Mean Winds Through an Inhomogeneous Urban Canopy

The mean flow within inhomogeneous urban areas is investigated using an urban canopy model. The urban canopy model provides a conceptual and computational tool for representing urban areas in a way suitable for parameterisation within numerical weather prediction and urban air quality models. Average aerodynamic properties of groups of buildings on a neighbourhood scale can be obtained in terms of the geometry and layout of the buildings. These canopy parameters then determine the spatially averaged mean wind speeds within the canopy as a whole. Using morphological data for real cities, computations are performed for representative sections of cities. Simulations are performed to study transitions between different urban neighbourhoods, such as residential areas and city centres. Such transitions are accompanied by changes in mean building density and building height. These are considered first in isolation, then in combination, and the generic effects of each type of change are identified. The simulation of winds through a selection of downtown Los Angeles is considered as an example. An increase in canopy density is usually associated with a decrease in the mean wind speed. The largest difference between mean winds in canopies of different densities occurs near ground level. Winds generally decrease upon encountering a taller canopy of the same density, but this effect may be reversed very near the ground, with possible speed-ups if the canopy is especially tall. In the vicinity of a transition there is an overshoot in the mean wind speed in the bottom part of the canopy. Mechanisms for these effects are discussed.

[1]  Rex Britter,et al.  Velocity measurements and order of magnitude estimates of the flow between two buildings in a simulated atmospheric boundary layer , 1979 .

[2]  Timothy R. Oke,et al.  Aerodynamic Properties of Urban Areas Derived from Analysis of Surface Form , 1999 .

[3]  Marcel Bottema Towards rules of thumb for wind comfort and air quality , 1999 .

[4]  J. Finnigan Turbulence in plant canopies , 2000 .

[5]  Mathias W. Rotach,et al.  On the influence of the urban roughness sublayer on turbulence and dispersion , 1999 .

[6]  R. A. Antonia,et al.  Rough-Wall Turbulent Boundary Layers , 1991 .

[7]  R. Bornstein,et al.  Urban-rural wind velocity differences , 1977 .

[8]  S. Belcher,et al.  Adjustment of a turbulent boundary layer to a canopy of roughness elements , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  A. Clappier,et al.  An Urban Surface Exchange Parameterisation for Mesoscale Models , 2002 .

[10]  H. Cheng,et al.  Near-Wall Flow Development After A Step Change In Surface Roughness , 2002 .

[11]  Ronald M. Cionco,et al.  A Mathematical Model for Air Flow in a Vegetative Canopy , 1965 .

[12]  Stephen E. Belcher,et al.  A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas , 2004 .

[13]  R. Griffiths,et al.  An improved method for the estimation of surface roughness of obstacle arrays , 1998 .

[14]  R. Britter,et al.  FLOW AND DISPERSION IN URBAN AREAS , 2003 .

[15]  M. Raupach,et al.  Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies , 1982 .

[16]  R. Macdonald,et al.  Modelling The Mean Velocity Profile In The Urban Canopy Layer , 2000 .

[17]  Ian P. Castro,et al.  Near Wall Flow over Urban-like Roughness , 2002 .

[18]  J. A. Leene Building wake effects in complex situations , 1992 .

[19]  M. Rotach Profiles of turbulence statistics in and above an urban street canyon , 1995 .

[20]  J. Finnigan,et al.  Turbulent Transport in Flexible Plant Canopies , 1985 .

[21]  J. Finnigan,et al.  Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: The mixing-layer analogy , 1996 .