Event-related brain potentials in response to novel sounds in dementia

OBJECTIVE Non-target, deviant stimuli generate an earlier latency, front-central novelty P3, whereas correctly detected task-relevant stimuli generate a parietal maximal target P3. We examined whether the P3 component to novel stimuli is affected by dementing processes, and is therefore useful for distinguishing Alzheimer's type dementia (AD) from vascular dementia (VD). METHODS We recorded ERPs to task-relevant stimuli (target P3) and novel task-irrelevant stimuli (novelty P3) in an auditory oddball task in AD (n = 16), VD (n = 16), and age-matched controls (n = 18). The amplitude, latency, and scalp topography of target and novelty P3 were compared among 3 groups using ANOVA. The relationship between P3 measures and intelligence scores were evaluated by correlation analysis. RESULTS The amplitude, latency and scalp topography of the target P3 were comparably affected by both AD and VD. However, the amplitude of the novelty P3 was markedly reduced in VD, but not in AD, and the scalp topographics were different in the 3 groups. The amplitude was maximal at frontal sites in controls, at central sites in AD, and at parietal sites in VD. The target P3 latency was prolonged in both AD and VD, whereas the novelty P3 latency was only prolonged in VD. AD was discriminated satisfactorily from VD by using the novelty amplitude at Cz and the ratio of the amplitudes at Fz and Pz as independent variables. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that the response to novel stimuli is differentially affected by dementia with degenerative and vascular etiology.

[1]  A. Kok,et al.  P3 scalp topography to target and novel visual stimuli in children of alcoholics. , 1998, Alcohol.

[2]  D. Friedman,et al.  A developmental study of the effect of temporal order on the ERPs elicited by novel environmental sounds. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  V. Jousmäki,et al.  Habituation of auditory N100 correlates with amygdaloid volumes and frontal functions in age-associated memory impairment , 1995, Physiology & Behavior.

[4]  J. Ford,et al.  Combined event‐related fMRI and EEG evidence for temporal—parietal cortex activation during target detection , 1997, Neuroreport.

[5]  R. Knight Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  M. Onofrj,et al.  Mapping of event-related potentials to auditory and visual odd-ball paradigms in patients affected by different forms of dementia. , 1991, European neurology.

[7]  S. Kobayashi,et al.  Frontal white matter lesions and dementia in lacunar infarction. , 1990, Stroke.

[8]  R. Katzman.,et al.  Pathological verification of ischemic score in differentiation of dementias , 1980, Annals of neurology.

[9]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic recordings. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[10]  J V Haxby,et al.  Visuospatial attention in dementia of the Alzheimer type. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  J. Ford,et al.  Clinical application of the P3 component of event-related potentials. II. Dementia, depression and schizophrenia. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  F E Bloom,et al.  P300 latency reflects the degree of cognitive decline in dementing illness. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  S. Yamaguchi,et al.  Anterior and posterior association cortex contributions to the somatosensory P300 , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  R T Knight,et al.  Age effects on the P300 to novel somatosensory stimuli. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  M. Fabiani,et al.  Changes in brain activity patterns in aging: the novelty oddball. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[16]  D. Goodin,et al.  Electrophysiological differences between subtypes of dementia. , 1986, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  E. Courchesne Neurophysiological correlates of cognitive development: changes in long-latency event-related potentials from childhood to adulthood. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  F E Bloom,et al.  P300 assessment of early Alzheimer's disease. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  ERP amplitude and scalp distribution to target and novel events: effects of temporal order in young, middle-aged and older adults. , 1994, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[20]  A. Kertesz,et al.  Neuropsychological deficits in vascular dementia vs Alzheimer's disease. Frontal lobe deficits prominent in vascular dementia. , 1994, Archives of neurology.

[21]  D. Clair,et al.  P3 and other Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials in Presenile Dementia Alzheimer Type and Alcoholic Korsakoff Syndrome , 1985, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[22]  Anthony F Jorm,et al.  Controlled and automatic information processing in senile dementia: a review , 1986, Psychological Medicine.

[23]  P Ullsperger,et al.  The P300 to novel and target events: a spatio–temporal dipole model analysis , 1995, Neuroreport.

[24]  R. Knight,et al.  P300 generation by novel somatosensory stimuli. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  M. Folstein,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease , 1984, Neurology.

[26]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  A. Starr,et al.  Latency variability of the components of auditory event-related potentials to infrequent stimuli in aging, Alzheimer-type dementia, and depression. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  R. Verleger,et al.  Reduction of P3b in patients with temporo-parietal lesions. , 1994, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[29]  R. Knight,et al.  Contributions of temporal-parietal junction to the human auditory P3 , 1989, Brain Research.

[30]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Long-latency evoked potentials to irrelevant, deviant stimuli. , 1976, Behavioral biology.

[31]  G. C. Román,et al.  Vascular dementia , 1993, Neurology.

[32]  D Friedman,et al.  Age-related changes in scalp topography to novel and target stimuli. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[33]  K. Squires,et al.  Age-related variations in evoked potentials to auditory stimuli in normal human subjects. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[34]  R. Knight Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection , 1996, Nature.

[35]  H. Pratt,et al.  Improved detection of auditory P3 abnormality in dementia using a variety of stimuli , 1995, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[36]  H Shibasaki,et al.  Auditory long latency event-related potentials in Alzheimer's disease and multi-infarct dementia. , 1988, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.