Prospective comparison of whole-body bone SPECT and sodium 18F-fluoride PET in the detection of bone metastases from breast cancer

ObjectiveThe superiority of sodium 18F-fluoride PET (18F-PET)/computed tomography (CT) over planar and single field-of-view single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) bone scintigraphy with 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate in bone metastases detection has been established. The present study prospectively compares whole-body 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate SPECT (WB-SPECT) and 18F-PET performance indices for the detection of bone metastases in breast cancer. MethodsA total of 41 pairs of studies in female breast cancer patients (average age 58 years, range 30–75) were included. Half-time WB-SPECT and 18F-PET/CT were performed at a 4-day average interval (range 0–36 days), with subsequent fusion of CT to WB-SPECT. Two readers independently interpreted the studies, with differences resolved by consensus. Composite gold standard included the CT component of the 18F-PET/CT study with follow-up CT, MRI, 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose-PET/CT, and bone scans. ResultsOn patient-based analysis, metastases were diagnosed in 21 patients, with 19 patients detected by WB-SPECT and 21 with 18F-PET, the latter being the only modality to detect a single metastasis in two patients. The sensitivity of WB-SPECT and 18F-PET was 90 and 100% (P=NS), and the specificity were 95 and 85%, respectively (P=NS). On lesion-based analysis, 284 total sites of increased uptake were found. WB-SPECT detected 171/284 (60%) and 18F-PET 268/284 (94%) lesions, with good interobserver agreement for WB-SPECT (&kgr;=0.679) and excellent agreement for 18F-PET (&kgr;=0.798). The final analysis classified 204 lesions as benign and 80 as metastases. WB-SPECT identified 121 benign and 50 malignant sites compared with 192 and 76, respectively, for 18F-PET. WB-SPECT and 18F-PET had a sensitivity of 63 vs. 95%, P-value of less than 0.001, and a specificity of 97 vs. 96% (P=NS), respectively, on lesion-based analysis. Conclusion18F-PET had higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of bone metastases from breast cancer compared with WB-SPECT, showing a statistically significant 32% increase on lesion-based analysis.

[1]  Z. Keidar,et al.  Whole-body bone SPECT in breast cancer patients: the future bone scan protocol? , 2015, Nuclear medicine communications.

[2]  R. Coleman,et al.  Impact of 18F-Fluoride PET on Intended Management of Patients with Cancers Other Than Prostate Cancer: Results from the National Oncologic PET Registry , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  Lalit Kumar,et al.  The role of 18F-fluoride PET-CT in the detection of bone metastases in patients with breast, lung and prostate carcinoma: a comparison with FDG PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scan , 2013, Japanese Journal of Radiology.

[4]  A. Piccardo,et al.  Detection of metastatic bone lesions in breast cancer patients: fused (18)F-Fluoride-PET/MDCT has higher accuracy than MDCT. Preliminary experience. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[5]  Z. Keidar,et al.  Half-Time SPECT Acquisition with Resolution Recovery for Tc-MIBI SPECT Imaging in the Assessment of Hyperparathyroidism , 2012, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[6]  S Ted Treves,et al.  Pediatric 99mTc-MDP bone SPECT with ordered subset expectation maximization iterative reconstruction with isotropic 3D resolution recovery. , 2010, Radiology.

[7]  Michael G. Stabin,et al.  SNM Practice Guideline for Sodium 18F-Fluoride PET/CT Bone Scans 1.0* , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  U. Tateishi,et al.  A meta-analysis of 18F-Fluoride positron emission tomography for assessment of metastatic bone tumor , 2010, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[9]  S. Ben-Haim,et al.  Breast cancer: role of SPECT and PET in imaging bone metastases. , 2009, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[10]  T. Ruddy,et al.  Half-Time SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with Attenuation Correction , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  S Ted Treves,et al.  Skeletal PET with 18F-Fluoride: Applying New Technology to an Old Tracer* , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  Mark T Madsen,et al.  Recent Advances in SPECT Imaging , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  Lana Volokh,et al.  Half-time bone SPECT acquisition - Assessment of a new collimator detector response (CDR) reconstruction algorithm , 2006 .

[14]  U. Metser,et al.  The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  A. Viera,et al.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. , 2005, Family medicine.

[16]  H. Schirrmeister,et al.  F‐18 NaF PET for Detection of Bone Metastases in Lung Cancer: Accuracy, Cost‐Effectiveness, and Impact on Patient Management , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  H. Schirrmeister,et al.  Prospective evaluation of the clinical value of planar bone scans, SPECT, and (18)F-labeled NaF PET in newly diagnosed lung cancer. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  J Kotzerke,et al.  Sensitivity in detecting osseous lesions depends on anatomic localization: planar bone scintigraphy versus 18F PET. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  H. Schirrmeister,et al.  Early detection and accurate description of extent of metastatic bone disease in breast cancer with fluoride ion and positron emission tomography. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  M. Blau,et al.  Fluorine-18: a new isotope for bone scanning. , 1962, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  S. Fanti,et al.  Of standard of reference and accuracy: the problem of truth in imaging , 2015, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[22]  R. Carretta,et al.  Society of Nuclear Medicine Procedure Guideline for Bone Scintigraphy version 3 . 0 , approved June 20 , 2003 , 2003 .

[23]  M. Blau,et al.  18 F-fluoride for bone imaging. , 1972, Seminars in nuclear medicine.