The independent detection of motion energy and counterchange: Flexibility in motion detection

Motion perception is determined by changing patterns of neural activation initiated by spatiotemporal changes in stimulus features. Motion specified by 1st-order motion energy entails neural patterns that are initiated by spatiotemporal changes in luminance, whereas motion specified by counterchange entails oppositely signed changes in neural activation that can be initiated by spatiotemporal changes in any feature. A constraint in furthering this distinction is that motion energy and counterchange are co-specified by most visual stimuli. In the current study, counterchange was isolated for stimuli composed of translating subjective (Kanizsa) squares, surfaces created by the visual system. Motion energy was isolated for stimuli composed of sequences of luminance increments that spread across perceptually stationary, literal surfaces. Counterchange-specified motion was perceived over a wide range of frame durations, and preferentially for short motion paths. Motion specified by motion energy was diminished for relatively long frame durations, and was unaffected by the length of the motion path. Finally, it was found that blank inter-frame intervals can restore counterchange-specified motion perception for frame durations that are otherwise too brief for motion to be perceived. The results of these and earlier experiments suggest that 1st-order motion energy mechanisms, dedicated to the detection of changes in neural activation initiated by spatiotemporal changes in luminance, provide the basis for objectless motion perception (Wertheimer's phi motion). In contrast, counterchanging neural activation initiated by spatiotemporal changes in any feature, including features created by the visual system, provides a flexible basis for the perception of object motion (Wertheimer's beta motion).

[1]  O. Braddick A short-range process in apparent motion. , 1974, Vision research.

[2]  Lee A. Gilroy,et al.  A common mechanism for the perception of first-order and second-order apparent motion , 2005, Vision Research.

[3]  Robert W. Kentridge,et al.  Shape Processing Area LO and Illusory Contours , 2009, Perception.

[4]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. , 1985, Psychological review.

[5]  A taxonomy of directional motion judgement based on informational content: Evidence from a deficit following bilateral parietal brain damage , 2013 .

[6]  G. Sperling,et al.  The functional architecture of human visual motion perception , 1995, Vision Research.

[7]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses. , 1984, Science.

[8]  B. Julesz Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[9]  T. S. Lee,et al.  Dynamics of subjective contour formation in the early visual cortex. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  H. Barlow,et al.  The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit's retina. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Voluntary and Stimulus-Induced Attention Detected as Motion Sensation , 1993, Perception.

[12]  G Sperling,et al.  Measuring the amplification of attention. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Lee A. Gilroy,et al.  Counter-Changing Luminance: A Non-Fourier, Nonattentional Basis for the Perception of Single-Element Apparent Motion , 2002 .

[14]  R Shapley,et al.  Illusory contours activate specific regions in human visual cortex: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based motion perception. , 1992, Science.

[16]  H. Hock,et al.  Differential activation solution to the , 2001 .

[17]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  A counterchange mechanism for the perception of motion. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[18]  David F. Nichols,et al.  The line motion illusion: the detection of counterchanging edge and surface contrast. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[20]  O J Braddick,et al.  Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[21]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[22]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[23]  H. Hock,et al.  Multiplicative nonlinearity in the perception of apparent motion , 2004, Vision Research.

[24]  F. Sgrò BETA MOTION THRESHOLDS. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation , 1993, Vision Research.

[26]  P. A. Kolers THE ILLUSION OF MOVEMENT. , 1964, Scientific American.

[27]  Howard S Hock,et al.  The perception of object versus objectless motion , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[28]  H. Hock,et al.  Differential activation solution to the motion correspondence problem. , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  G. Sperling,et al.  Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[30]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[31]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT , 1998, Vision Research.

[32]  George Sperling,et al.  A Systems Analysis of Visual Motion Perception , 1999 .

[33]  G. Kanizsa,et al.  Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception , 1979 .

[34]  J. Hennig,et al.  The Processing of First- and Second-Order Motion in Human Visual Cortex Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Stroboscope motion: Effects of duration and interval1 , 1970 .

[36]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Motion: the long and short of it. , 1989, Spatial vision.