Toward a Network-Based Approach to Modeling Epistatic Interactions in Genome-Wide Association Studies

In genome-wide association studies, statistical procedures such as logistic regression or the Cochran--Armitage test for trend can be used for the analysis of genetic variants while taking the underlying genetic model into consideration. Should a researcher was to investigate the role played by the interaction between two or more of these genetic variants (epistasis), it would suffice to add an interaction term, which corresponds to their product, to a logistic regression model. However, we question whether such a model is able to capture the intricacy of the genetic architecture in complex traits. Therefore, this paper proposes a network-based model that allows graph theory to characterize both genetic variants and their interactions in a genome-wide context, including a simulation study that proves its applicability.

[1]  Wentian Li,et al.  A Complete Enumeration and Classification of Two-Locus Disease Models , 1999, Human Heredity.

[2]  Chris S. Haley,et al.  Detecting epistasis in human complex traits , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[3]  W. Bateson.  Mendel's Principles of Heredity , 1910, Nature.

[4]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Community detection in graphs , 2009, ArXiv.

[5]  P. Phillips.  Epistasis — the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[6]  Danielle Smith Bassett,et al.  Small-World Brain Networks , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[7]  Rongling Wu,et al.  A statistical procedure to map high-order epistasis for complex traits , 2013, Briefings Bioinform..

[8]  H. Cordell.  Detecting gene–gene interactions that underlie human diseases , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[9]  Jason H. Moore,et al.  The Ubiquitous Nature of Epistasis in Determining Susceptibility to Common Human Diseases , 2003, Human Heredity.

[10]  Ting Hu,et al.  Characterizing genetic interactions in human disease association studies using statistical epistasis networks , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[11]  Eric Boerwinkle,et al.  Determinants of the success of whole-genome association testing. , 2005, Genome research.

[12]  Nicholas M. Pajewski,et al.  Six Degrees of Epistasis: Statistical Network Models for GWAS , 2011, Front. Gene..

[13]  T. Reich,et al.  A perspective on epistasis: limits of models displaying no main effect. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.

[14]  D. Clayton,et al.  Genome-wide association studies: theoretical and practical concerns , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[15]  Andreas Ziegler,et al.  On safari to Random Jungle: a fast implementation of Random Forests for high-dimensional data , 2010, Bioinform..

[16]  K. Mather,et al.  The Description of Genic Interactions in Continuous Variation , 1955 .

[17]  Todd Holden,et al.  A flexible computational framework for detecting, characterizing, and interpreting statistical patterns of epistasis in genetic studies of human disease susceptibility. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  P. Gaffney,et al.  Basic and translational research , 2011 .

[19]  Jason H. Moore,et al.  BIOINFORMATICS REVIEW , 2005 .

[20]  Jason H. Moore,et al.  A global view of epistasis , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[21]  H. Cordell.  Epistasis: what it means, what it doesn't mean, and statistical methods to detect it in humans. , 2002, Human molecular genetics.

[22]  A. Singleton,et al.  Genomewide association studies and human disease. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Z. Zeng,et al.  Modeling Quantitative Trait Loci and Interpretation of Models , 2005, Genetics.

[24]  Peggy Hall,et al.  The NHGRI GWAS Catalog, a curated resource of SNP-trait associations , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  Andrew P Morris,et al.  Basic statistical analysis in genetic case-control studies , 2011, Nature Protocols.

[26]  L. Penrose,et al.  THE CORRELATION BETWEEN RELATIVES ON THE SUPPOSITION OF MENDELIAN INHERITANCE , 2022 .

[27]  R. Fisher.  XV.—The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance. , 1919, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.

[28]  Jason H. Moore,et al.  STUDENTJAMA. The challenges of whole-genome approaches to common diseases. , 2004, JAMA.

[29]  J. Rice,et al.  Two‐Locus models of disease , 1992, Genetic epidemiology.

[30]  Mario Cortina-Borja,et al.  Epistasis in sporadic Alzheimer's disease , 2009, Neurobiology of Aging.

[31]  Andreas Ziegler,et al.  On safari to Random Jungle: a fast implementation of Random Forests for high-dimensional data , 2010, Bioinform..

[32]  Andrew D. Johnson,et al.  Bmc Medical Genetics an Open Access Database of Genome-wide Association Results , 2009 .

[33]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Genome-wide strategies for detecting multiple loci that influence complex diseases , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[34]  J. Knights,et al.  SYMPHONY, an information-theoretic method for gene–gene and gene–environment interaction analysis of disease syndromes , 2013, Heredity.

[35]  Debbie S. Yuster,et al.  A complete classification of epistatic two-locus models , 2006, BMC Genetics.

[36]  J. Hirschhorn.  Genomewide association studies--illuminating biologic pathways. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  David V Conti,et al.  A testing framework for identifying susceptibility genes in the presence of epistasis. , 2006, American journal of human genetics.

[38]  D. Allison,et al.  Detection of gene x gene interactions in genome-wide association studies of human population data. , 2007, Human heredity.

[39]  M. Daly,et al.  Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[40]  Bill C White,et al.  Encore: Genetic Association Interaction Network Centrality Pipeline and Application to SLE Exome Data , 2013, Genetic epidemiology.