Texture Classification via Local Feature Representation of Multi-order Gradients

This paper presents a novel method to texture classification using local feature representation of multiple order gradients. Different from the state of the art approaches in literature that make use of the widely-used first order gradient based local descriptors, e.g. LBP, HOG, DAISY, SIFT, etc., we claim that the second order gradient based ones also provide critical contribution to classification performance, and thus propose to use Histogram of Second Order Gradients (HSOG) to describe micro-texton patterns. Both the similarity measurements of first and second order gradients computed by Bag-of-Feature modeling and SVM classifier are combined for decision making. Experimental results achieved on the Outex_TC dataset not only illustrate that the second order gradient based HSOG is effective to classify texture images, but also highlight that multiple order gradient based description by fusing complementary clues of the first and second order gradients is a promising solution to improve the accuracy in texture classification.

[1]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Face Recognition with Local Binary Patterns , 2004, ECCV.

[2]  Jiří Matas,et al.  Computer Vision - ECCV 2004 , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[3]  Yong Xu,et al.  Combining powerful local and global statistics for texture description , 2009, CVPR.

[4]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  A Performance Evaluation of Local Descriptors , 2005, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Andreas Zell,et al.  High resolution visual terrain classification for outdoor robots , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops).

[6]  Chao Zhu,et al.  Visual object recognition using DAISY descriptor , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[7]  Mario Fritz,et al.  On the Significance of Real-World Conditions for Material Classification , 2004, ECCV.

[8]  Bill Triggs,et al.  Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[9]  N E Scott-Samuel,et al.  First-order and second-order signals combine to improve perceptual accuracy. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  Liming Chen,et al.  HSOG: a novel local descriptor based on histograms of second order gradients for object categorization , 2013, ICMR '13.

[11]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  Gabriela Csurka,et al.  Visual categorization with bags of keypoints , 2002, eccv 2004.

[13]  Larry S. Davis,et al.  A novel feature descriptor based on the shearlet transform , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[14]  Vincent Lepetit,et al.  A fast local descriptor for dense matching , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[15]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  A sparse texture representation using local affine regions , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[16]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[17]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Local Features and Kernels for Classification of Texture and Object Categories: A Comprehensive Study , 2006, 2006 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPRW'06).

[18]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Outex - new framework for empirical evaluation of texture analysis algorithms , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.