An agent-based model for the investigation of neovascularization within porous scaffolds.

The ability to control blood vessel assembly in polymer scaffolds is important for clinical success in tissue engineering. A mathematical and computational representation of the relationship between scaffold properties and neovascularization may provide a better understanding of the fundamental process itself and help guide the design of new therapeutic approaches. This article proposes a multilayered, multiagent framework to model sprouting angiogenesis in porous scaffolds and examines the impact of pore structure on vessel invasion and network structure. We have defined the speed of vessel sprouting in the agent-based model based on in vivo results in the absence of a polymer scaffold. A number of cases were run to investigate the effect of scaffold pore size on angiogenesis. The simulation results indicate that the rate of scaffold vascularization increases with pore size. Pores of larger size (160-270 μm) support rapid and extensive angiogenesis throughout the scaffold. Model predictions were compared to experimental results of vascularization in porous poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels to validate the results. This model can be used to provide insight into optimal scaffold properties that support vascularization of engineered tissues.

[1]  J. Folkman,et al.  Migration and proliferation of endothelial cells in preformed and newly formed blood vessels during tumor angiogenesis. , 1977, Microvascular research.

[2]  S. McDougall,et al.  Mathematical modeling of tumor-induced angiogenesis. , 2006, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[3]  J. Vacanti,et al.  Tissue engineering. , 1993, Science.

[4]  Sara Checa,et al.  Simulation of angiogenesis and cell differentiation in a CaP scaffold subjected to compressive strains using a lattice modeling approach. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[5]  Holger Gerhardt,et al.  Agent-based simulation of notch-mediated tip cell selection in angiogenic sprout initialisation. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  W. Risau,et al.  Mechanisms of angiogenesis , 1997, Nature.

[7]  Katherine E. Talcott,et al.  The Role of Therapeutic Angiogenesis in Tissue Repair and Regeneration , 2005, Advances in skin & wound care.

[8]  K. Alitalo,et al.  Molecular regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[9]  R K Jain,et al.  Dynamics of neovascularization in normal tissue. , 1981, Microvascular research.

[10]  Nils J. Nilsson,et al.  A Formal Basis for the Heuristic Determination of Minimum Cost Paths , 1968, IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern..

[11]  D. Kohane,et al.  Engineering vascularized skeletal muscle tissue , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  B. Sleeman,et al.  Mathematical modeling of capillary formation and development in tumor angiogenesis: Penetration into the stroma , 2001, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[13]  Jeroen Rouwkema,et al.  Vascularization in tissue engineering. , 2008, Trends in biotechnology.

[14]  M. Chaplain,et al.  Mathematical Modelling of Angiogenesis , 2000, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[15]  Sara Checa,et al.  Effect of cell seeding and mechanical loading on vascularization and tissue formation inside a scaffold: a mechano-biological model using a lattice approach to simulate cell activity. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  E. Brey,et al.  Strategies for Vascularization of Polymer Scaffolds , 2010, Journal of Investigative Medicine.

[17]  C. Patrick,et al.  Three-Dimensional, Quantitative Analysis of Desmin and Smooth Muscle Alpha Actin Expression During Angiogenesis , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  E. Brey,et al.  Endothelial Cell–Matrix Interactions in Neovascularization , 2008 .

[19]  Martin Ehrbar,et al.  Cell‐demanded release of VEGF from synthetic, biointeractive cell‐ingrowth matrices for vascularized tissue growth , 2003, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[20]  P. Maini,et al.  A mathematical model for the capillary endothelial cell-extracellular matrix interactions in wound-healing angiogenesis. , 1997, IMA journal of mathematics applied in medicine and biology.

[21]  Matthias P Lutolf,et al.  Biomolecular hydrogels formed and degraded via site-specific enzymatic reactions. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[22]  E. Brey,et al.  The effect of FGF-1 loaded alginate microbeads on neovascularization and adipogenesis in a vascular pedicle model of adipose tissue engineering. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[23]  T. Skalak,et al.  The FASEB Journal express article 10.1096/fj.03-0933fje. Published online February 6, 2004. Multicellular simulation predicts microvascular patterning and in silico tissue assembly , 2022 .

[24]  H M Byrne,et al.  A model of wound-healing angiogenesis in soft tissue. , 1996, Mathematical biosciences.

[25]  H. M. Byrne,et al.  Mathematical models for tumour angiogenesis: Numerical simulations and nonlinear wave solutions , 1995 .

[26]  E. Brey,et al.  Generation of porous poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels by salt leaching. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[27]  M. Chaplain,et al.  Two-dimensional models of tumour angiogenesis and anti-angiogenesis strategies. , 1997, IMA journal of mathematics applied in medicine and biology.

[28]  Steven C Bankes,et al.  Agent-based modeling: A revolution? , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Ivan Martin,et al.  Angiogenesis in tissue engineering: breathing life into constructed tissue substitutes. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[30]  R. Langer,et al.  Biomaterials in drug delivery and tissue engineering: one laboratory's experience. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.

[31]  Michael J. Miller,et al.  Periosteum-Guided Prefabrication of Vascularized Bone of Clinical Shape and Volume , 2009, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[32]  Michael J. North,et al.  Experiences creating three implementations of the repast agent modeling toolkit , 2006, TOMC.

[33]  R. Auerbach,et al.  Tumor-induced neovascularization in the mouse eye. , 1982, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[34]  H. Levine,et al.  Angiogenesis-A Biochemical/Mathematical Perspective , 2006 .

[35]  D. Balding,et al.  A mathematical model of tumour-induced capillary growth. , 1985, Journal of theoretical biology.

[36]  E. Brey,et al.  Formation of Microchannels in Poly(ethylene glycol) Hydrogels by Selective Degradation of Patterned Microstructures , 2009 .

[37]  Jeff W Lichtman,et al.  Functional muscle regeneration with combined delivery of angiogenesis and myogenesis factors , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Aleksander S. Popel,et al.  Elongation, proliferation & migration differentiate endothelial cell phenotypes and determine capillary sprouting , 2009, BMC Systems Biology.

[39]  M. Chaplain,et al.  Continuous and Discrete Mathematical Models of Tumor‐Induced Angiogenesis , 1999 .

[40]  Huipin Yuan,et al.  Impact of pore size on the vascularization and osseointegration of ceramic bone substitutes in vivo. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.