Assessing medication effects in the MTA study using neuropsychological outcomes.

BACKGROUND While studies have increasingly investigated deficits in reaction time (RT) and RT variability in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), few studies have examined the effects of stimulant medication on these important neuropsychological outcome measures. METHODS 316 children who participated in the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD (MTA) completed the Conners' Continuous Performance Test (CPT) at the 24-month assessment point. Outcome measures included standard CPT outcomes (e.g., errors of commission, mean hit reaction time (RT)) and RT indicators derived from an Ex-Gaussian distributional model (i.e., mu, sigma, and tau). RESULTS Analyses revealed significant effects of medication across all neuropsychological outcome measures. Results on the Ex-Gaussian outcome measures revealed that stimulant medication slows RT and reduces RT variability. CONCLUSIONS This demonstrates the importance of including analytic strategies that can accurately model the actual distributional pattern, including the positive skew. Further, the results of the study relate to several theoretical models of ADHD.

[1]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  J. Swanson,et al.  Reaction Time Distribution Analysis of Neuropsychological Performance in an ADHD Sample , 2006, Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence.

[3]  J. Swanson,et al.  National Institute of Mental Health Multimodal Treatment Study of ADHD follow-up: 24-month outcomes of treatment strategies for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. , 2004, Pediatrics.

[4]  E. Sonuga-Barke,et al.  The dual pathway model of AD/HD: an elaboration of neuro-developmental characteristics , 2003, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[5]  Adrian Angold,et al.  Relations Between Continuous Performance Test Performance Measures and ADHD Behaviors , 2003, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[6]  A. Angold,et al.  Continuous Performance Test Performance in a Normative Epidemiological Sample , 2003, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[7]  F. Castellanos,et al.  Neuroscience of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the search for endophenotypes , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  C. Reynolds,et al.  Clinical Applications of Continuous Performance Tests: Measuring Attention and Impulsive Responding in Children and Adults , 2001 .

[9]  F. Castellanos,et al.  Stimulant drugs and ADHD : basic and clinical neuroscience , 2001 .

[10]  C Leth-Steensen,et al.  Mean response times, variability, and skew in the responding of ADHD children: a response time distributional approach. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[11]  J. Sergeant The cognitive-energetic model: an empirical approach to Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder , 2000, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[12]  Russell A. Barkley,et al.  ADHD and The Nature of Self-Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[13]  J. Meere,et al.  Ritalin: An energetic factor? , 2000 .

[14]  D. Shaffer,et al.  NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version IV (NIMH DISC-IV): description, differences from previous versions, and reliability of some common diagnoses. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[15]  Stephen P. Hinshaw,et al.  A 14-month randomized clinical trial of treatment strategies for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The MTA Cooperative Group. Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD. , 1999, Archives of general psychiatry.

[16]  V. Douglas Cognitive Control Processes in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder , 1999 .

[17]  Herbert C. Quay,et al.  Handbook of disruptive behavior disorders , 1999 .

[18]  H. Kraemer,et al.  National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD (the MTA). Design challenges and choices. , 1997, Archives of general psychiatry.

[19]  R. Barkley Attention‐Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Self‐Regulation, and Time: Toward a More Comprehensive Theory , 1997, Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP.

[20]  J. Epstein,et al.  The effects of anxiety on continuous performance test functioning in an ADHD clinic sample , 1997 .

[21]  C. Carlson,et al.  Behavioral Characteristics of DSM-IV ADHD Subtypes in a School-Based Population , 1997, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[22]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  RTSYS: A DOS application for the analysis of reaction time data , 1996 .

[23]  R. Tannock,et al.  Differential effects of methylphenidate on working memory in ADHD children with and without comorbid anxiety. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[24]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  William L. Hays,et al.  Statistics, 5th ed. , 1994 .

[26]  D. Routh,et al.  Disruptive behavior disorders in childhood , 1994 .

[27]  J. Meere,et al.  Toward an Empirical Child Psychopathology , 1994 .

[28]  Francis M. Crinella,et al.  Effect of Stimulant Medication on Children with Attention Deficit Disorder: A “Review of Reviews” , 1993 .

[29]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[30]  D. C. Howell Fundamental Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1985 .

[31]  Swanson Jm Measures of cognitive functioning appropriate for use in pediatric psychopharmacological research studies. , 1985 .

[32]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[33]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.