Calculation of transfer functions for volume rendering of breast tomosynthesis imaging

Slice by slice visualization of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) data is time consuming and can hamper the interpretation of lesions such as clusters of microcalcifications. With a visualization of the object through multiple angles, 3D volume rendering (VR) provides an intuitive understanding of the underlying data at once. 3D VR may play an important complementary role in breast cancer diagnosis. Transfer functions (TFs) are a critical parameter in VR and finding good TFs is a major challenge. The purpose of this work is to study a methodology to automatically generate TFs that result in appropriate and useful VR visualizations of DBT data. For intensity-based TFs, intensity histograms were used to study possible relationships between statistics and critical intensity values in DBT data. The mean of each histogram has proved to be a valid option to automatically calculate those critical values that define these functions. At this stage, eight visualizations were obtained by combining several opacity/color intensity-based functions. Considering the gradient, ten visualizations were obtained. Nine of the ten TFs were constructed considering the peaks of gradient magnitude histograms. The tenth function was a simple linear ramp. Finally, three intensity-based and three gradient-based functions were selected and simultaneously used. This resulted in nine final VR visualizations taking both information into account. The studied approach allowed an automatic generation of opacity/color TFs based on scalar intensity and gradient magnitude histograms. In this way, the preliminary results obtained with this methodology are very encouraging about creating an adequate visualization of DBT data by VR.

[1]  William Schroeder,et al.  The Visualization Toolkit: An Object-Oriented Approach to 3-D Graphics , 1997 .

[2]  A. Arieno,et al.  DBT as a Screening Tool and a Diagnostic Tool , 2017, Current Breast Cancer Reports.

[3]  David Gur,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot observer study. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  N. Houssami,et al.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images versus Full-Field Digital Mammography for Population Screening: Outcomes from the Verona Screening Program. , 2017, Radiology.

[5]  Anderson Maciel,et al.  A Case-Based Study with Radiologists Performing Diagnosis Tasks in Virtual Reality , 2017, MedInfo.

[6]  Alireza Entezari,et al.  Volumetric Feature-Based Classification and Visibility Analysis for Transfer Function Design , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[7]  Gisella Gennaro,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study , 2010, European Radiology.

[8]  Gordon L. Kindlmann,et al.  Semi-Automatic Generation of Transfer Functions for Direct Volume Rendering , 1998, VVS.

[9]  Kwan-Liu Ma,et al.  Visibility Histograms and Visibility-Driven Transfer Functions , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[10]  Laurie L Fajardo,et al.  Value analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening in a commercially-insured US population , 2015, ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR.

[11]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications on planar projection images , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  James S. Duncan,et al.  Medical Image Analysis , 1999, IEEE Pulse.

[13]  Linda Moy,et al.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Practice Patterns Following 2011 FDA Approval: A Survey of Breast Imaging Radiologists. , 2017, Academic radiology.

[14]  Jeffrey Wayne Eberhard,et al.  3D Visualization of X-ray Tomosynthesis Digital Mammography Data: Preference Study , 2003 .

[15]  Jens H. Krüger,et al.  State of the Art in Transfer Functions for Direct Volume Rendering , 2016, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[16]  David Gur,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  G. Kindlmann Transfer Functions in Direct Volume Rendering : Design , Interface , Interaction , 2002 .

[18]  Abdal Majeid Alyassin Automatic transfer function generation for volume rendering of high-resolution x-ray 3D digital mammography images , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.