Experiences in urban governance for sustainability: the Constructive Dialogue in Swedish municipalities

The objective of this paper is to analyse the Constructive Dialogue, an initiative for collaborative and integrated urban governance for a sustainable built environment. The dialogue processes, implemented in six Swedish cities in 2004-2009, involved various actors and many types of initiative. Designed as a meta-analysis based on existing evaluations and supplementary interviews, this study examines experiences in capacity building in terms of building relationships, enhancing knowledge, and mobilisation. The study also considers achieved outcome in terms of sustainability, and specifically in terms of environmental aspects. The results show that the collaborative processes to promote relationship building were highly appreciated and that processes of knowledge exchange and knowledge enhancement were seen as quite successful. Consequently, an important result was the enabling of faster processes for urban planning to facilitate the process of urban densification. However, capacity building in terms of mobilisation for a sustainable development was seen to be less successful; the results show that the capacity of the Dialogue to enable mobilisation around sustainability issues through the creation of common visions and goals was weak. The best result was seen in Malmo where the Constructive Dialogue resulted in a shared sustainability agreement which was applied in the development of a new construction site. However, limitations were the difficulties in setting ambitious goals and the lack of knowledge and experience to meet the goals set in the agreement. The study indicates a difficulty in simultaneously considering process and environmental concerns and a tension between consensus and cutting-edge solutions. The study also illustrates the need to further develop processes for urban governance for sustainability. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (Less)

[1]  R. Rhodes Understanding Governance: Ten Years On , 2007 .

[2]  Un-Habitat Cities and Climate Change: Global Report on Human Settlements 2011 , 2011 .

[3]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[4]  C. Jacquier ON RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN INTEGRATED POLICIES FOR SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND URBAN GOVERNANCE , 2005 .

[5]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  The Impact of Collaborative Planning on Governance Capacity , 2003 .

[6]  Alexander Aylett,et al.  Participatory Planning, Justice, and Climate Change in Durban, South Africa , 2010 .

[7]  C. Pateman Participation and democratic theory , 1970 .

[8]  H. Bulkeley Cities and the Governing of Climate Change , 2010 .

[9]  Jean Hillier,et al.  Going round the Back? Complex Networks and Informal Action in Local Planning Processes , 2000 .

[10]  Jon Pierre,et al.  Public-Private Partnerships and Urban Governance: Introduction , 1998 .

[11]  D. Kolb,et al.  Planning in the Face of Power. , 1988 .

[12]  Göran Cars,et al.  Nya villkor för den kommunala planeringen , 2006 .

[13]  C de Magalhaes,et al.  Assessing Institutional Capacity for City Centre Regeneration: Newcastle's Grainger Town , 2002 .

[14]  H. Bulkeley,et al.  Local Government and the Governing of Climate Change in Germany and the UK , 2006 .

[15]  P. Healey The Treatment of Space and Place in the New Strategic Spatial Planning in Europe , 2004 .

[16]  Robin Hambleton,et al.  Globalism and Local Democracy , 2003 .

[17]  Bjorn Malbert Participatory Approaches Sustainable Urban Development: Reflections on Practice Vancouver and Waitakere to in Seattle, , 1998 .

[18]  Meg Holden,et al.  Public Participation and Local Sustainability: Questioning a Common Agenda in Urban Governance , 2011 .

[19]  P. Healey Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies , 1997 .

[20]  James A. Throgmorton,et al.  Planning as Persuasive Storytelling: The Rhetorical Construction of Chicago's Electric Future , 1996 .

[21]  Bent Flyvbjerg,et al.  Рациональность и Власть (Rationality and Power) , 1998 .

[22]  Claudio De Magalhães,et al.  Transforming Governance, Institutionalist Analysis and Institutional Capacity , 2002 .

[23]  Valeria Monno,et al.  Tokenism or Political Activism? Some Reflections on Participatory Planning , 2012 .

[24]  Luuk Boelens,et al.  Self-organization in urban development: towards a new perspective on spatial planning , 2011 .

[25]  J. Innes Planning Theory's Emerging Paradigm: Communicative Action and Interactive Practice , 1995 .

[26]  Merritt Polk,et al.  Institutional Capacity-building in Urban Planning and Policy-making for Sustainable Development: Success or Failure? , 2011 .

[27]  Erik Hysing,et al.  Governing towards sustainability : environmental governance and policy change in Swedish forestry and transport , 2010 .

[28]  Rob Imrie,et al.  How New is the New Local Governance? Lessons from the United Kingdom , 1999 .

[29]  Michael Doyle,et al.  Facilitator's Guide to Participatory Decision-Making , 1998 .

[30]  Sherry R. Amstein “A Ladder of Citizen Participation” , 1969 .

[31]  Frans van Waarden,et al.  ‘Governance’ as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy , 2004 .

[32]  Raphaël Fischler,et al.  Communicative Planning Theory: A Foucauldian Assessment , 2000 .

[33]  R. Rhodes,et al.  The New Governance: Governing without Government , 1996 .

[34]  M. Granberg,et al.  Local Governance and Climate Change: Reflections on the Swedish Experience , 2007 .