Operator-adapted finite element wavelets : theory and applications to a posteriori error estimation and adaptive computational modeling

We propose a simple and unified approach for a posteriori error estimation and adaptive mesh refinement in finite element analysis using multiresolution signal processing principles. Given a sequence of nested discretizations of a domain we begin by constructing approximation spaces at each level of discretization spanned by conforming finite element interpolation functions. The solution to the virtual work equation can then be expressed as a telescopic sum consisting of the solution on the coarsest mesh along with a sequence of error terms denoted as two-level errors. These error terms are the projections of the solution onto complementary spaces that are scale-orthogonal with respect to the inner product induced by the weak-form of the governing differential operator. The problem of generating a compact, yet accurate representation of the solution then reduces to that of generating a compact, yet accurate representation of each of these error components. This problem is solved in three steps: (a) we first efficiently construct a set of scale-orthogonal wavelets that form a Riesz stable basis (in the energy-norm) for the complementary spaces; (b) we then efficiently estimate the contribution of each wavelet to the two-level error and finally (c) we select a subset of the wavelets at each level to preserve and solve exactly for the corresponding coefficients. Our approach has several advantages over a posteriori error estimation and adaptive refinement techniques in vogue in finite element analysis. First, in contrast to the true error, the two-level errors can be estimated very accurately even on coarse meshes. Second, mesh refinement is carried out by the addition of wavelets rather than element subdivision. This implies that the technique does not have to directly deal with the handling of irregular vertices. Third, the error estimation and adaptive refinement steps use the same basis. Therefore, the estimates accurately predict how much the error will reduce upon mesh refinement. Finally, the proposed approach naturally and easily accomodates error estimation and adaptive refinement based on both the energy norm as well any bounded linear functional of interest (i.e., goal-oriented error estimation and adaptivity). We demonstrate the application of our approach to the adaptive solution of second and fourthorder problems such as heat transfer, linear elasticity and deformation of thin plates. Thesis Supervisor: Kevin S. Amaratunga Title: Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering

[1]  Randolph E. Bank,et al.  A posteriori error estimates based on hierarchical bases , 1993 .

[2]  Burak Aksoylu,et al.  AN ODYSSEY INTO LOCAL REFINEMENT AND MULTILEVEL PRECONDITIONING II: STABILIZING HIERARCHICAL BASIS METHODS , 2005 .

[3]  I. Babuska,et al.  Hierarchical Finite Element Approaches Error Estimates and Adaptive Refinement , 1981 .

[4]  Gilbert Strang,et al.  Finite element multiwavelets , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE-SP International Symposium on Time- Frequency and Time-Scale Analysis.

[5]  Harry Yserentant,et al.  On the multi-level splitting of finite element spaces , 1986 .

[6]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  W. Dahmen Wavelet and multiscale methods for operator equations , 1997, Acta Numerica.

[8]  L. R. Scott,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods , 1994 .

[9]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  A simple error estimator and adaptive procedure for practical engineerng analysis , 1987 .

[10]  Panayot S. Vassilevski,et al.  Stabilizing the Hierarchical Basis by Approximate Wavelets, I: Theory , 1997 .

[11]  Wim Sweldens,et al.  The lifting scheme: a construction of second generation wavelets , 1998 .

[12]  I. Babuska,et al.  Finite Element Analysis , 2021 .

[13]  Kevin Amaratunga,et al.  Wavelet-Galerkin solution of boundary value problems , 1997 .

[14]  J. Oden,et al.  A Posteriori Error Estimation in Finite Element Analysis , 2000 .

[15]  Claes Johnson,et al.  Introduction to Adaptive Methods for Differential Equations , 1995, Acta Numerica.

[16]  Tony DeRose,et al.  Multiresolution analysis for surfaces of arbitrary topological type , 1997, TOGS.

[17]  I. Fried,et al.  THE l2 AND l∞ CONDITION NUMBERS OF THE FINITE ELEMENT STIFFNESS AND MASS MATRICES, AND THE POINTWISE CONVERGENCE OF THE METHOD , 1973 .

[18]  K. Bathe Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[19]  Albert Cohen,et al.  Wavelet Methods for Second-Order Elliptic Problems, Preconditioning, and Adaptivity , 1999, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[20]  Serge Prudhomme,et al.  On goal-oriented error estimation for elliptic problems: application to the control of pointwise errors , 1999 .

[21]  A Multiscale Wavelet Solver with O(n) Complexity , 1995 .

[22]  Panayot S. Vassilevski,et al.  Stabilizing the Hierarchical Basis by Approximate Wavelets II: Implementation and Numerical Results , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[23]  D. Hardin,et al.  Fractal Functions and Wavelet Expansions Based on Several Scaling Functions , 1994 .

[24]  Harry Yserentant,et al.  Hierarchical bases , 1992 .

[25]  Clive L. Dym,et al.  Energy and Finite Element Methods In Structural Mechanics : SI Units , 2017 .

[26]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  THEORY OF PLATES AND SHELLS , 1959 .

[27]  Rolf Rannacher,et al.  A Feed-Back Approach to Error Control in Finite Element Methods: Basic Analysis and Examples , 1996 .

[28]  R. Melosh BASIS FOR DERIVATION OF MATRICES FOR THE DIRECT STIFFNESS METHOD , 1963 .

[29]  William S. Slaughter The Linearized Theory of Elasticity , 2001 .

[30]  Thomas Grätsch,et al.  Review: A posteriori error estimation techniques in practical finite element analysis , 2005 .

[31]  Truong Q. Nguyen,et al.  Wavelets and filter banks , 1996 .

[32]  R. Bank,et al.  The hierarchical basis multigrid method , 1988 .

[33]  John R. Williams,et al.  Wavelet–Galerkin solutions for one‐dimensional partial differential equations , 1994 .

[34]  Kevin Amaratunga,et al.  Generalized hierarchical bases: a Wavelet‐Ritz‐Galerkin framework for Lagrangian FEM , 2005 .

[35]  K. Bathe,et al.  Influence functions and goal‐oriented error estimation for finite element analysis of shell structures , 2005 .

[36]  Randolph E. Bank,et al.  PLTMG - a software package for solving elliptic partial differential equations: users' guide 8.0 , 1998, Software, environments, tools.

[37]  Raghunathan Sudarshan,et al.  A Parallel Hierarchical Solver for the Poisson Equation , 2003 .

[38]  I. Daubechies Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets , 1988 .

[39]  Wolfgang Dahmen,et al.  Adaptive wavelet methods for elliptic operator equations: Convergence rates , 2001, Math. Comput..

[40]  Kevin Amaratunga,et al.  Spatially Adapted Multiwavelets and Sparse Representation of Integral Equations on General Geometries , 2002, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[41]  R. Coifman,et al.  Fast wavelet transforms and numerical algorithms I , 1991 .

[42]  Michael J. Holst,et al.  Generalized Green's Functions and the Effective Domain of Influence , 2005, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[43]  M. Rivara Mesh Refinement Processes Based on the Generalized Bisection of Simplices , 1984 .

[44]  I. Daubechies,et al.  Biorthogonal bases of compactly supported wavelets , 1992 .

[45]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Wavelet-Like Bases for the Fast Solution of Second-Kind Integral Equations , 1993, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[46]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[47]  I. Weinreich,et al.  Wavelet-Galerkin methods: An adapted biorthogonal wavelet basis , 1993 .

[48]  P. Mikusinski,et al.  Introduction to Hilbert spaces with applications , 1990 .