Sinus pilonidalis: Sekundäre Wundheilung vs. Limberg-Lappenplastik

[1]  S. Dahmann,et al.  Therapievergleich bei infiziertem Sinus pilonidalis – Unterschiede von Narbenqualität und Outcome nach Sekundärheilung oder Limberglappenplastik im Rahmen einer prospektiven Studie , 2016, Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie.

[2]  A. Meysamie,et al.  Karydakis flap versus excision-only technique in pilonidal disease. , 2015, The Journal of surgical research.

[3]  A. Hesketh,et al.  Neonatal esophageal perforation: nonoperative management. , 2015, The Journal of surgical research.

[4]  S. Sözen,et al.  Effectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in recurrent pilonidal sinus disease , 2015, Clinics.

[5]  J. Emparanza,et al.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing different techniques with primary closure for chronic pilonidal sinus , 2014, Techniques in Coloproctology.

[6]  C. Maurer,et al.  Primary wound closure with a Limberg flap vs. secondary wound healing after excision of a pilonidal sinus: a multicentre randomised controlled study , 2014, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[7]  Ahmet Karaca,et al.  Comparison of Limberg flap and excision and primary closure of pilonidal sinus disease, in terms of quality of life and complications , 2013, Journal of the Korean Surgical Society.

[8]  K. Arslan,et al.  Which flap method should be preferred for the treatment of pilonidal sinus? A prospective randomized study , 2013, Techniques in Coloproctology.

[9]  P. Khan,et al.  Limberg Flap Versus Primary Closure in the Treatment of Primary Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Disease; A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2013, Indian Journal of Surgery.

[10]  J. Horwood,et al.  Primary closure or rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for the management of primary sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease? A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2012, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[11]  F. Yetisir,et al.  Limberg flap is better for the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus. Results of a 767 patients series with an at least five years follow-up period. , 2011, Chirurgia.

[12]  D. Jayne,et al.  Prospective Analysis of Cosmesis, Morbidity, and Patient Satisfaction Following Limberg Flap for the Treatment of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus , 2011, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[13]  C. Delaney.  Commentary on ‘T4 colorectal cancer: is laparoscopic resection contraindicated?’ by Bretagnol et al. , 2011, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[14]  C. Nigro,et al.  Randomized comparison of Limberg flap versus modified primary closure for the treatment of pilonidal disease. , 2010, American journal of surgery.

[15]  J. Bruce,et al.  Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[16]  M. Shamim,et al.  Open excision with secondary healing versus rhomboid excision with Limberg transposition flap in the management of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. , 2009, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.

[17]  J. Bruce,et al.  Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[18]  A. Kanık,et al.  Randomized clinical trial comparing primary closure with the Limberg flap in the treatment of primary sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease , 2005, The British journal of surgery.

[19]  T. Ertan,et al.  Does technique alter quality of life after pilonidal sinus surgery? , 2005, American journal of surgery.

[20]  S. Leventoğlu,et al.  Modified Limberg flap reconstruction compares favourably with primary repair for pilonidal sinus surgery , 2004, ANZ journal of surgery.

[21]  R. Koch,et al.  Primary Closure Techniques in Chronic Pilonidal Sinus , 2002, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[22]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[23]  G. Karydakis.  New approach to the problem of pilonidal sinus. , 1973, Lancet.