Global Assessment of the SMAP Level-4 Surface and Root-Zone Soil Moisture Product Using Assimilation Diagnostics.

The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission Level-4 Soil Moisture (L4_SM) product provides 3-hourly, 9-km resolution, global estimates of surface (0-5 cm) and root-zone (0-100 cm) soil moisture and related land surface variables from 31 March 2015 to present with ~2.5day latency. The ensemble-based L4_SM algorithm assimilates SMAP brightness temperature (Tb) observations into the Catchment land surface model. This study describes the spatially distributed L4_SM analysis and assesses the observation-minus-forecast (O-F) Tb residuals and the soil moisture and temperature analysis increments. Owing to the climatological rescaling of the Tb observations prior to assimilation, the analysis is essentially unbiased, with global mean values of ~0.37 K for the O-F Tb residuals and practically zero for the soil moisture and temperature increments. There are, however, modest regional (absolute) biases in the O-F residuals (under ~3 K), the soil moisture increments (under ~0.01 m3 m-3), and the surface soil temperature increments (under ~1 K). Typical instantaneous values are ~6 K for O-F residuals, ~0.01 (~0.003) m3 m-3 for surface (root-zone) soil moisture increments, and ~0.6 K for surface soil temperature increments. The O-F diagnostics indicate that the actual errors in the system are overestimated in deserts and densely vegetated regions and underestimated in agricultural regions and transition zones between dry and wet climates. The O-F auto-correlations suggest that the SMAP observations are used efficiently in western North America, the Sahel, and Australia, but not in many forested regions and the high northern latitudes. A case study in Australia demonstrates that assimilating SMAP observations successfully corrects short-term errors in the L4_SM rainfall forcing.

[1]  E. Natasha Stavros,et al.  Soil Moisture Active Passive Mission L4_C Data Product Assessment (Version 2 Validated Release) , 2016 .

[2]  S. Cohn,et al.  Ooce Note Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation Construction of Correlation Functions in Two and Three Dimensions and Convolution Covariance Functions , 2022 .

[3]  Jessica Blunden,et al.  STATE OF THE CLIMATE IN 2015 , 2019 .

[4]  Christopher Ruf,et al.  Radio-Frequency Interference Mitigation for the Soil Moisture Active Passive Microwave Radiometer , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Bruce H. Raup,et al.  EASE-Grid 2.0: Incremental but Significant Improvements for Earth-Gridded Data Sets , 2012, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[6]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Assimilating remotely sensed snow observations into a macroscale hydrology model , 2006 .

[7]  D. G. Watts,et al.  Spectral analysis and its applications , 1968 .

[8]  William A. Lahoz,et al.  Closing the Gaps in Our Knowledge of the Hydrological Cycle over Land: Conceptual Problems , 2014, Surveys in Geophysics.

[9]  Gabrielle De Lannoy,et al.  Assimilation of SMOS brightness temperatures or soil moisture retrievals into a land surface model , 2016 .

[10]  A.H. Haddad,et al.  Applied optimal estimation , 1976, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  G. Evensen,et al.  Analysis Scheme in the Ensemble Kalman Filter , 1998 .

[12]  Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen,et al.  TerrSysMP–PDAF (version 1.0): a modular high-performance data assimilation framework for an integrated land surface–subsurface model , 2015 .

[13]  M. Durand,et al.  Effects of uncertainty magnitude and accuracy on assimilation of multiscale measurements for snowpack characterization , 2008 .

[14]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  A land surface data assimilation framework using the land information system : Description and applications , 2008 .

[15]  Geir Evensen,et al.  The Ensemble Kalman Filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation , 2003 .

[16]  G. Lannoy,et al.  A Dynamic Approach to Addressing Observation-Minus-Forecast Mean Differences in a Land Surface Skin Temperature Data Assimilation System , 2015 .

[17]  R. Daley.  The Lagged Innovation Covariance: A Performance Diagnostic for Atmospheric Data Assimilation , 1992 .

[18]  R. Koster,et al.  Land Surface Precipitation in MERRA-2 , 2017 .

[19]  T. Schmugge,et al.  Vegetation effects on the microwave emission of soils , 1991 .

[20]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  An adaptive ensemble Kalman filter for soil moisture data assimilation , 2007 .

[21]  Jasper A. Vrugt,et al.  Uncertainty quantification of GEOS-5 L-band radiative transfer model parameters using Bayesian inference and SMOS observations , 2014 .

[22]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  An improved approach for estimating observation and model error parameters in soil moisture data assimilation , 2010 .

[23]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  Assessment of MERRA-2 Land Surface Hydrology Estimates , 2017 .

[24]  Paul Poli,et al.  Diagnosis of observation, background and analysis‐error statistics in observation space , 2005 .

[25]  Jeffrey P. Walker,et al.  Extended versus Ensemble Kalman Filtering for Land Data Assimilation , 2002 .

[26]  Assessing the Performance of the Ensemble Kalman Filter for Soil Moisture Profile Retrieval , 2010 .

[27]  Venkat Lakshmi,et al.  Advances in downscaling soil moisture for use in drought and flood assessments: Implications for data from the Soil Moisture Active and Passive (SMAP) Mission , 2015 .

[28]  Marco L. Carrera,et al.  The Canadian Land Data Assimilation System (CaLDAS): Description and Synthetic Evaluation Study , 2015 .

[29]  Klaus Scipal,et al.  Towards a Kalman Filter based soil moisture analysis system for the operational ECMWF Integrated Forecast System , 2009 .

[30]  R. Koster,et al.  A catchment-based approach to modeling land surface processes in a general circulation model , 2000 .

[31]  Rolf H. Reichle,et al.  Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Mission Level 4 Surface and Root Zone Soil Moisture (L4_SM) Product Specification Document , 2015 .

[32]  Ricardo Todling,et al.  Comparing Two Approaches for Assessing Observation Impact , 2013 .

[33]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  Assessment of the SMAP Level-4 surface and root-zone soil moisture product using in situ measurements , 2017 .

[34]  L. Isaksen,et al.  A simplified Extended Kalman Filter for the global operational soil moisture analysis at ECMWF , 2013 .

[35]  R. Koster,et al.  First Results from the SMAP Level 4 Surface and Root Zone Soil Moisture (L4_SM) Data Product , 2016 .

[36]  Richard H. Grumm,et al.  Assessing the Ensemble Predictability of Precipitation Forecasts for the January 2015 and 2016 East Coast Winter Storms , 2017 .

[37]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  Assessment of the impact of spatial heterogeneity on microwave satellite soil moisture periodic error. , 2018, Remote sensing of environment.

[38]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  Comparison of adaptive filtering techniques for land surface data assimilation , 2008 .

[39]  Philippe Richaume,et al.  SMOS Radio Frequency Interference Scenario: Status and Actions Taken to Improve the RFI Environment in the 1400–1427-MHz Passive Band , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[40]  Rolf H. Reichle,et al.  Connecting Satellite Observations with Water Cycle Variables Through Land Data Assimilation: Examples Using the NASA GEOS-5 LDAS , 2013, Surveys in Geophysics.

[41]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  A catchment‐based approach to modeling land surface processes in a general circulation model: 1. Model structure , 2000 .

[42]  A. Hollingsworth,et al.  The verification of objective analyses: Diagnostics of analysis system performance , 1989 .

[43]  Max J. Suarez,et al.  The Impact of Detailed Snow Physics on the Simulation of Snow Cover and Subsurface Thermodynamics at Continental Scales , 2001 .

[44]  W. Crow,et al.  L band microwave remote sensing and land data assimilation improve the representation of prestorm soil moisture conditions for hydrologic forecasting , 2017, Geophysical research letters.

[45]  W. Kinzelbach,et al.  Real‐time groundwater flow modeling with the Ensemble Kalman Filter: Joint estimation of states and parameters and the filter inbreeding problem , 2008 .

[46]  E. C. Stewart-Seed.  The dynamic approach. , 1979, The International journal of oral myology.

[47]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  De‐noising of passive and active microwave satellite soil moisture time series , 2013 .

[48]  E. Wood,et al.  Data Assimilation for Estimating the Terrestrial Water Budget Using a Constrained Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2006 .

[49]  Rolf H. Reichle,et al.  Observation-Corrected Precipitation Estimates in GEOS-5 , 2014 .

[50]  Gabrielle De Lannoy,et al.  Global Assimilation of Multiangle and Multipolarization SMOS Brightness Temperature Observations into the GEOS-5 Catchment Land Surface Model for Soil Moisture Estimation , 2016 .

[51]  Michael W. Spencer,et al.  SMAP L-Band Microwave Radiometer: Instrument Design and First Year on Orbit , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[52]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Investigating soil moisture-climate interactions in a changing climate: A review , 2010 .

[53]  G. Lannoy,et al.  Global Calibration of the GEOS-5 L-Band Microwave Radiative Transfer Model over Nonfrozen Land Using SMOS Observations , 2013 .

[54]  D. McLaughlin,et al.  Hydrologic Data Assimilation with the Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2002 .

[55]  D. McLaughlin,et al.  Assessing the Performance of the Ensemble Kalman Filter for Land Surface Data Assimilation , 2006 .

[56]  Benjamin Scarino,et al.  A Dynamic Approach to Addressing Observation-Minus-Forecast Bias in a Land Surface Skin Temperature Data Assimilation System , 2015 .

[57]  Jiancheng Shi,et al.  The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Mission , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.