Wireless Sensor Networks and Beyond: A Case Study on Transport and Logistics

Wireless Sensor Networks provide opportunities even outside their usual application domain of environmental monitoring. In this paper we present a case study on the use of Wireless Sensor Networks for the control and management of transport and logistics processes. In this study nodes will track all activities, and check for errors that might occur in the process of handling and distributing goods. The nodes will be programmed to warn when errors occur, and keep an activity record of the entire process. An overview of the current situation, and the errors that occur therein, is given. A system architecture is described that can solve or reduce the current problems by incorporating a Wireless Sensor Network in the process.

[1]  B. R. Badrinath,et al.  Position and orientation in ad hoc networks , 2004, Ad Hoc Networks.

[2]  Frank Siegemund Cooperating Smart Everyday Objects: Exploiting Heterogeneity and Pervasiveness in Smart Environments , 2005 .

[3]  Paul J.M. Havinga,et al.  A Lightweight Medium Access Protocol (LMAC) for Wireless Sensor Networks: Reducing Preamble Transmissions and Transceiver State Switches , 2004 .

[4]  Matt Welsh,et al.  Programming Sensor Networks Using Abstract Regions , 2004, NSDI.

[5]  Andy Hopper,et al.  The active badge location system , 1992, TOIS.

[6]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Mediacups: experience with design and use of computer-augmented everyday artefacts , 2001, Comput. Networks.

[7]  JAMAL N. AL-KARAKI,et al.  Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: a survey , 2004, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[8]  David Evans,et al.  Localization for mobile sensor networks , 2004, MobiCom '04.

[9]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[10]  Kay Römer The Lighthouse Location System for Smart Dust , 2003, MobiSys '03.

[11]  Bernt Schiele,et al.  Smart-Its Friends: A Technique for Users to Easily Establish Connections between Smart Artefacts , 2001, UbiComp.

[12]  Koen Langendoen,et al.  Distributed localization in wireless sensor networks: a quantitative compariso , 2003, Comput. Networks.

[13]  Paul J.M. Havinga,et al.  Collaborative algorithms for communication in wireless sensor networks , 2003 .

[14]  Samuel Madden,et al.  TinyDB: In-Network Query Processing in TinyOS , 2002 .

[15]  Hari Balakrishnan,et al.  6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on on Mobile Computing and Networking (ACM MOBICOM ’00) The Cricket Location-Support System , 2022 .

[16]  Philip Levis,et al.  Maté: a tiny virtual machine for sensor networks , 2002, ASPLOS X.

[17]  A. Harter,et al.  A distributed location system for the active office , 1994, IEEE Network.

[18]  David E. Culler,et al.  Hood: a neighborhood abstraction for sensor networks , 2004, MobiSys '04.

[19]  B. R. Badrinath,et al.  Error characteristics of ad hoc positioning systems (aps) , 2004, MobiHoc '04.

[20]  Dragos Niculescu,et al.  Positioning in ad hoc sensor networks , 2004, IEEE Network.

[21]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Localization from mere connectivity , 2003, MobiHoc '03.

[22]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[23]  Gerd Kortuem,et al.  Cooperative Artefacts: Assessing Real World Situations with Embedded Technology , 2004, UbiComp.

[24]  Paul J. M. Havinga,et al.  A Distributed Precision Based Localization Algorithm for Ad-Hoc Networks , 2004, Pervasive.