Debridement Technique and Dead Space Management For Infected Non-Union of the Tibia

Infected non-union of the tibia represents a major challenge to orthopaedic surgeons. Wide resection of infected tissues decreases the recurrence rate of infection in post-osteomyelitis reconstruction. Such radical debridement results in bone and soft tissue defects making the challenge more difficult with creation of a dead space. Elimination of the dead space is a necessity using antibiotic-impregnated cement as a staged technique for further reconstruction of bone and soft tissue. The objective of this series is to assess the efficacy of our integrated protocol for management of infected non-union of the tibia. This prospective study included 23 patients with infected non-union of the tibia with medullary contamination managed by staged debridement and insertion of antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer with later distraction histogenesis using Ilizarov frame for bone and soft tissue reconstruction. The mean age of the patients was 24 years (19 to 52). The mean size of the defect after debridement was 6 cm (range 4–10 cm). The average follow up period was 28 months (range 16–36 months). Successful reconstruction with no recurrence of infection was achieved in all cases (100%) without the need for bone or soft tissue grafts. External fixator index ranged from 35 to 60 days/cm (average 45 days/cm). The functional results were satisfactory in 20 cases (86.9%) and unsatisfactory in 3 cases (13.1%) due to residual leg length discrepancy, joint stiffness, and persistent pain. The proposed staged protocol represents a valid option for successful bone and soft tissue reconstruction and elimination of the infection without the need of bone grafting nor soft tissue procedures.

[1]  E. Rodriguez-Collazo,et al.  A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Flap Selection Following Lower Extremity Free Tissue Transfer Versus Vascularized Perforator Pedicle Flap Transfer in Lower Limb Reconstruction , 2018 .

[2]  D. Tigani,et al.  Orthoplastic surgical collaboration is required to optimise the treatment of severe limb injuries: A multi-centre, prospective cohort study. , 2017, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[3]  M. Hossain,et al.  Induced membrane technique for treating tibial defects gives mixed results , 2017, The bone & joint journal.

[4]  B. El-Alfy Unhappy triad in limb reconstruction: Management by Ilizarov method , 2017, World journal of orthopedics.

[5]  K. Pande Optimal management of chronic osteomyelitis: current perspectives , 2015 .

[6]  L. Marais,et al.  Bone transport through an induced membrane in the management of tibial bone defects resulting from chronic osteomyelitis , 2014, Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction.

[7]  W. Boeckx,et al.  Vascularized fibular transfer in longstanding and infected large bone defects. , 2014, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[8]  C. Aldous,et al.  The management of chronic osteomyelitis: Part II - Principles of post-infective reconstruction and antibiotic therapy , 2014 .

[9]  M. McKee,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing an Antibiotic-Impregnated Bioabsorbable Bone Substitute With Standard Antibiotic-Impregnated Cement Beads in the Treatment of Chronic Osteomyelitis and Infected Nonunion , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[10]  A. Uzel,et al.  Tibial segmental bone defect reconstruction by Ilizarov type bone transport in an induced membrane. , 2010, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[11]  A. Masquelet,et al.  The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects. , 2010, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[12]  C. Zalavras,et al.  Reconstruction of osteomyelitis defects. , 2009, Seminars in plastic surgery.

[13]  Mahmound A El-Rosasy Appraisal of the role of external skeletal fixation in the management of sequelae of open tibial fractures , 2008, Indian journal of orthopaedics.

[14]  P. Allen,et al.  Ilizarov external fixator: acute shortening and lengthening versus bone transport in the management of tibial non-unions. , 2004, Injury.

[15]  Y. Takakura,et al.  Vascularized fibular grafting in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis and infected nonunion. , 2004, Journal of reconstructive microsurgery.

[16]  S. Gitelis,et al.  The Treatment of Chronic Osteomyelitis with a Biodegradable Antibiotic-Impregnated Implant , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic surgery.

[17]  A. Simpson,et al.  Chronic osteomyelitis. The effect of the extent of surgical resection on infection-free survival. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  L. Peltier The Orr Method in Osteomyelitis, Compound Fractures and Other Infections , 1999 .

[19]  S. Kawai,et al.  One‐stage treatment of infected bone defects of the tibia with skin loss by free vascularized osteocutaneous grafts , 1995, Microsurgery.

[20]  J. L. Marsh,et al.  Chronic infected tibial nonunions with bone loss. Conventional techniques versus bone transport. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  G. Cierny,et al.  Segmental tibial defects. Comparing conventional and Ilizarov methodologies. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  hassan a.malkawi,et al.  Active treatment of segmental defects of long bones with established infection. A prospective study. , 1984 .

[23]  A. Simpson,et al.  Chronic osteomyelitis. , 1970, Lancet.