A Review of Facility Effects on Hall Effect Thrusters

An increasing number and variety of missions are benefiting from Hall Effect Thrusters supplied by different suppliers utilizing a variety of development processes and facilities. This situation, in part, has led to multiple recommendations for standardized approaches in all phases of thruster developments and integration. To help inform such standardization, a review was conducted to collate open-literature data on the measurement and influence of ground test facility pressures on the performance and lifetime evaluations of Hall Effect Thrusters. No flight thrust data were available, so comparisons of ground and in-space thruster performances weren’t possible. The review found that pressures are obtained using a range of approaches which complicate comparisons of pressure effects in different facilities. The limited data base on the influence of pressure on thruster performance exhibited extreme variations and recent, non-invasive diagnostics efforts both provide new physical insights into the interaction of facility environments with thrusters and indicate the use of simple, ingestion correction factors are inadequate. Few data were found that directly evaluated the influence of pressure on thruster lifetime and the cited non-invasive diagnostics studies suggest that effects other than partial pressures of contaminants may be critical. No data on facility effects on swirl torques were found. Overall, the review illustrated the extremely situational nature of the effects of facility pressure and strongly supports the establishment of test standards for Hall Effect Thruster programs.

[1]  A. Gallimore HOT FLOW PRESSURE MAP OF A VACUUM FACILITY AS A FUNCTION OF FLOW RATE TO STUDY FACILITY EFFECTS , 2003 .

[2]  Michel Dubois,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the , 1995 .

[3]  Alec D. Gallimore,et al.  Characterizing Vacuum Facility Backpressure Effects on the Performance of a Hall Thruster , 2001 .

[4]  K. Kozubskij,et al.  Disturbance torques generated by the stationary plasma thruster , 1993 .

[5]  William A. Hargus,et al.  Background Pressure Eects on Internal and Near-eld Ion Velocity Distribution of the BHT-600 Hall Thruster , 2008 .

[6]  Ioannis G. Mikellides,et al.  Wall Sheath and Electron Mobility Modeling in Hybrid-PIC Hall Thruster Simulations , 2007 .

[7]  A. Semenkin,et al.  Overview of Electric Propulsion Activities in Russia , 2004 .

[8]  P. Lasgorceix,et al.  Control of the Ceramic Erosion by Optical Emission Spectroscopy: Parametric Studies of SPT-100ML , 2004 .

[9]  Lockheed Martin,et al.  An Overview of Electric Propulsion Activities in US Industry - 2005 , 2005 .

[10]  John M. Sankovic,et al.  Operating characteristics of the Russian D-55 thruster with anode layer , 1994 .

[11]  Alec D. Gallimore,et al.  Pressure map of a facility as a function of flow rate to study facility effects , 2002 .

[12]  Raymond Holanda,et al.  SENSITIVITY OF HOT-CATHODE IONIZATION VACUUM GAGES IN SEVERAL GASES , 1972 .

[13]  Alec D. Gallimore,et al.  Vacuum Chamber Pressure Maps of a Hall Thruster Cold-Flow Expansion , 2004 .

[14]  V. Zhurin EFFECT OF BACKGROUND NITROGEN AND OXYGEN ON INSULATOR EROSION IN THE SPT - , 2008 .

[15]  John M. Sankovic,et al.  Performance evaluation of the Russian SPT-100 thruster at NASA LeRC , 1994 .

[16]  Ulhas Kamath,et al.  Intelsat 10 Plasma Propulsion System Initial Flight Operations , 2005 .

[17]  V. K. Rawlin,et al.  Effect of facility background gases on internal erosion of the 30-cm Hg ion thruster , 1978 .

[18]  Raymond J. Sedwick,et al.  The Erosion Prediction Impact on Current Hall Thruster Model Development , 2008 .

[19]  S. Mazouffre,et al.  Two Ways to Evaluate the Xe+ Ion Flow Velocity in a Hall Effect Thruster , 2004 .

[20]  Brett A. Smith,et al.  Managing momentum on the dawn low thrust mission , 2009, 2009 IEEE Aerospace conference.

[21]  D. Manzella Stationary Plasma Thruster Ion Velocity Distribution , 1994 .

[22]  John R. Brophy,et al.  Dawn ion propulsion system – initial checkout after launch , 2009 .

[23]  A. Semenkin,et al.  Development of Electric Propulsion Standards-Current Status and Further Activity . , 2001 .