Autologous dermis graft at the time of evisceration or enucleation

Aim: To present a new technique using autologous dermis graft at the time of enucleation or evisceration to replace the ocular surface area lost when the corneal scleral button is excised. Methods: A retrospective, interventional, non-comparative case series of patients who had an autologous dermis graft placed to assist in closure of Tenon’s capsule and conjunctiva at the time of enucleation or evisceration. Medical records were reviewed and the following variables were recorded: age, sex, history of previous ocular surgery or radiation treatment, indication for surgery, type of surgery, laterality, type of orbital implant, size of implant, length of follow up, and complications. Results: Nine patients were identified (three male, six female) Five had enucleation with implant placement and four had evisceration with implant placement. Four individuals received unwrapped porous polyethylene spherical implants, three received silicone implants, and two received hydroxylapatite implants. Follow up ranged from 30 to 112 weeks (mean (SD), 61 (28) weeks). No operative or early complications were observed. One patient who had enucleation after two rounds of brachytherapy for uveal melanoma developed subsequent late exposure of the implant. There were no complications involving the graft donor site. Conclusions: This small series shows that the use of a dermis graft is a safe and effective new technique to facilitate orbital rehabilitation. It is hypothesised that the extra surface area produced with a dermis graft preserves the fornices and allows a larger implant. It may also allow the implant to be placed more anteriorly which assists with both implant and prosthesis motility.

[1]  Joseph L Demer,et al.  Current concepts of mechanical and neural factors in ocular motility , 2006, Current opinion in neurology.

[2]  S. R. Klapper,et al.  Surgical Techniques in Enucleation: The Role of Various Types of Implants and the Efficacy of Pegged and Nonpegged Approaches , 2006, International ophthalmology clinics.

[3]  J. Augsburger,et al.  Enucleation With Unwrapped Porous and Nonporous Orbital Implants: A 15-Year Experience , 2004, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  D. R. Jordan,et al.  Problems After Evisceration Surgery With Porous Orbital Implants: Experience With 86 Patients , 2004, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  Grant W Su,et al.  Current Trends in Managing the Anophthalmic Socket After Primary Enucleation and Evisceration , 2004, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  W. White,et al.  The porous polyethylene (Medpor) spherical orbital implant: a retrospective study of 136 cases. , 2004, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  S. Kaltreider,et al.  Orbital implants in enucleation surgery: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[8]  Bradley R Straatsma,et al.  Functional anatomy of the anophthalmic socket: insights from magnetic resonance imaging. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  J. Dutton,et al.  A Comparison of Rates of Fibrovascular Ingrowth in Wrapped Versus Unwrapped Hydroxyapatite Spheres in a Rabbit Model , 2002, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  M. Duffy,et al.  Exposure Rates of Wrapped and Unwrapped Orbital Implants Following Enucleation , 2001, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  J. Patrinely,et al.  Porous Polyethylene Implant Fibrovascularization Rate Is Affected by Tissue Wrapping, Agarose Coating, and Insertion Site , 2000, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  B. Biesman,et al.  Current Techniques of Enucleation: A Survey of 5,439 Intraorbital Implants and a Review of the Literature , 1995, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[13]  K. V. Jahrling,et al.  Complications of porous spherical orbital implants. , 1995, Ophthalmology.

[14]  Y. D. Kim,et al.  Management of exposed hydroxyapatite orbital implants. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[15]  P. Rubin,et al.  Enucleation, evisceration, and exenteration. , 1993, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[16]  L. Kwok,et al.  Calculation and application of the anterior surface area of a model human cornea. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  R. Lisman,et al.  An autogenous kinetic dermis-fat orbital implant: an updated technique. , 1982, Ophthalmology.

[18]  B. Smith,et al.  Dermis-fat graft as a movable implant within the muscle cone. , 1978, American journal of ophthalmology.