Why High-technology Firms Choose to Locate in or near Metropolitan Areas

Various studies have provided evidence of the advantages of the ability of metropolitan areas to attract hi-tech industries, which employ advanced technology and are strongly involved in the process of innovation. This paper presents the results of an empirical study of the location choice of Israeli hi-tech industries within a metropolitan area, carried out in the Northern region of Israel (which encompasses the Haifa metropolitan area and its surrounding localities) and based on field-survey data obtained from hi-tech plants. The study investigates the effect of different factors on location choice and also identifies the direct contribution of each factor to the probability of choosing the metropolitan area as a preferred location. The implications of these findings for industrial policy are also discussed.

[1]  Edward J. Malecki,et al.  Corporate Organization of R and D and the Location of Technological Activities , 1980 .

[2]  Amnon Frenkel,et al.  Generating and Evaluating Alternative Regional Development Plans , 1997 .

[3]  George Kozmetsky,et al.  Creating the Technopolis: Linking Technology Commercialization and Economic Development , 1988 .

[4]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Collaborative ventures between U.S. and foreign manufacturing firms , 1989 .

[5]  A. Thwaites.  Some evidence of regional variations in the introduction and diffusion of industrial products and processes within British manufacturing industry , 1982 .

[6]  George Kozmetsky,et al.  The Austin/San Antonio Corridor: The Dynamics of a Developing Technopolis , 1987 .

[7]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Entrepreneurs In High Technology , 1991 .

[8]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[9]  G. Sweeney,et al.  Innovation, Entrepreneurs and Regional Development , 1987 .

[10]  E. Razin.  The Role of Ownership Characteristics in the Industrial Development of Israel's Peripheral Towns , 1988 .

[11]  Knut Koschatzky,et al.  Firm Characteristics, Location and Regional Innovation: A Comparison Between Israeli and German Industrial Firms , 2001 .

[12]  Lawrence A. Brown,et al.  Innovation Diffusion: A New Perspective , 1984 .

[13]  Maryann P. Feldman.  The geography of innovation , 1994 .

[14]  M. Fischer.  Innovation, Diffusion and Regions , 1989 .

[15]  Paul D. Gottlieb.  Amenities as an Economic Development Tool: Is there Enough Evidence? , 1994 .

[16]  S. Fotheringham,et al.  The Impact of Space on the Application Of Discrete Choice Models , 1990 .

[17]  A. Pred,et al.  City-systems in advanced economies: Past growth, present processes and future development options , 1977 .

[18]  E. Herzfeld,et al.  Joint ventures , 1989 .

[19]  P. Nijkamp.  Information Center Policy in a Spatial Development Perspective , 1988, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[20]  Edward J. Malecki,et al.  Locational trends in R and D by large US corporations, 1965 to 1977 , 1979 .

[21]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  Reindustrialization and Technology , 1985 .

[22]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Analysis of Episodes in Urban Event Histories , 1984 .

[23]  C. Freeman.  Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues , 1991 .

[24]  Roger W. Schmenner,et al.  Making Business Location Decisions , 1982 .

[25]  Spatial dispersion of technological innovation : a case study for the Netherlands by means of partial least squares , 1989 .

[26]  P. Flynn.  Technology life cycles and state economic development strategies , 1994 .

[27]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[28]  Stephen Roper,et al.  Different Paths to Success—The Growth of the Electronics Sector in Ireland and Israel , 2000 .

[29]  D. Felsenstein.  University-related science parks - 'seedbeds' or 'enclaves' of innovation? , 1994 .

[30]  Daniel Felsenstein,et al.  High Technology Firms and Metropolitan Locational Choice in Israel; A Look at the Determinants , 1996 .

[31]  Alan A. Carruth,et al.  Location Choice and Labour Market Perceptions: A Discrete Choice Study , 1989 .

[32]  Kenneth Button,et al.  High-technology companies : an examination of their transport needs /Kenneth Button , 1988 .

[33]  J. Jacobs.  The Death and Life of Great American Cities , 1962 .

[34]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  The incubator hypothesis: Re-vitalization of metropolitan areas? , 1988 .

[35]  R. Camagni.  Spatial diffusion of pervasive process innovation , 1985 .

[36]  M. Storper.  Technology and New Regional Growth Complexes: The Economics of Discontinuous Spatial Development , 1986 .

[37]  E. Malecki.  AGGLOMERATION AND INTRA‐FIRM LINKAGE IN R & D LOCATION IN THE UNITED STATES , 1979 .

[38]  R. Florida,et al.  The Breakthrough Illusion: Corporate America's Failure To Move From Innovation To Mass Production , 1990 .

[39]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Entrepreneurs in high technology : lessons from MIT and beyond , 1991 .

[40]  Amnon Frenkel,et al.  Can regional policy affect firms' innovation potential in lagging regions? , 2000 .

[41]  E. J. Davelaar,et al.  Regional Economic Analysis of Innovation and Incubation , 1991 .

[42]  Manufacturers' Location Decisions: Do Surveys Provide Helpful Insights? , 1994 .

[43]  D. Rubinfeld,et al.  Econometric models and economic forecasts , 2002 .

[44]  Amnon Frenkel,et al.  Local milieu and innovations: Some empirical results , 1998 .

[45]  R. P. Oakey,et al.  Innovation and regional growth in small high technology firms: Evidence from Britain and the USA , 1984 .

[46]  Paul Geroski,et al.  Do Innovating Firms Outperform Non Innovators , 1992 .

[47]  Jim Northcott,et al.  Microelectronics in British Industry: The Pattern of Change , 1984 .

[48]  A. Scott.  Locational Patterns and Dynamics of Industrial Activity in the Modern Metropolis , 1982 .