Multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol

Introduction Dozens of multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (AFACS) have been published, but none have been incorporated into regular clinical practice. One of the reasons for this lack of adoption is poor model performance due to methodological weaknesses in model development. In addition, there has been little external validation of these existing models to evaluate their reproducibility and transportability. The aim of this systematic review is to critically appraise the methodology and risk of bias of papers presenting the development and/or validation of models for AFACS. Methods We will identify studies that present the development and/or validation of a multivariable prediction model for AFACS through searches of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science from inception to 31 December 2021. Pairs of reviewers will independently extract model performance measures, assess methodological quality and assess risk of bias of included studies using extraction forms adapted from a combination of the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies checklist and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Extracted information will be reported by narrative synthesis and descriptive statistics. Ethics and dissemination This systemic review will only include published aggregate data, so no protected health information will be used. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conference presentations. Further, this review will identify weaknesses in past AFACS prediction model development and validation methodology so that subsequent studies can improve upon prior practices and produce a clinically useful risk estimation tool. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019127329.

[1]  T. Hanke,et al.  The Strengths and Weaknesses of Left Atrial Appendage Ligation or Exclusion (LARIAT, AtriaClip, Surgical Suture). , 2022, Interventional cardiology clinics.

[2]  F. Crea,et al.  Posterior left pericardiotomy for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: an adaptive, single-centre, single-blind, randomised, controlled trial , 2021, The Lancet.

[3]  R. Bellomo,et al.  Predicting atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a scoping review of associated factors and systematic review of existing prediction models , 2021, Perfusion.

[4]  E. Mayo-Wilson,et al.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews , 2021, BMJ.

[5]  G. Collins,et al.  UMBRELLA protocol: systematic reviews of multivariable biomarker prognostic models developed to predict clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure , 2020, Diagnostic and Prognostic Research.

[6]  P. McCarthy,et al.  Concomitant atrial fibrillation ablation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass and cardiac valve surgery , 2020, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[7]  Paul A. Harris,et al.  The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners , 2019, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[8]  J. Piccini,et al.  Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists/European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists Practice Advisory for the Management of Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery. , 2019, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[9]  G. Collins,et al.  PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies , 2019, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  J. Piccini,et al.  Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists/European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists Practice Advisory for the Management of Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery , 2019, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[11]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[12]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[13]  T. Wagner,et al.  Postoperative atrial fibrillation impacts on costs and one-year clinical outcomes: the Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass Trial. , 2015, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  G. Collins,et al.  Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist , 2014, PLoS medicine.

[15]  R. Damiano,et al.  The persistent problem of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation: a single-institution experience over two decades. , 2011, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[16]  P. Harris,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[17]  Julian P. T. Higgins,et al.  Selecting Studies and Collecting Data , 2008 .

[18]  D. Wyse,et al.  Prophylactic Oral Amiodarone for the Prevention of Arrhythmias that Begin Early After Revascularization, Valve Replacement, or Repair: PAPABEAR: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, JAMA.

[19]  Thomas E. Moritz,et al.  Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a major morbid event? , 1997, Annals of surgery.

[20]  T O Cheng,et al.  Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery. , 1997, Circulation.