONSTRUCTING ANCESTOR STATES WITH MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD : SUPPORT FOR ONE- AND TWO-RATE MODELS , 1999 .

[28]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  Molecular phylogenetic evidence for the independent evolutionary origin of an arthropod compound eye , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  H. Toh,et al.  MOLECULAR EVOLUTION OF THE Ca2+‐BINDING PHOTOPROTEINS OF THE HYDROZOA , 1995, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[30]  D. Labie,et al.  Molecular Evolution , 1991, Nature.

[31]  M. Pagel.  Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  R. Hill,et al.  The Structure and Assembly of Secreted Mucins* 210 , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  T. Spears,et al.  Crustacean phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA , 1998 .

[34]  L. S. Kornicker.  Myodocopid Ostracoda of the BenthIdi Expedition, 1977, to the NE Mozambique Channel, Indian Ocean , 1992 .

[35]  M. Pagel,et al.  The comparative method in evolutionary biology , 1991 .