While price and brand image have both been found to be determiners of product quality perception, the potency of these two cues has never been directly compared. Moreover, those studies which found price to be a determiner of perceived quality manipulated only price information, without permitting actual composition characteristics to vary across brands. A 2X2X2X3 factorial experiment, using 136 adult male beer drinkers, and four test beers, examined the effects of price, composition differences, and brand image cues on the perception of beer quality. Price was found to serve as an indicant of product quality when it was the only cue available but not when embedded in a multicue setting. Brand image had a stronger effect upon quality perception, particularly for brands with strong positive images. In addition, it was found that neither price nor brand name had significant effects on perceived quality except when product composition characteristics were allowed to vary between product samples. Last, in contrast to earlier findings, the data suggest that beer drinkers possess at least some ability to distinguish among different brands of beer on the basis of composition (i.e., taste and aroma) cues alone. As the literature on perceived risk (cf. Cox, 1967) clearly demonstrates, consumer purchase decisions are frequently made under conditions of varying uncertainty regarding the product and its attributes. To reduce such uncertainty, consumers seek and process information regarding the product and generally attempt to form accurate impressions of it. Given that products may be viewed "as an array of cues," the "consumer's task in evaluating a product is to use cues from the array as the basis for making judgments about the product (Cox, 1962, p. 413)." One impression usually of considerable importance to the consumer is the product's (or brand's) quality. Cues relevant to forming impressions of quality include (a) price; (b) product composition characteristics such as taste, aroma, color, style, and size; (c) packaging; (d) brand, manufacturer (i.e., corporate), and store image; (e) advertising; (f) word-ofmouth reports; and (g) past purchase experi
[1]
T. Scitovszky.
Some Consequences of the Habit of Judging Quality by Price
,
1944
.
[2]
H. Leavitt.
A Note on Some Experimental Findings About the Meanings of Price
,
1954
.
[3]
B. J. Winer.
Statistical Principles in Experimental Design
,
1992
.
[4]
M. Orne.
On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications.
,
1962
.
[5]
Kenneth P. Uhl,et al.
Influence of Beer Brand Identification on Taste Perception
,
1964
.
[6]
W. T. Tucker.
The Development of Brand Loyalty
,
1964
.
[7]
D. S. Tull,et al.
A Note on the Relationship of Price and Imputed Quality
,
1964
.
[8]
J. C. Naylor,et al.
Characteristics of the human inference process in complex choice behavior situations
,
1966
.
[9]
James H. Myers,et al.
Consumer behavior and marketing management
,
1967
.
[10]
J. D. Mcconnell.
The Price-Quality Relationship in an Experimental Setting
,
1968
.
[11]
R. Zajonc.
Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.
,
1968
.
[12]
McConnell Jd,et al.
Effect of pricing on perception of product quality.
,
1968
.
[13]
Ben M. Enis,et al.
The Price-Quality Relationship: An Extension
,
1969
.
[14]
D. F. Blankertz,et al.
Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior
,
1969
.