Speaking for listening

Speech production is constrained at all levels by the demands of speech perception. The speaker's primary aim is successful communication, and to this end semantic, syntactic and lexical choices are directed by the needs of the listener. Even at the articulatory level, some aspects of production appear to be perceptually constrained, for example the blocking of phonological distortions under certain conditions. An apparent exception to this pattern is word boundary information, which ought to be extremely useful to listeners, but which is not reliably coded in speech. It is argued that the solution to this apparent problem lies in rethinking the concept of the boundary of the lexical access unit. Speech rhythm provides clear information about the location of stressed syllables, and listeners do make use of this information. If stressed syllables can serve as the determinants of word lexical access codes, then once again speakers are providing precisely the necessary form of speech information to facilitate perception.

[1]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Prosodic marking in speech repair , 1983 .

[2]  Virginia Valian,et al.  What's what: talkers help listeners hear and understand by clarifying sentential relations , 1976, Cognition.

[3]  D. Norris,et al.  A language-specific comprehension strategy , 1983, Nature.

[4]  William E. Cooper,et al.  Syntax and Speech , 1980 .

[5]  S. Keele,et al.  Do perception and motor production share common timing mechanisms: a correctional analysis. , 1985, Acta psychologica.

[6]  D. Ladd.  The structure of intonational meaning , 1978 .

[7]  C. Darwin,et al.  On the Dynamic Use of Prosody in Speech Perception , 1975 .

[8]  J. G. Martin.  Rhythmic and segmental perception are not independent. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Syllable omission errors and isochrony , 1980 .

[10]  Donald G. MacKay,et al.  On the Retrieval and Lexical Structure of Verbs. , 1976 .

[11]  Anne Cutler.  Speakers' conceptions of the functions of prosody , 1983 .

[12]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words , 1975 .

[13]  W. Levelt,et al.  Monitoring and self-repair in speech , 1983, Cognition.

[14]  J. Klein,et al.  Syntactic structure and acoustic pattern in speech perception Arthur Wingfield , 1971 .

[15]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. , 1986 .

[16]  S. Isard,et al.  The production of prosody , 1980 .

[17]  A. Cutler.  Degrees of Transparency in Word Formation , 1981, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[18]  L. Shaffer.  Rhythm and timing in skill. , 1982, Psychological review.

[19]  W. Marslen-Wilson.  SPEECH UNDERSTANDING AS A PSYCHOLOGICAL PROCESS , 1980 .

[20]  Anne Cutler.  Productivity in word formation , 1980 .

[21]  D. L. Imhoff,et al.  Reaction time to temporally-displaced phoneme targets in continuous speech. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Lori Alice Taft,et al.  Prosodic constraints and lexical parsing strategies , 1985 .

[23]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  The Role of Syllables in Speech Processing: Infant and Adult Data [and Discussion] , 1981 .

[24]  A. Cutler.  Phoneme-monitoring reaction time as a function of preceding intonation contour , 1976 .

[25]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access , 1988 .