Generation of a Synthetic Memory Trace

Adding Artificial Associations In the mammalian cortex, there is significant spontaneous neural activity that is internally generated, rather than arising from sensory inputs, and this activity influences the processing of natural sensory stimuli. What role does this internally generated activity play in forming and accessing new memory representations? Using transgenic mice combined with controlled artificial activation of widely distributed neuronal ensembles associated with specific contexts, Garner et al. (p. 1513; see the Perspective by Morris and Takeuchi) investigated how spontaneous neuronal activity is integrated into a given context representation. Animals underwent fear conditioning in two distinct contexts. When a circuit in one context was artificially activated during fear conditioning in a separate context, a so-called “hybrid” memory was formed. This artificially stimulated network became a necessary component of the memory trace. These results are consistent with the emerging view that internally generated brain activity is not noise, but a coherent representation that can be incorporated into new associations and memories. The brains of transgenic mice incorporate experimentally generated neural activity into a memory trace. We investigated the effect of activating a competing, artificially generated, neural representation on encoding of contextual fear memory in mice. We used a c-fos–based transgenic approach to introduce the hM3Dq DREADD receptor (designer receptor exclusively activated by designer drug) into neurons naturally activated by sensory experience. Neural activity could then be specifically and inducibly increased in the hM3Dq-expressing neurons by an exogenous ligand. When an ensemble of neurons for one context (ctxA) was artificially activated during conditioning in a distinct second context (ctxB), mice formed a hybrid memory representation. Reactivation of the artificially stimulated network within the conditioning context was required for retrieval of the memory, and the memory was specific for the spatial pattern of neurons artificially activated during learning. Similar stimulation impaired recall when not part of the initial conditioning.

[1]  H. Jasper,et al.  Epilepsy and the functional anatomy of the human brain , 1985 .

[2]  H. Gastaut,et al.  Epilepsy and the functional anatomy of the human brain , 1954 .

[3]  R.N.Dej.,et al.  Epilepsy and the Functional Anatomy of the Human Brain , 1954, Neurology.

[4]  R. Doty,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the brain in behavioral context. , 1969, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  AC Tose Cell , 1993, Cell.

[6]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Classical Conditioning With Electrical Stimulation of Cerebellum as Both Conditioned and Unconditioned Stimulus , 1996 .

[7]  Streichenwein Sm,et al.  Am J Psychiatry , 1996 .

[8]  Alcino J. Silva,et al.  The dorsal hippocampus is essential for context discrimination but not for contextual conditioning. , 1998, Behavioral neuroscience.

[9]  R. Romo,et al.  Somatosensory discrimination based on cortical microstimulation , 1998, Nature.

[10]  J. Ashby References and Notes , 1999 .

[11]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.

[12]  Greg D. Gale,et al.  Hippocampus and contextual fear conditioning: Recent controversies and advances , 2001, Hippocampus.

[13]  G. Mckhann,et al.  Mouse strain differences in kainic acid sensitivity, seizure behavior, mortality, and hippocampal pathology , 2003, Neuroscience.

[14]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Spontaneously emerging cortical representations of visual attributes , 2003, Nature.

[15]  M. Mayford,et al.  CBP Histone Acetyltransferase Activity Is a Critical Component of Memory Consolidation , 2004, Neuron.

[16]  M. Weliky,et al.  Small modulation of ongoing cortical dynamics by sensory input during natural vision , 2004, Nature.

[17]  Brendon O. Watson,et al.  Internal Dynamics Determine the Cortical Response to Thalamic Stimulation , 2005, Neuron.

[18]  Mark Mayford,et al.  Localization of a Stable Neural Correlate of Associative Memory , 2007, Science.

[19]  John F. Guzowski,et al.  Neuronal Competition and Selection During Memory Formation , 2006, Science.

[20]  Dorothy Tse,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S5 Tables S1 to S3 Electron Impact (ei) Mass Spectra Chemical Ionization (ci) Mass Spectra References Schemas and Memory Consolidation Research Articles Research Articles Research Articles Research Articles , 2022 .

[21]  K. Svoboda,et al.  Genetic Dissection of Neural Circuits , 2008, Neuron.

[22]  Mark Mayford,et al.  Spine-Type-Specific Recruitment of Newly Synthesized AMPA Receptors with Learning , 2008, Science.

[23]  K. Svoboda,et al.  Sparse optical microstimulation in barrel cortex drives learned behaviour in freely moving mice , 2008, Nature.

[24]  Alcino J. Silva,et al.  CREB regulates excitability and the allocation of memory to subsets of neurons in the amygdala , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Bruno Bontempi,et al.  Selective Erasure of a Fear Memory , 2009, Science.

[26]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Selective suppression of hippocampal ripples impairs spatial memory , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Dario L Ringach,et al.  Spontaneous and driven cortical activity: implications for computation , 2009, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[28]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[29]  M. Nicolelis,et al.  Remote Control of Neuronal Activity in Transgenic Mice Expressing Evolved G Protein-Coupled Receptors , 2009, Neuron.

[30]  廣瀬雄一,et al.  Neuroscience , 2019, Workplace Attachments.

[31]  Dorothy Tse,et al.  Schema-Dependent Gene Activation and Memory Encoding in Neocortex , 2011, Science.

[32]  Dan D. Stettler,et al.  Driving Opposing Behaviors with Ensembles of Piriform Neurons , 2011, Cell.