Compensation for Blur Requires Increase in Field of View and Viewing Time

Spatial resolution is an important factor for human pattern recognition. In particular, low resolution (blur) is a defining characteristic of low vision. Here, we examined spatial (field of view) and temporal (stimulus duration) requirements for blurry object recognition. The spatial resolution of an image such as letter or face, was manipulated with a low-pass filter. In experiment 1, studying spatial requirement, observers viewed a fixed-size object through a window of varying sizes, which was repositioned until object identification (moving window paradigm). Field of view requirement, quantified as the number of “views” (window repositions) for correct recognition, was obtained for three blur levels, including no blur. In experiment 2, studying temporal requirement, we determined threshold viewing time, the stimulus duration yielding criterion recognition accuracy, at six blur levels, including no blur. For letter and face recognition, we found blur significantly increased the number of views, suggesting a larger field of view is required to recognize blurry objects. We also found blur significantly increased threshold viewing time, suggesting longer temporal integration is necessary to recognize blurry objects. The temporal integration reflects the tradeoff between stimulus intensity and time. While humans excel at recognizing blurry objects, our findings suggest compensating for blur requires increased field of view and viewing time. The need for larger spatial and longer temporal integration for recognizing blurry objects may further challenge object recognition in low vision. Thus, interactions between blur and field of view should be considered for developing low vision rehabilitation or assistive aids.

[1]  Katsumi Aoki,et al.  Recent development of flow visualization , 2004, J. Vis..

[2]  C. Mangione,et al.  Influence of age-related maculopathy on visual functioning and health-related quality of life. , 1999, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  Serge O. Dumoulin,et al.  Decreased Fixation Stability of the Preferred Retinal Location in Juvenile Macular Degeneration , 2014, PloS one.

[4]  A. Nowicka,et al.  Visual-spatial-frequency model of cerebral asymmetry: a critical survey of behavioral and electrophysiological studies. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Does print size matter for reading? A review of findings from vision science and typography. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[6]  Lee A. Baugh,et al.  A new window into the interactions between perception and action , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Spatial-frequency cutoff requirements for pattern recognition in central and peripheral vision , 2011, Vision Research.

[8]  Jens Schwarzbach,et al.  Adaptive strategies for reading with a forced retinal location. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[9]  Anthony Randal McIntosh,et al.  Early Face Processing Specificity: It's in the Eyes! , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  I. Craw,et al.  Spatial Content and Spatial Quantisation Effects in Face Recognition , 1994, Perception.

[11]  B. P. Klein,et al.  Macular degeneration affects eye movement behavior during visual search , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[12]  Ipek Oruc,et al.  Looking at a blurry old family photo? Zoom out! , 2013, Perception.

[13]  Aude Oliva,et al.  Recognition of facial emotion in low vision: A flexible usage of facial features , 2008, Visual Neuroscience.

[14]  E. Poulton,et al.  Peripheral vision, refractoriness and eye movements in fast oral reading. , 1962, British journal of psychology.

[15]  Developmental changes in the visual span for reading , 2007, Vision Research.

[16]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[17]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[18]  L F Dell'Osso,et al.  Eyes as the Center of Focus in the Visual Examination of Human Faces , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[19]  A. Oliva,et al.  Flexible, Diagnosticity-Driven, Rather Than Fixed, Perceptually Determined Scale Selection in Scene and Face Recognition , 1997, Perception.

[20]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Visual Recognition As Soon as You Know It Is There, You Know What It Is , 2022 .

[21]  P. Artes,et al.  Face recognition in age related macular degeneration: perceived disability, measured disability, and performance with a bioptic device , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[22]  M. Fabre-Thorpe Visual categorization: accessing abstraction in non-human primates. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[23]  J. Sergent An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[24]  Nicholas Costen,et al.  One extreme or the other or perhaps the golden mean? Issues of spatial resolution in face processing , 1999 .

[25]  S J Leat,et al.  What is low vision? A re-evaluation of definitions. , 1999, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[26]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of face recognition in a flash: it's in the eyes , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  P. Schyns,et al.  Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects, and scenes , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  Stephen A. Engel,et al.  Linearity across spatial frequency in object recognition , 1998, Vision Research.

[29]  J. Duysens,et al.  Temporal integration in cat visual cortex: A test of bloch's law , 1991, Vision Research.

[30]  Bruno A Olshausen,et al.  Timecourse of neural signatures of object recognition. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[31]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[32]  Tracey D. Berger,et al.  Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[33]  K. Fujii,et al.  Visualization for the analysis of fluid motion , 2005, J. Vis..

[34]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[35]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Diagnostic use of scale information for componential and holistic recognition. , 2003 .

[36]  G. Legge,et al.  Developmental changes in the visual span for reading , 2005, Vision Research.

[37]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The visual filter mediating letter identification , 1994, Nature.

[38]  Michael H. Herzog,et al.  Bloch’s law and the dynamics of feature fusion , 2007, Vision Research.

[39]  L O Harvey,et al.  Identification confusions among letters of the alphabet. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  D H Kelly,et al.  Nonlinear visual responses to flickering sinusoidal gratings. , 1981, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[41]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification in central and peripheral vision , 2002, Vision Research.

[42]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Spatial-frequency requirements for reading revisited , 2011, Vision Research.

[43]  Roxane J. Itier,et al.  Neural bases of eye and gaze processing: The core of social cognition , 2009, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[44]  J Sergent Influence of task and input factors on hemispheric involvement in face processing. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition , 2003, Nature.

[46]  R. Klein,et al.  Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[47]  Cynthia Owsley,et al.  Characteristics of low-vision rehabilitation services in the United States. , 2009, Archives of ophthalmology.

[48]  I L Bailey,et al.  Face recognition in age-related maculopathy. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[49]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  The Role of High Spatial Frequencies in Face Perception , 2013, Perception.

[50]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[51]  D. H. Kelly,et al.  Retinal inhomogeneity. I. Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[52]  F. S. Beltran,et al.  The Relative Salience of Facial Features When Differentiating Faces Based on an Interference Paradigm , 2012 .

[53]  L. D. Harmon The recognition of faces. , 1973, Scientific American.

[54]  Q. Vuong,et al.  The Respective Role of Low and High Spatial Frequencies in Supporting Configural and Featural Processing of Faces , 2005, Perception.

[55]  D. Pelli,et al.  The uncrowded window of object recognition , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[56]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[57]  G. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—I. Normal vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[58]  G. Sperling,et al.  Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies, noise, and the efficiency of letter discrimination , 1991, Vision Research.

[59]  J. Hegdé Time course of visual perception: Coarse-to-fine processing and beyond , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.

[60]  R. Reynolds,et al.  Perception of an Illusory Contour as a Function of Processing Time , 1981, Perception.

[61]  T. Inui,et al.  The Effect of Changes in Visible Area on Facial Recognition , 1984, Perception.

[62]  D. Kahneman,et al.  THE TIME-INTENSITY RELATION IN VISUAL PERCEPTION AS A FUNCTION OF OBSERVER'S TASK. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[63]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[64]  Kim Marriott,et al.  A tool for tracking visual attention: The Restricted Focus Viewer , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[65]  J M Loomis,et al.  A model of character recognition and legibility. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[66]  Pawan Sinha,et al.  Recognizing complex patterns , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[67]  R. Näsänen Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images , 1999, Vision Research.

[68]  D. Pelli,et al.  The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification , 2002, Vision Research.

[69]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Low-Vision Reading Speed: Influences of Linguistic Inference and Aging , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[70]  Pádraig J. Mulholland,et al.  Estimating the critical duration for temporal summation of standard achromatic perimetric stimuli. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[71]  Ipek Oruç,et al.  Critical frequencies in the perception of letters, faces, and novel shapes: evidence for limited scale invariance for faces. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[72]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Higher-contrast requirements for recognizing low-pass-filtered letters. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[73]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[74]  Nikolaus F Troje,et al.  Face recognition is affected by similarity in spatial frequency range to a greater degree than within-category object recognition. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[75]  D. Crabb,et al.  Using Eye Tracking to Assess Reading Performance in Patients with Glaucoma: A Within-Person Study , 2014, Journal of ophthalmology.

[76]  A. Oliva,et al.  Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: when categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations , 1999, Cognition.

[77]  Michael S Landy,et al.  Scale dependence and channel switching in letter identification. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[78]  J. Movshon,et al.  Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of striate cortical neurones , 1975, Nature.

[79]  B Julesz,et al.  Masking in Visual Recognition: Effects of Two-Dimensional Filtered Noise , 1973, Science.

[80]  Lester C. Loschky,et al.  Investigating spatial vision and dynamic attentional selection using a gaze-contingent multiresolutional display. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[81]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Revisiting the role of spatial frequencies in the holistic processing of faces. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[82]  Francesc S. Beltran,et al.  Face perception: An integrative review of the role of spatial frequencies , 2006, Psychological research.

[83]  P. Schyns,et al.  Receptive Fields for Flexible Face Categorizations , 2004, Psychological science.

[84]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision , 1997, Vision Research.

[85]  Ethirajan Rathakrishnan,et al.  Visualization of axis-switching of elliptical slot jets , 2006, J. Vis..

[86]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—II. Low vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[87]  Ipek Oruc,et al.  Looking at a Blurry Old Family Photo? Zoom Out! , 2013, Perception.