The Age Distribution of Cancer: Implications for Models of Carcinogenesis

1.1. TEN years ago in the introduction to a paper on "Stochastic Models for Carcinogenesis" Armitage and I noted that a variety of models had been put forward, none of which had gained general acceptance, and that no clear body of evidence had been marshalled which would exclude any of them from further consideration (Armitage and Doll, 1961). This was rather discouraging, but it seemed reasonable to maintain an interest in the topic for two reasons. Firstly, many of the concepts on which the models had been based were put forward by research workers on experimental grounds without being formulated in mathematical terms, and it was only sensible to enquire whether these models satisfied the quantitative as well as the qualitative aspects of the data. Secondly, it was possible that the mathematical concepts that were evoked to satisfy the quantitative data might suggest new lines for experimentation. 1.2. In the intervening period, progress has been slow, but the reasons we gave for our interest are still valid and, indeed, have been strengthened. The mechanism by which cancers are produced is still a matter for speculation, but several new possibilities can be considered. Bullough and Lawrence (1960), for example, have obtained evidence of a cybernetic system in which substances are released by cells which act only on cells in the same type of tissue and inhibit their division. In this situation accumulated gene damage might produce a cell that was incapable of reacting to the inhibiting substance (Bullough, 1967). Another possibility was suggested by the discovery that the cells responsible for eliminating foreign proteins might, in some circumstances, react with the body's own cells. Burnet (1967, 1970), therefore, postulates that these immunological reactions fail with increasing age, either because the immunological cells are damaged by mutations or because the total number of divisions, of which they are capable, is limited (Hayflick, 1965). When this happens cellular anomalies, themselves produced by gene mutation, are able to survive and if they have a selective advantage, multiply to produce a cancer. 1.3. During the past ten years many more quantitative data have also become available, relating particularly to the incidence of cancer in man. These data are of two types: cancer registry data recording the incidence of different types of cancer by

[1]  A. Stewart,et al.  Age-distribution of cancers caused by obstetric x-rays and their relevance to cancer latent periods. , 1970, Lancet.

[2]  V. E. Archer,et al.  Lloyd JW, Smith EM, Archer VE, Holaday DA: Mortality of uranium miners in relation to radiation exposure, hard-rock mining and cigarette smoking--1950 through September 1967. , 1969, Health physics.

[3]  R. Doll,et al.  A mathematical model for the age distribution of cancer in man , 1969, International journal of cancer.

[4]  E. C. Hammond,et al.  Asbestos exposure, smoking, and neoplasia. , 1968, JAMA.

[5]  R. Williams THE EVOLUTION OF DIFFERENTIATION , 1968 .

[6]  T. D. Day Carcinogenic action of cigarette smoke condensate on mouse skin. , 1967, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  R. Doll,et al.  Neoplasia in Patients Treated with X-rays for Ankylosing Spondylitis or Metropathia Haemorrhagica , 1967 .

[8]  A. Ciocco,et al.  Radiation-related leukemia in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1946-1964. I. Distribution, incidence and appearance time. , 1966, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  M. Pike,et al.  Effect of Neonatal Thymectomy on the Induction of Papillomata and Carcinomata by 3,4-Benzopyrene in Mice , 1966, Nature.

[10]  Pike Mc,et al.  A method of analysis of a certain class of experiments in carcinogenesis. , 1966 .

[11]  V. Springett The beginning of the end of the increase in mortality from carcinoma of the lung. , 1966, Thorax.

[12]  Kahn Ha The Dorn Study of Smoking and Mortality Among U.S. Veterans: Report on Eight and One-Half Years of Observation , 1966 .

[13]  E. C. Hammond,et al.  Smoking in relation to the death rates of one million men and women. , 1966, National Cancer Institute monograph.

[14]  H. A. Kahn The Dorn study of smoking and mortality among U.S. veterans: report on eight and one-half years of observation. , 1966, National Cancer Institute monograph.

[15]  M. Pike A method of analysis of a certain class of experiments in carcinogenesis. , 1966, Biometrics.

[16]  D. Ashley,et al.  On the incidence of carcinoma of the prostate. , 1965, The Journal of pathology and bacteriology.

[17]  L. Hayflick THE LIMITED IN VITRO LIFETIME OF HUMAN DIPLOID CELL STRAINS. , 1965, Experimental cell research.

[18]  R. Doll,et al.  Mortality in Relation to Smoking: Ten Years' Observations of British Doctors , 1964, British medical journal.

[19]  L. Hayflick,et al.  THE LIMITED IN VITRO LIFETIME OF HUMAN DIPLOID CELL STRAINS 1 , 1964 .

[20]  R. Doll,et al.  Mortality from Primary Tumours of Bone in England and Wales , 1961, British medical journal.

[21]  P. Armitage,et al.  Multistage models of carcinogenesis. , 1985, Environmental health perspectives.

[22]  W. Bullough,et al.  The control of epidermal mitotic activity in the mouse , 1960, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[23]  R. Doll,et al.  Lung Cancer and Other Causes of Death in Relation to Smoking , 1956, British medical journal.

[24]  Dorn Hf The increase in cancer of the lung. , 1954, Industrial medicine & surgery.

[25]  H. Dorn The increase in cancer of the lung. , 1954, Industrial medicine & surgery.

[26]  J. Clemmesen,et al.  Mortality and incidence of cancer of the lung in Denmark and some other countries. , 1953, Acta - Unio Internationalis Contra Cancrum.

[27]  R. Korteweg The Age Curve in Lung Cancer , 1951, British Journal of Cancer.