Living materials with programmable functionalities grown from engineered microbial co-cultures

Biological systems assemble tissues and structures with advanced properties in ways that cannot be achieved by man-made materials. Living materials self-assemble under mild conditions, are autonomously patterned, can self-repair and sense and respond to their environment. Inspired by this, the field of engineered living materials (ELMs) aims to use genetically-engineered organisms to generate novel materials. Bacterial cellulose (BC) is a biological material with impressive physical properties and low cost of production that is an attractive substrate for ELMs. Inspired by how plants build materials from tissues with specialist cells we here developed a system for making novel BC-based ELMs by addition of engineered yeast programmed to add functional traits to a cellulose matrix. This is achieved via a synthetic ‘symbiotic culture of bacteria and yeast’ (Syn-SCOBY) approach that uses a stable co-culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with BC-producing Komagataeibacter rhaeticus bacetria. Our Syn-SCOBY approach allows inoculation of engineered cells into simple growth media, and under mild conditions materials self-assemble with genetically-programmable functional properties in days. We show that co-cultured yeast can be engineered to secrete enzymes into BC, generating autonomously grown catalytic materials and enabling DNA-encoded modification of BC bulk material properties. We further developed a method for incorporating S. cerevisiae within the growing cellulose matrix, creating living materials that can sense chemical and optical inputs. This enabled growth of living sensor materials that can detect and respond to environmental pollutants, as well as living films that grow images based on projected patterns. This novel and robust Syn-SCOBY system empowers the sustainable production of BC-based ELMs.

[1]  Martin G. Nussbaumer,et al.  Bootstrapped Biocatalysis: Biofilm‐Derived Materials as Reversibly Functionalizable Multienzyme Surfaces , 2017, ChemCatChem.

[2]  William C. Deloache,et al.  A Highly Characterized Yeast Toolkit for Modular, Multipart Assembly. , 2015, ACS synthetic biology.

[3]  J. Sohn,et al.  Co-fermentation using Recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Strains Hyper-secreting Different Cellulases for the Production of Cellulosic Bioethanol , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[4]  Tom Ellis,et al.  Engineering control of bacterial cellulose production using a genetic toolkit and a new cellulose-producing strain , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Kyongbum Lee,et al.  Novel In Vivo-Degradable Cellulose-Chitin Copolymer from Metabolically Engineered Gluconacetobacter xylinus , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[6]  Zsofia Botyanszki,et al.  Programmable biofilm-based materials from engineered curli nanofibres , 2014, Nature Communications.

[7]  Robert N Grass,et al.  Incorporation of penicillin-producing fungi into living materials to provide chemically active and antibiotic-releasing surfaces. , 2012, Angewandte Chemie.

[8]  Nele De Belie,et al.  Use of silica gel or polyurethane immobilized bacteria for self-healing concrete , 2012 .

[9]  Robert J Citorik,et al.  Synthesis and patterning of tunable multiscale materials with engineered cells , 2014, Nature materials.

[10]  Keith E. J. Tyo,et al.  Yeast-based biosensors: design and applications. , 2014, FEMS yeast research.

[11]  Jeong-Woo Choi,et al.  Phototactic guidance of a tissue-engineered soft-robotic ray , 2016, Science.

[12]  Heather K. Allen,et al.  Call of the wild: antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments , 2010, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[13]  Peter Q Nguyen,et al.  Scalable Production of Genetically Engineered Nanofibrous Macroscopic Materials via Filtration. , 2017, ACS biomaterials science & engineering.

[14]  Y. Huang,et al.  Recent advances in bacterial cellulose , 2014, Cellulose.

[15]  Jing Wang,et al.  Bacterial cellulose production, properties and applications with different culture methods - A review. , 2019, Carbohydrate polymers.

[16]  L. Bláha,et al.  Yeast Biosensors for Detection of Environmental Pollutants: Current State and Limitations. , 2016, Trends in biotechnology.

[17]  Huimin Zhao,et al.  Recent advances in DNA assembly technologies. , 2014, FEMS yeast research.

[18]  Stephen J. Eichhorn,et al.  An estimation of the Young’s modulus of bacterial cellulose filaments , 2008 .

[19]  Tom Ellis,et al.  Engineering a Model Cell for Rational Tuning of GPCR Signaling , 2018, Cell.

[20]  Sonja Billerbeck,et al.  A modular yeast biosensor for low-cost point-of-care pathogen detection , 2017, Science Advances.

[21]  J. Berrin,et al.  Lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases disrupt the cellulose fibers structure , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[22]  Feng Su,et al.  Novel process for immobilizing an enzyme on a bacterial cellulose membrane through repeated absorption , 2017 .

[23]  D. Kilburn,et al.  The cellulose‐binding domain (CBDCex) of an exoglucanase from Cellulomonas fimi: Production in Escherichia coli and characterization of the polypeptide , 1993, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[24]  Justin D. Vrana,et al.  Benchmarking of Optical Dimerizer Systems , 2014, ACS synthetic biology.

[25]  I. Pichová,et al.  Efficient secretion of three fungal laccases from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their potential for decolorization of textile industry effluent—A comparative study , 2018, Biotechnology progress.

[26]  S. Ding,et al.  Engineering and Comparative Characteristics of Double Carbohydrate Binding Modules as a Strength Additive for Papermaking Applications , 2014 .

[27]  B. Viswanath,et al.  Fungal Laccases and Their Applications in Bioremediation , 2014, Enzyme research.

[28]  Y. Nishi,et al.  The structure and mechanical properties of sheets prepared from bacterial cellulose , 1989 .

[29]  Alicia E. Graham,et al.  Engineered cell‐to‐cell signalling within growing bacterial cellulose pellicles , 2018, Microbial biotechnology.

[30]  Timothy K Lu,et al.  Synthetic Biogenesis of Bacterial Amyloid Nanomaterials with Tunable Inorganic-Organic Interfaces and Electrical Conductivity. , 2017, ACS synthetic biology.

[31]  B. Stoddard,et al.  Editorial: NAR Surveys the Past, Present and Future of Restriction Endonucleases , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[32]  Neel S. Joshi,et al.  Biomimetic engineering of conductive curli protein films , 2018, Nanotechnology.

[33]  J. Nicell,et al.  Enzyme-Catalyzed Oxidation of 17β-Estradiol Using Immobilized Laccase from Trametes versicolor , 2011, Enzyme research.

[34]  Megan N. McClean,et al.  Fast-acting and Nearly Gratuitous Induction of Gene Expression and Protein Depletion in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Graduate Program in Quantitative and Computational Biology, And , 2022 .

[35]  Timothy K. Lu,et al.  Engineering Living Functional Materials , 2015, ACS synthetic biology.

[36]  Matthew R Chapman,et al.  Diversity, biogenesis and function of microbial amyloids. , 2012, Trends in microbiology.

[37]  W. Kulicke,et al.  Effects of Different Drying Processes on the Material Properties of Bacterial Cellulose Membranes , 2006 .

[38]  T. Ellis,et al.  Synthetic gene regulation for independent external induction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pseudohyphal growth phenotype , 2018, Communications Biology.

[39]  Molly K. Gibson,et al.  Shared strategies for β-lactam catabolism in the soil microbiome , 2018, Nature Chemical Biology.

[40]  Timothy K Lu,et al.  Stretchable living materials and devices with hydrogel–elastomer hybrids hosting programmed cells , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  W. Verstraete,et al.  Use of bacteria to repair cracks in concrete , 2010 .

[42]  Yuesuo Yang,et al.  Environmental impact of estrogens on human, animal and plant life: A critical review. , 2017, Environment international.

[43]  Sheng-Chi Wu,et al.  Application of bacterial cellulose pellets in enzyme immobilization , 2008 .

[44]  H. E. Kubitschek,et al.  Buoyant density variation during the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1984, Journal of bacteriology.

[45]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Light‐Controlled, High‐Resolution Patterning of Living Engineered Bacteria Onto Textiles, Ceramics, and Plastic , 2019, Advanced Functional Materials.

[46]  S. Bielecki,et al.  Bacterial NanoCellulose Characterization , 2016 .

[47]  D. Zanuy,et al.  Corrigendum: Biomimetic engineering of conductive curli protein films (2018 Nanotechnology 29 454002) , 2018, Nanotechnology.

[48]  David Botstein,et al.  Synthetic biology tools for programming gene expression without nutritional perturbations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[49]  Neel S. Joshi,et al.  Engineered Living Materials: Prospects and Challenges for Using Biological Systems to Direct the Assembly of Smart Materials , 2018, Advanced materials.

[50]  Neel S. Joshi,et al.  Genetically Programmable Self‐Regenerating Bacterial Hydrogels , 2019, Advanced materials.

[51]  C. Wyman,et al.  Deactivation of Cellulase at the Air-Liquid Interface Is the Main Cause of Incomplete Cellulose Conversion at Low Enzyme Loadings , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[52]  Peter Q Nguyen,et al.  Synthetic biology engineering of biofilms as nanomaterials factories. , 2017, Biochemical Society transactions.

[53]  S. Bielecki,et al.  Structural changes of bacterial nanocellulose pellicles induced by genetic modification of Komagataeibacter hansenii ATCC 23769 , 2019, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[54]  S. Lovas,et al.  β-Estradiol and ethinyl-estradiol contamination in the rivers of the Carpathian Basin , 2016, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[55]  J. Mcauliffe,et al.  Industrial use of immobilized enzymes. , 2013, Chemical Society reviews.

[56]  Kean Hean Ooi,et al.  An Expanded Synthetic Biology Toolkit for Gene Expression Control in Acetobacteraceae. , 2019, ACS synthetic biology.

[57]  Mazhar Ul-Islam,et al.  Overview of bacterial cellulose composites: a multipurpose advanced material. , 2013, Carbohydrate polymers.

[58]  K. Tajima,et al.  In Vivo Curdlan/Cellulose Bionanocomposite Synthesis by Genetically Modified Gluconacetobacter xylinus. , 2015, Biomacromolecules.

[59]  이은석,et al.  액체로켓 엔진 Engineering Model 조립 , 2006 .

[60]  Urartu Ozgur Safak Seker,et al.  Genetically encoded conductive protein nanofibers secreted by engineered cells , 2017 .

[61]  Ton Peijs,et al.  All-cellulose nanocomposites by surface selective dissolution of bacterial cellulose , 2009 .

[62]  M. Sathishkumar,et al.  Biochemical characteristics of tea fungus produced during kombucha fermentation , 2010 .

[63]  M. Zou,et al.  Evaluation of Fungal Laccase Immobilized on Natural Nanostructured Bacterial Cellulose , 2015, Front. Microbiol..

[64]  W. Stark,et al.  Incorporating microorganisms into polymer layers provides bioinspired functional living materials , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[65]  R. Singhal,et al.  Microbial Cellulose: Fermentative Production and Applications , 2009 .

[66]  S. Bielecki,et al.  Medical and Cosmetic Applications of Bacterial NanoCellulose , 2016 .

[67]  Tom Ellis,et al.  Biological Engineered Living Materials: Growing Functional Materials with Genetically Programmable Properties. , 2019, ACS synthetic biology.

[68]  Qi Zhou,et al.  Stronger cellulose microfibril network structure through the expression of cellulose-binding modules in plant primary cell walls , 2019, Cellulose.