Acquired hedonic and sensory characteristics of odours: Influence of sweet liker and propylthiouracil taster status

Repeated pairings of novel food-related odours with sweet tastes can result in enduring changes in sweetness of the odour alone, but have less consistent effects on odour liking. Variation in ability to taste propylthiouracil (PROP) might account for this, since PROP supertasters (ST) have been reported both to experience stronger sweetness intensity and to be more likely to dislike sweetness than do PROP nontasters (NT). Alternatively, individual differences in liking for sweetness may transfer to sweet-paired odours independently of PROP sensitivity. To explore this, evaluations of sucrose, saccharin, and PROP solutions were used to classify 92 volunteers as either sweet likers or dislikers and as PROP ST, NT, or medium tasters (MT). Changes in pleasantness of odours that had been paired with the taste of saccharin increased in sweet likers but decreased in dislikers. Odour sweetness increased regardless of PROP taster or sweet liker status. PROP ST rated saccharin as more bitter than did other taster groups and also showed greater increases in acquired bitterness of the saccharin-paired odour. Overall, these data suggest that individual differences in evaluation of saccharin reliably predict subsequent changes in evaluation of saccharin-paired odours, with hedonic changes corresponding with liking for sweet tastes and sensory changes reflecting differences in sensory quality between PROP taster groups.

[1]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  PTC taste blindness and the taste of caffeine , 1975, Nature.

[2]  D. G. Laing,et al.  A quantitative study of fungiform papillae and taste pore density in adults and children. , 2002, Brain research. Developmental brain research.

[3]  H. Weingarten,et al.  Facial expressions and genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil predict hedonic response to sweet , 1992, Physiology & Behavior.

[4]  R. Hancox,et al.  Psychosocial correlates of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) ratings in a birth cohort , 2007, Appetite.

[5]  Linda M. Bartoshuk,et al.  Sweetness of sucrose, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone, and saccharin is related to genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil , 1983 .

[6]  S. Mobini,et al.  Differential hedonic, sensory and behavioral changes associated with flavor–nutrient and flavor–flavor learning , 2008, Physiology & Behavior.

[7]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  Bitterness of KCl and benzoate: Related to genetic status for sensitivity to PTC/PROP. , 1988 .

[8]  Judith R Kidd,et al.  Supertasting and PROP bitterness depends on more than the TAS2R38 gene. , 2008, Chemical senses.

[9]  David J. Mela.  Bitter taste intensity: the effect of tastant and thiourea taster status , 1989 .

[10]  P. Lovibond,et al.  Flavor evaluative conditioning and contingency awareness , 2007, Learning & behavior.

[11]  Elizabeth Matisoo-Smith,et al.  Taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil predicts acceptance of bitter-tasting spinach in 3-6-y-old children. , 2002, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[12]  S. Mobini,et al.  Effects of hunger state on flavour pleasantness conditioning at home: Flavour–nutrient learning vs. flavour–flavour learning , 2007, Appetite.

[13]  R. Stevenson,et al.  Olfactory-induced synesthesias: a review and model. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  K. Fast.  Developing a scale to measure just about anything: comparisons across groups and individuals , 2004 .

[15]  B Cowart,et al.  Evaluating the 'Labeled Magnitude Scale' for measuring sensations of taste and smell. , 1996, Chemical senses.

[16]  P. Schultz,et al.  Three sweet receptor genes are clustered in human Chromosome 1 , 2003, Mammalian Genome.

[17]  Xiaodong Li,et al.  Human receptors for sweet and umami taste , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  S. Mobini,et al.  Hunger alters the expression of acquired hedonic but not sensory qualities of food-paired odors in humans. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[19]  J. Prescott,et al.  Responses of PROP taster groups to variations in sensory qualities within foods and beverages , 2004, Physiology & Behavior.

[20]  I. Wakeling,et al.  Binary taste mixture interactions in prop non-tasters, medium-tasters and super-tasters. , 2001, Chemical senses.

[21]  A. Blakeslee.  Genetics of Sensory Thresholds: Taste for Phenyl Thio Carbamide. , 1932, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  L. Bartoshuk,et al.  Bitter taste of saccharin related to the genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil. , 1979, Science.

[23]  J. Prescott.  Comparisons of taste perceptions and preferences of Japanese and Australian consumers: overview and implications for cross-cultural sensory research , 1998 .

[24]  V. Duffy,et al.  Food acceptance and genetic variation in taste. , 2000, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[25]  John Prescott,et al.  The acquisition of taste properties by odors , 1995 .

[26]  I. Martin,et al.  Evaluative Conditioning A Case for Hedonic Transfer , 1987 .

[27]  A. Blakeslee,et al.  Genetics of Sensory Thresholds: Individual Taste Reactions for Different Substances. , 1935, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  E. Leach,et al.  Comparison of bitterness of caffeine and quinine by a time – intensity procedure , 1986 .

[29]  P. Breslin,et al.  Genetics of Human Taste Perception on Behalf Of: International and American Associations for Dental Research , 2004 .

[30]  R. Boakes,et al.  Counter-conditioning Following Human Odor–Taste and Color–Taste Learning ☆ , 2000 .

[31]  R. Boakes,et al.  Changes in Odor Sweetness Resulting from Implicit Learning of a Simultaneous Odor-Sweetness Association: An Example of Learned Synesthesia ☆ ☆☆ , 1998 .

[32]  J. Brunstrom,et al.  Flavour–flavour learning occurs automatically and only in hungry participants , 2008, Physiology & Behavior.

[33]  Linda M. Bartoshuk,et al.  Labeled scales (e.g., category, Likert, VAS) and invalid across-group comparisons: what we have learned from genetic variation in taste , 2003 .

[34]  S. Mobini,et al.  Hedonic and sensory characteristics of odors conditioned by pairing with tastants in humans. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[35]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Taste and food preferences as predictors of dietary practices in young women , 1999, Public Health Nutrition.

[36]  L. H. Snyder.  INHERITED TASTE DEFICIENCY. , 1931, Science.

[37]  L. Bartoshuk,et al.  Children's food preferences and genetic sensitivity to the bitter taste of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP). , 1991, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[38]  S. Mobini,et al.  Additive effects of flavour–caffeine and flavour–flavour pairings on liking for the smell and flavour of a novel drink , 2007, Physiology & Behavior.

[39]  Frank Baeyens,et al.  Flavor-flavor and color-flavor conditioning in humans , 1990 .

[40]  Rose Marie Pangborn,et al.  Individual variation in affective responses to taste stimuli , 1970 .

[41]  V. Duffy,et al.  PROP (6‐n‐Propylthiouracil) Supertasters and the Saltiness of NaCl a , 1998, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[42]  R. Boakes,et al.  Resistance to extinction of conditioned odor perceptions: evaluative conditioning is not unique. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and hedonic responses to bitter and sweet tastes. , 1997, Chemical senses.

[44]  John Prescott,et al.  Human hedonic responses to sweetness: Role of taste genetics and anatomy , 2007, Physiology & Behavior.

[45]  Beverly J. Tepper,et al.  Development of brief methods to classify individuals by PROP taster status , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[46]  P. Rozin,et al.  Conditioned enhancement of human's liking for flavor by pairing with sweetness. , 1983 .

[47]  E. Glanville,et al.  Food Preference and Sensitivity of Taste for Bitter Compounds , 1965, Nature.

[48]  R. Boakes,et al.  Resistance to extinction of conditioned odor perceptions : evaluative conditioning is not unique , 2000 .

[49]  J. E. Steiner,et al.  Comparative expression of hedonic impact: affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primates , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[50]  Linda M. Bartoshuk,et al.  PTC/PROP tasting: Anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects , 1994, Physiology & Behavior.

[51]  V. Duffy,et al.  Propylthiouracil tasting: determination of underlying threshold distributions using maximum likelihood. , 1995, Chemical senses.

[52]  H. Lawless,et al.  Bitter taste of saccharin and acesulfame-K. , 2002, Chemical senses.

[53]  H. Weingarten,et al.  Effects of metabolic state on sweet taste reactivity in humans depend on underlying hedonic response profile , 1991 .

[54]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Flavor-evaluative conditioning is unaffected by contingency knowledge during training with color-flavor compounds , 2007, Learning & behavior.

[55]  P. Rozin,et al.  Human food selection: the interaction of biology, culture and individual experience. , 1982 .