Sentence Syntax and Content in the Human Temporal Lobe: An fMRI Adaptation Study in Auditory and Visual Modalities

Priming effects have been well documented in behavioral psycholinguistics experiments: The processing of a word or a sentence is typically facilitated when it shares lexico-semantic or syntactic features with a previously encountered stimulus. Here, we used fMRI priming to investigate which brain areas show adaptation to the repetition of a sentence's content or syntax. Participants read or listened to sentences organized in series which could or not share similar syntactic constructions and/or lexico-semantic content. The repetition of lexico-semantic content yielded adaptation in most of the temporal and frontal sentence processing network, both in the visual and the auditory modalities, even when the same lexico-semantic content was expressed using variable syntactic constructions. No fMRI adaptation effect was observed when the same syntactic construction was repeated. Yet behavioral priming was observed at both syntactic and semantic levels in a separate experiment where participants detected sentence endings. We discuss a number of possible explanations for the absence of syntactic priming in the fMRI experiments, including the possibility that the conglomerate of syntactic properties defining “a construction” is not an actual object assembled during parsing.

[1]  Bernard Mazoyer,et al.  Impact of modality and linguistic complexity during reading and listening tasks , 2007, NeuroImage.

[2]  C. Fiebach,et al.  The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  A. Friederici,et al.  Auditory Language Comprehension: An Event-Related fMRI Study on the Processing of Syntactic and Lexical Information , 2000, Brain and Language.

[4]  J. Hayes Cognition and the development of language , 1970 .

[5]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Distinct unimodal and multimodal regions for word processing in the left temporal cortex , 2004, NeuroImage.

[6]  Yosef Grodzinsky,et al.  fMRI adaptation dissociates syntactic complexity dimensions , 2010, NeuroImage.

[7]  H. Neville,et al.  An Event-Related fMRI Study of Syntactic and Semantic Violations , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[8]  Andrew J. Stewart,et al.  Syntactic priming in spoken production: Linguistic and temporal interference , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[9]  A. Friederici Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  J. K. Bock Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  C. Clifton,et al.  Parallel structure: A source of facilitation in sentence comprehension , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[12]  C. Price The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009 , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Linda Wheeldon,et al.  Syntactic priming in spoken sentence production – an online study , 2001, Cognition.

[14]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Neural responses to the production and comprehension of syntax in identical utterances , 2004, Brain and Language.

[15]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[16]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Syntactic Processing in Left Prefrontal Cortex Is Independent of Lexical Meaning , 2001, NeuroImage.

[17]  N. Alpert,et al.  Localization of Syntactic Comprehension by Positron Emission Tomography , 1996, Brain and Language.

[18]  M. Pickering,et al.  Syntactic priming in language production , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  E. Kaan,et al.  The brain circuitry of syntactic comprehension , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  A. Syrota,et al.  The Cortical Representation of Speech , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  G. Dell,et al.  Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production , 2007, Cognition.

[22]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[23]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[24]  Guillaume P. Dehaene,et al.  Functional segregation of cortical language areas by sentence repetition , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[25]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  Role of surface and base structure in the perception of sentences , 1967 .

[26]  C. J. Price,et al.  An fMRI Study of Syntactic Adaptation , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Steven L. Small,et al.  Repetition Suppression for Spoken Sentences and the Effect of Task Demands , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Michael W. L. Chee,et al.  Common and Segregated Neuronal Networks for Different Languages Revealed Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Adaptation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  Holly Branigan,et al.  Syntactic Priming , 2007, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[30]  Yosef Grodzinsky,et al.  Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[31]  G. Waters,et al.  PET Studies of Syntactic Processing with Auditory Sentence Presentation , 1999, NeuroImage.

[32]  Holly P Branigan,et al.  Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during comprehension. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  M. Potter,et al.  Syntactic Priming in Immediate Recall of Sentences , 1998 .

[34]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Hierarchical Processing in Spoken Language Comprehension , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The priming method: imaging unconscious repetition priming reveals an abstract representation of number in the parietal lobes. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  Stephanie Kelter,et al.  Surface form and memory in question answering , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  Robert J. Zatorre,et al.  Bilingual brain organization: A functional magnetic resonance adaptation study , 2006, NeuroImage.