The impact of management accounting, product structure, product mix algorithm, and planning horizon on manufacturing performance

Abstract This paper examines how three types of management accounting systems and two methods to determine product mix interact in both the short term and the long term to affect the manufacturing performance of two shops – one with a flat and the other with a deep product structure – in a highly automated industry that has a significantly high overhead content. Through a large-scale computer simulation, this study provides additional insights into the product mix decision through considering fluctuations caused by environmental uncertainty, using an integrated information system that integrates a manufacturing system and a management accounting system, considering the decision-outcome dynamic over time, the choice of cost content, and using both financial and non-financial performance measures. This study found that no single shop setting is best for all performance measures. The manager must determine which performance measures are the most important to their competitive success when making a decision about selecting or changing a management accounting system, product mix algorithm, or product structure.

[1]  Robert S. Kaplan,et al.  New Systems for Measurement and Control , 1991 .

[2]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Cost & Effect: Using Integrated Cost Systems to Drive Profitability and Performance , 1997 .

[3]  Vijay Govindarajan,et al.  Strategic Cost Management: The New Tool for Competitive Advantage , 1993 .

[4]  Emre A. Veral,et al.  THE PERFORMANCE OF A SIMPLE INCREMENTAL LOT‐SIZING RULE IN A MULTILEVEL INVENTORY ENVIRONMENT , 1985 .

[5]  H. Johnson,et al.  Activity-Based Management: Past, Present, and Future , 1991 .

[6]  John H. Blackstone,et al.  Theory of constraints - A status report , 2001 .

[7]  M. S. Spencer,et al.  Economic theory, cost accounting and theory of constraints: an examination of relationships and problems , 1994 .

[8]  J. Brimson.  Activity Accounting: An Activity-Based Costing Approach , 1991 .

[9]  Robert C. Kee,et al.  A comparative analysis of utilizing activity-based costing and the theory of constraints for making product-mix decisions , 2000 .

[10]  H. Thomas Johnson,et al.  Relevance Regained: From Top-down Control to Bottom-up Empowerment , 1992 .

[11]  Gerhard Plenert,et al.  Optimizing theory of constraints when multiple constrained resources exist , 1993 .

[12]  Roland Hellberg,et al.  Relevance lost? A critical discussion of different cost accounting principles in connection with decision making for both short and long term production scheduling , 1991 .

[13]  Mahesh Gupta,et al.  Activity-Based Throughput Management in a manufacturing company , 2001 .

[14]  Robert E. Markland,et al.  Quantitative Methods: Applications to Managerial Decision Making , 1987 .

[15]  Byron J. Finch,et al.  Theory of constraints and linear programming: a comparison , 1992 .

[16]  Lawrence D. Fredendall,et al.  Improving the product mix heuristic in the theory of constraints , 1997 .

[17]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Activity-based Systems: Measuring the Costs of Resource Usage , 1992 .

[18]  W. C. Benton,et al.  PRODUCT STRUCTURE COMPLEXITY AND MULTILEVEL LOT SIZING USING ALTERNATIVE COSTING POLICIES , 1985 .

[19]  Michael C. O'Guin.  The Complete Guide to Activity-Based Costing , 1991 .

[20]  R S Kaplan,et al.  Management Accounting for Advanced Technological Environments , 1989, Science.

[21]  L. Ted Moore,et al.  The Application of a Product Mix Linear Programming Model in Corporate Policy Making , 1978 .

[22]  Thomas H. Johnson,et al.  Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting , 1987 .

[23]  Bih-Ru Lea.  The Impact of Management Accounting Alternatives in Different Manufacturing Environments , 1998 .

[24]  Marc Wouters,et al.  Decision orientation of activity-based costing , 1994 .