Toward National Estimates of Alcohol Use Disorders among Drivers: Results from the National Roadside Survey Pilot Program

Objective: To determine whether drivers contacted at the roadside can be screened for alcohol use disorders (AUDs). Secondarily, to produce preliminary estimates of AUDs among drivers and estimate the relationship between AUD status and BAC measured at the roadside. Methods: A two-phase survey program was undertaken. In phase 1, 206 motorists were interviewed at the roadside using a 15-item AUD Survey derived from a condensed version of the AUDADIS and the AUDIT-C. One hundred sixty-seven of these motorists were invited, for a $25 incentive, to call the research team within 48 h of the roadside assessment to repeat the questionnaire and complete a more detailed AUD assessment. Phase 2 involved a 6-state pilot test of the AUD Survey as an add-on to the 2005 National Roadside Survey Pilot Program. The setting for both phases of the survey program was US roadways on weekends between 10 p.m. and 3 a.m. Results: Ninety-seven percent of all eligible drivers completed the AUD questionnaire. The correlation between roadside and telephone interview results was 0.3 for alcohol abuse, 0.6 for alcohol dependence and heavy drinking, and 0.7 for binge drinking. Alcohol abuse and dependence diagnoses had 0.6 and 0.7 correlations with diagnoses derived from the full AUDADIS and the AUDIT-C had a 0.8 correlation with the full AUDIT. There was also a statistically significant and positive relationship between having a positive BAC at the roadside and meeting criteria for heavy drinking. Conclusions: AUD status can be effectively measured at the roadside. The poor reliability for alcohol abuse is related to underreporting of drinking and driving during roadside assessments, compared to telephone follow-up. Other measures of hazardous alcohol use should be used in the roadside context to measure alcohol abuse.

[1]  B. Grant,et al.  Concordance between ICD-10 alcohol and drug use disorder criteria and diagnoses as measured by the AUDADIS-ADR, CIDI and SCAN: results of a cross-national study. , 1997, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[2]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[3]  John H. Lacey,et al.  STATE OF KNOWLEDGE OF ALCOHOL-IMPAIRED DRIVING: RESEARCH ON REPEAT DWI OFFENDERS , 2000 .

[4]  S. Daniel,et al.  National Highway Traffic Safety Administration , 2020, Federal Regulatory Guide.

[5]  B. Grant,et al.  Comorbidity between DSM-IV alcohol use disorders and major depression: results of a national survey. , 1995, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[6]  W R Williford,et al.  Drunk-driving recidivism: predicting factors from arrest context and case disposition. , 1995, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[7]  B. Grant,et al.  Reliability of the alcohol and drug modules of the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule--Alcohol/Drug-Revised (AUDADIS-ADR): an international comparison. , 1997, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[8]  James L. Nichols,et al.  THE SPECIFIC DETERRENT EFFECT OF ASAP EDUCATION AND REHABILITATION PROGRAMS , 1978 .

[9]  N Sartorius,et al.  WHO Study on the reliability and validity of the alcohol and drug use disorder instruments: overview of methods and results. , 1997, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[10]  B. Grant.  Prevalence and correlates of alcohol use and DSM-IV alcohol dependence in the United States: results of the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey. , 1997, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[11]  Robert B. Voas,et al.  Sampling Procedures and Survey Methodologies for the 1996 Survey with Comparisons to Earlier National Roadside Surveys , 1999, Evaluation review.

[12]  J. Associates.  Surgeon General's Workshop on Drunk Driving: Background Papers , 1989 .

[13]  Maristela Monteiro,et al.  AUDIT - The alcohol use disorders identification test: guidelines for use in primary care. , 2001 .

[14]  T. Nochajski,et al.  The limited utility of BAC for identifying alcohol-related problems among DWI offenders. , 1992, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[15]  M. O’Connor,et al.  Health care provider advice and risk factors associated with alcohol consumption following pregnancy recognition. , 2006, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[16]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[17]  J H Lacey,et al.  Alcohol highway safety : problem update , 1998 .

[18]  W. Grove.  Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .

[19]  T B Conley,et al.  Construct validity of the MAST and AUDIT with multiple offender drunk drivers. , 2001, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[20]  E. Walker,et al.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[21]  Nancy P Barnett,et al.  Alcohol use disorders identification test: factor structure in an adolescent emergency department sample. , 2002, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[22]  M. Kushner,et al.  Pathological Gambling and Alcohol Use Disorder , 2002, Alcohol Research & Health.

[23]  R C Peck,et al.  Estimating the exposure and fatal crash rates of suspended/revoked and unlicensed drivers in California. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  A Scott Tippetts,et al.  Drinking status and fatal crashes: which drinkers contribute most to the problem? , 2006, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[25]  Tara Kelley-Baker,et al.  Pilot Test of New Roadside Survey Methodology for Impaired Driving , 2007 .

[26]  B. Grant,et al.  Concordance of DSM-IV alcohol and drug use disorder criteria and diagnoses as measured by AUDADIS-ADR, CIDI and SCAN. , 1997, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[27]  G. Canino,et al.  The Spanish Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule (AUDADIS): reliability and concordance with clinical diagnoses in a Hispanic population. , 1999, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[28]  B. Grant,et al.  Reliability of the Romanian Version of the Alcohol Module of the WHO Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities: Interview Schedule – Alcohol/Drug-Revised , 1998, European Addiction Research.

[29]  B. Grant,et al.  Nosological comparisons of alcohol and drug diagnoses: a multisite, multi-instrument international study. , 1997, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[30]  S. Cantor,et al.  The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as a screen for at-risk drinking in primary care patients of different racial/ethnic backgrounds. , 1997, Addiction.