Active Tuberculosis Is Characterized by Highly Differentiated Effector Memory Th1 Cells

Despite advances in diagnosing latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (LTBI), we still lack a diagnostic test that differentiates LTBI from active tuberculosis (TB) or predicts the risk of progression to active disease. One reason for the absence of such a test may be the failure of current assays to capture the dynamic complexities of the immune responses associated with various stages of TB, since these assays measure only a single parameter (release of IFN-γ) and rely on prolonged (overnight) T cell stimulation. We describe a novel, semi-automated RNA flow cytometry assay to determine whether immunological differences can be identified between LTBI and active TB. We analyzed antigen-induced expression of Th1 cytokine mRNA after short (2- and 6-h) stimulation with antigen, in the context of memory T cell immunophenotyping. IFNG and TNFA mRNA induction was detectable in CD4+ T cells after only 2 h of ex vivo stimulation. Moreover, IFNG- and TNFA-expressing CD4+ T cells (Th1 cells) were more frequent in active TB than in LTBI, a difference that is undetectable with conventional, protein-based cytokine assays. We also found that active TB was associated with higher ratios of effector memory to central memory Th1 cells than LTBI. This effector memory phenotype of active TB was associated with increased T cell differentiation, as defined by loss of the CD27 marker, but not with T cell exhaustion, as determined by PD-1 abundance. These results indicate that single-cell-based, mRNA measurements may help identify time-dependent, quantitative differences in T cell functional status between latent infection and active tuberculosis.

[1]  A. Sharpe,et al.  The diverse functions of the PD1 inhibitory pathway , 2017, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[2]  M. Delgado-Rodríguez,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Medicina intensiva.

[3]  T. Scriba,et al.  Polyfunctional CD4+ T Cells As Targets for Tuberculosis Vaccination , 2017, Front. Immunol..

[4]  Gavin Churchyard,et al.  What We Know About Tuberculosis Transmission: An Overview , 2017, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[5]  R. Wilkinson,et al.  Analysis of the Phenotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Specific CD4+ T Cells to Discriminate Latent from Active Tuberculosis in HIV-Uninfected and HIV-Infected Individuals , 2017, Front. Immunol..

[6]  Courtney R. Plumlee,et al.  Antigen Availability Shapes T Cell Differentiation and Function during Tuberculosis. , 2017, Cell host & microbe.

[7]  Sanjay Tyagi,et al.  FISH-Flow, a protocol for the concurrent detection of mRNA and protein in single cells using fluorescence in situ hybridization and flow cytometry , 2017, Nature Protocols.

[8]  A. Lalvani,et al.  Stratification of Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection by Cellular Immune Profiling , 2017, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[9]  B. Nicolet,et al.  Combined Single-Cell Measurement of Cytokine mRNA and Protein Identifies T Cells with Persistent Effector Function , 2017, The Journal of Immunology.

[10]  D. Goletti,et al.  Use of several immunological markers to model the probability of active tuberculosis. , 2016, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[11]  Bjoern Peters,et al.  A Quantitative Analysis of Complexity of Human Pathogen-Specific CD4 T Cell Responses in Healthy M. tuberculosis Infected South Africans , 2016, PLoS pathogens.

[12]  Delia Goletti,et al.  Tuberculosis Biomarkers: From Diagnosis to Protection , 2016, Infectious disease reports.

[13]  Sanjay Tyagi,et al.  Single-Cell Cytokine Gene Expression in Peripheral Blood Cells Correlates with Latent Tuberculosis Status , 2015, PloS one.

[14]  D. Goletti,et al.  Assessment of CD27 expression as a tool for active and latent tuberculosis diagnosis. , 2015, The Journal of infection.

[15]  S. Ray,et al.  Biomarkers on patient T cells diagnose active tuberculosis and monitor treatment response. , 2015, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[16]  V. Vullo,et al.  Multifunctional Analysis of CD4+ T-Cell Response as Immune-Based Model for Tuberculosis Detection , 2015, Journal of immunology research.

[17]  Y. Ryu Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: Recent Advances and Diagnostic Algorithms , 2015, Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases.

[18]  Sanjay Tyagi,et al.  Profiling T Cell Activation Using Single-Molecule Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Flow Cytometry , 2015, The Journal of Immunology.

[19]  P. Hutchinson,et al.  Measurement of Phenotype and Absolute Number of Circulating Heparin-Binding Hemagglutinin, ESAT-6 and CFP-10, and Purified Protein Derivative Antigen-Specific CD4 T Cells Can Discriminate Active from Latent Tuberculosis Infection , 2014, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.

[20]  A. Antinori,et al.  Polyfunctional T-cells and effector memory phenotype are associated with active TB in HIV-infected patients. , 2014, The Journal of infection.

[21]  Daniel E. Kaufmann,et al.  High throughput detection of miRNAs and gene-specific mRNA at the single-cell level by flow cytometry , 2014, Nature Communications.

[22]  Michael Hoelscher,et al.  Assessment of the novel T-cell activation marker-tuberculosis assay for diagnosis of active tuberculosis in children: a prospective proof-of-concept study. , 2014, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[23]  F. Keyser,et al.  Tuberculin skin test versus interferon-gamma release assays for the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection. , 2014 .

[24]  Bjoern Peters,et al.  Transcriptional Profile of Tuberculosis Antigen–Specific T Cells Reveals Novel Multifunctional Features , 2014, The Journal of Immunology.

[25]  M. Pai,et al.  Gamma Interferon Release Assays for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection , 2014, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[26]  A. Larbi,et al.  From “truly naïve” to “exhausted senescent” T cells: When markers predict functionality , 2014, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[27]  G. Cooke,et al.  T-Cell Immunophenotyping Distinguishes Active From Latent Tuberculosis , 2013, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[28]  A. Pandey,et al.  Proteomic analysis of purified protein derivative of Mycobacterium tuberculosis , 2013, Clinical Proteomics.

[29]  D. Goletti,et al.  IFNγ/TNFα specific-cells and effector memory phenotype associate with active tuberculosis. , 2013, The Journal of infection.

[30]  Bjoern Peters,et al.  Memory T Cells in Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection Are Directed against Three Antigenic Islands and Largely Contained in a CXCR3+CCR6+ Th1 Subset , 2013, PLoS pathogens.

[31]  W. Hanekom,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Polyfunctional T Cells and Secreted Cytokines Induced by Bacille Calmette-Guérin Immunisation in Children and Adults , 2012, PloS one.

[32]  J. Ernst The immunological life cycle of tuberculosis , 2012, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[33]  S. Kaufmann,et al.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis: success through dormancy. , 2012, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[34]  Douglas A. Lauffenburger,et al.  Polyfunctional responses by human T cells result from sequential release of cytokines , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  M. Gennaro,et al.  Immunodiagnosis of Tuberculosis: a Dynamic View of Biomarker Discovery , 2011, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[36]  Jan Dirks,et al.  Whole-Blood Flow-Cytometric Analysis of Antigen-Specific CD4 T-Cell Cytokine Profiles Distinguishes Active Tuberculosis from Non-Active States , 2011, PloS one.

[37]  G. Pantaleo,et al.  Dominant TNF-α+ Mycobacterium tuberculosis–specific CD4+ T cell responses discriminate between latent infection and active disease , 2011, Nature Medicine.

[38]  K Dheda,et al.  Interferon-&ggr; release assays for the diagnosis of active tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2010, European Respiratory Journal.

[39]  T. Ottenhoff,et al.  Multifunctional CD4+ T cells correlate with active Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection , 2010, European journal of immunology.

[40]  Xinjing Wang,et al.  Reduced CD27 Expression on Antigen-Specific CD4+ T Cells Correlates with Persistent Active Tuberculosis , 2010, Journal of Clinical Immunology.

[41]  J. Flynn,et al.  The spectrum of latent tuberculosis: rethinking the biology and intervention strategies , 2009, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[42]  V. Appay,et al.  Phenotype and function of human T lymphocyte subsets: Consensus and issues , 2008, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[43]  Holden Maecker,et al.  Loss of Receptor on Tuberculin-Reactive T-Cells Marks Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis , 2007, PloS one.

[44]  D. Jarrossay,et al.  Surface phenotype and antigenic specificity of human interleukin 17–producing T helper memory cells , 2007, Nature Immunology.

[45]  Pedro Romero,et al.  Four Functionally Distinct Populations of Human Effector-Memory CD8+ T Lymphocytes1 , 2007, The Journal of Immunology.

[46]  Alan D. Roberts,et al.  Differential contributions of central and effector memory T cells to recall responses , 2005, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[47]  Malin Lindstedt,et al.  CD27− CD4+ memory T cells define a differentiated memory population at both the functional and transcriptional levels , 2004, Immunology.

[48]  B. Maes,et al.  A prospective proof of concept study of the efficacy of tacrolimus ointment on uraemic pruritus (UP) in patients on chronic dialysis therapy. , 2004, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[49]  Antonio Lanzavecchia,et al.  Central memory and effector memory T cell subsets: function, generation, and maintenance. , 2004, Annual review of immunology.

[50]  F. Sallusto,et al.  Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions , 1999, Nature.

[51]  C. Mackay,et al.  Flexible Programs of Chemokine Receptor Expression on Human Polarized T Helper 1 and 2 Lymphocytes , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[52]  P. Simms,et al.  Utility of flow cytometric detection of CD69 expression as a rapid method for determining poly- and oligoclonal lymphocyte activation , 1996, Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology.

[53]  M. Pai,et al.  Predictive value of interferon-γ release assays for incident active tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[54]  Microbiology Spectrum , 2022 .